Northern California San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, San Jose, Pleasanton, etc.

Traffic Court questions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #31  
ja3n3ss's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: bay area/sacto
eh still driving crazy huh? i learned my lesson when i got pwned on 5.
drive safer man youre in the city.
radar detectors only tell you they got ya now, i just have my valentine on so i know my speed when they tag me... last time i got tagged i just pulled over and he let me go =D LPD tends to follow me alot.
fight it you have no choice with that many points, in sacramento extensions will not allow you to go to traffic school, im pretty sure its the same in frisko.
if you fight it before you go to a lawyer go trail by written decl. if you lose you can request a trial by denovo and get a court date. its like starting fresh, then you can get a lawyer.
just write the letter saying you didnt want to endager anyone by driving slower than the flow
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
good luck man... drive safer...
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #32  
g35 chippie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
First of all, the arguement that someone had to drive fast so as not to endanger the safety of persons or property is ludicrous. Second of all, even if the judge would allow that arguement, that arguement is a mute point if he was cited for 22349(a)- exceeding 65 MAXIMUM, or 22349(b)-exceeding 55 MAXIMUM on two lane undivided highway. Safety is not element the officer has to prove when citing a maximum speed limit, only that it was exceeded.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #33  
johnsonhuang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
my "not signaling to change lane" got dismissed so one more ticket to go!

Question for you traffic school guru's.

according to the court, my traffic school renew is on 10/3/2008, meaning i can take traffic school after that date again.. but i got the ticket on 9/16/2008. I havent went to court yet or requested for anything, can i still take traffic school even though i am allowed to now, but i got the ticket BEFORE it was renewed?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Machine Head
19 Inch
3
Mar 16, 2016 08:55 PM
SilverG123
Engine - Electrical
1
Sep 4, 2015 01:12 PM
INVADER_6MT
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
0
Sep 1, 2015 10:19 PM
G35Sask
Intake & Exhaust
16
Aug 5, 2015 10:17 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.