2nd Annual Bay Area G Dyno Day

Subscribe
Feb 15, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #16  
Andrew, let me know if you need any help with anything. PM me or email me skeletoncru@sbcglobal.net ...Eloy

1. MOTOP
2. dklau33
3. drsifu1 (Vinh wanted early)
4. skeleton_cru
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #17  
1. MOTOP
2. dklau33
3. drsifu1 (Vinh wanted early)
4. skeleton_cru
5. o snap its eric
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #18  
1. MOTOP
2. dklau33
3. drsifu1 (Vinh wanted early)
4. skeleton_cru
5. o snap its eric
6. TunaRollZ (my350z.com)
7. GQ 350z (my350z.com)
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 12:24 AM
  #19  
1. MOTOP
2. dklau33
3. drsifu1 (Vinh wanted early)
4. skeleton_cru
5. o snap its eric
6. TunaRollZ (my350z.com)
7. GQ 350z (my350z.com)
8. abcgum
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 01:48 AM
  #20  
1. MOTOP
2. dklau33
3. drsifu1 (Vinh wanted early)
4. skeleton_cru
5. o snap its eric
6. TunaRollZ (my350z.com)
7. GQ 350z (my350z.com)
8. abcgum
9. SweetG
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 02:46 AM
  #21  
Are 4wd cars restricted from joining in on this opportunityy?
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 03:22 AM
  #22  
2wd dyno, sorry.
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #23  
Quote: I like the idea of Dynapak better, since it is more accurate on automatics
Why is a Dynopak dyno more accurate for autos?

I would think it is not as true of a reading because you don't have your wheels attached, which contributes to some HP loss. So the readings might be a little higher than a roller dyno, but I guess it doesn't matter. HP is all relative and for us you want to run on the same type of dyno to get results that you can compare to previous runs.
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #24  
Well I just got my car yesterday, but I'm curious to see what this thing puts down stock...count me in!

1. MOTOP
2. dklau33
3. drsifu1 (Vinh wanted early)
4. skeleton_cru
5. o snap its eric
6. TunaRollZ (my350z.com)
7. GQ 350z (my350z.com)
8. abcgum
9. SweetG
10. Mastermind050
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #25  
Quote: Why is a Dynopak dyno more accurate for autos?

I would think it is not as true of a reading because you don't have your wheels attached, which contributes to some HP loss. So the readings might be a little higher than a roller dyno, but I guess it doesn't matter. HP is all relative and for us you want to run on the same type of dyno to get results that you can compare to previous runs.
Dynojet is inertia dyno and manuals get a headstart because there's no torque conversion. It might not be the exact explanation, but should give you the idea.
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #26  
Awesome... looks like we got 10. Are we going to do a prepayment thing like last time so people will be discouraged from flaking?
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #27  
Quote: Are we going to do a prepayment thing like last time so people will be discouraged from flaking?
Good call.
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #28  
I'll start collecting payments this Friday. Once I have 10 payments in my Paypal, I'll call John and make final arrangements. I hope people wouldn't mind if I ask to send me $40+% for Paypal fees.
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #29  
Quote: I'll start collecting payments this Friday. Once I have 10 payments in my Paypal, I'll call John and make final arrangements. I hope people wouldn't mind if I ask to send me $40+% for Paypal fees.
I don't mind.
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2005 | 04:17 PM
  #30  
You can also send me a personal check if Paypal is an issue. PM me for the info.
Reply 0