Watch out for a yellow STi POLICE car...
#17
#20
Originally Posted by ChiefyMan
Please feel free to expand on your knowledge of this tree.
We studied a couple cases. Two of interest was:
1.) Murder case in wisconsin I believe. They never found the body, and there was insufficient evidence to prove a murder took place. They had a suspect. They transported him in a van. While in the van driving to HQ for interrogation, the two cops (I believe were athiests), who knew that the suspect was a devout catholic, talked to each other about how the murder victim would not get a proper catholic burial, etc, etc. (I forget what else they talked about). As a result of this conversation, the suspect apparently couldn't live with it anymore, and confessed to the murder, and led the police to where he ditched the body.
It was determined that since the suspect was not read his miranda rights yet he could not be interrogated yet. It was also determined that even tho the cops were talking to each other, their conversational topic was meant to illicit a response from the suspect. It was determined that this was in actuality an illegal interrogation. The confession and the location of the body were not allowed. Since there was lack of evidence to prove a murder happened, (they couldn't use the confession or the body), the suspect could not be charged with murder! Sad, but true.
2.) I forget the exact details of this other one, (it was a while ago, ok? ) Anyways, it was in the bay area. The police were investigating some leads for a case. They didn't have enough support to get a warrant, but wanted to have a "look around". So they burglarized this guy's office. While nosing around, they stumbled upon a photo in his desk or something like that which placed his father (IIRC) at the scene of the crime. The father was never a supsect at this point in time, as they thought it was his son.
It was determined that this photograph was obtained as a result of an illegal search/siezure, and was not admissable in court as evidence.
Anyways, I was saying this is probably apples to oranges, but I was thinking (based on the previous ticket mentioned earlier), that if the cop first committed an illegal act, then anything that happens as a result of it would be inadmissable.
#21
#22
from personally being employed in the law enforcement field, when cops try to ENTRAP a person (because thats what it is, it just depends on what state you live in to apply as such) is when the city needs money and turn to law enforcement to make up ways to fine citizens, which i personally its a croc of BS....questions in vancouver CA, is racing that bad that cops had to resort to taunting drivers to race so they can fine them, and whats the penalty for falling for their trick???
#23
#25
#27
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RemmyZero
V36 DIY
10
04-23-2018 11:13 AM