Hey G35Mass...
#31
My apologies, I was confused. It isn't just Massachusetts, but all of the US.
Increased surveillance of citizenry, Reduced judiciary and executive treatment of suspects, etc. These are set in motion by higher authorities and implemented by law enforcement divisions. It is a job they must do.
Increased surveillance of citizenry, Reduced judiciary and executive treatment of suspects, etc. These are set in motion by higher authorities and implemented by law enforcement divisions. It is a job they must do.
#32
Originally Posted by khundkar
Reduced judiciary and executive treatment of suspects, etc.
Here's a lame caselaw from last week.
Stop a car, detect the odor of burnt marijuana. Because it's BURNT, it's gone, so you don't have PC to search the trunk. It's BURNT, so there's no PC that any more exists in the car.
Only in Massachusetts
#33
Marijuana should be decriminalized anyway.
Or, if we really wanted to reduce our country's debt, the government could legalize it and then tax the sale. We'd also save money other ways...
Or, if we really wanted to reduce our country's debt, the government could legalize it and then tax the sale. We'd also save money other ways...
From the government's (and taxpayer's) point of view, the real fiscal benefit from abandoning the war on marijuana would come from no longer arresting, prosecuting, and jailing pot smokers, sellers, and growers. Drug law enforcement costs something like $40 billion a year, and marijuana accounted for 43 percent of drug arrests in 2005. That doesn't mean legalizing marijuana would save two-fifths of the money spent on the drug war, since marijuana offenders are much less likely to be imprisoned than other kinds of drug offenders. But the savings certainly would be substantial. And that's not counting all the indirect costs, such as marijuana offenders' legal expenses, loss of freedom, forgone income, and so on.
#35
Originally Posted by G35 Mass
Can you provide a factual example?
Here's a lame caselaw from last week.
Stop a car, detect the odor of burnt marijuana. Because it's BURNT, it's gone, so you don't have PC to search the trunk. It's BURNT, so there's no PC that any more exists in the car.
Only in Massachusetts
Here's a lame caselaw from last week.
Stop a car, detect the odor of burnt marijuana. Because it's BURNT, it's gone, so you don't have PC to search the trunk. It's BURNT, so there's no PC that any more exists in the car.
Only in Massachusetts
I have a lot of respect for law enforcement officers, and sometimes a few bad apple gets the best of my emotions.
Weather to make Marijuana legal or not is not within my capabilities of topic, nor is the legality of searching a car.
I just want to have the ability to say no to a search ( although I will always say yes if I am not in a hurry) and not be harassed with ludicrous tickets. ( i never got any) because I refused a search.
#37
#38
Originally Posted by vhtran
If you are still fighting for your ticket, here's a tip. I just saw a Lowell cop (in uniform) driving a souped up TC with no gap between the rubber and fenders, plus to that is an exhaust. Take picture of that and u'll win for sure hahah.
#39
So I was driving through good ole Weston the other day when I was pulled over by the town cop. Keep in mind that when I got pulled over, I was not speeding and I had my sunroof and windows down.
The cop told me that I was being pulled over for an altered exhaust. He then proceeds to ask me to roll up my window so that he can check my tint. This may be a silly question, but did I have to roll it up for him just because he "assumed" it was illegal?
I do not talk poorly about police officers because the "good" ones are providing public safety, but its starting to really bother me that some police officers just love to use their authority. I mean...I was just strolling along, not being reckless, not being loud and had the windows down just minding my own business. Do these sour bunches have nothing better to do but to pull over people who are not threatening the general public?
The cop told me that I was being pulled over for an altered exhaust. He then proceeds to ask me to roll up my window so that he can check my tint. This may be a silly question, but did I have to roll it up for him just because he "assumed" it was illegal?
I do not talk poorly about police officers because the "good" ones are providing public safety, but its starting to really bother me that some police officers just love to use their authority. I mean...I was just strolling along, not being reckless, not being loud and had the windows down just minding my own business. Do these sour bunches have nothing better to do but to pull over people who are not threatening the general public?
Last edited by virtualbong; 05-26-2009 at 02:26 PM.
#40
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
event, exhaust, expired, inspection, ma, maid, massachusetts, meter, modified, police, state, surchargeable, ticket