Picture Share Pics of your or others' rides!

Finally - the look I've been wanting. PICS!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 07-05-2005, 04:17 PM
shodog's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Those wheels look sharp and not Blingy. It looks like your car could have come from the factory that way
 
  #17  
Old 07-05-2005, 08:15 PM
headpaneer's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Other than the little dimples in the spokes, I like those wheels. Hey, they’re Rays, right? Not bad, at all. Congratulations. One of these days, I’ll get some new wheels. -sigh-
 
  #18  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:54 AM
skeleton_cru's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Bay, Cali
Posts: 17,096
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Sedan
Originally Posted by G35papa
you got any wider shots of the side of the car?
^^+1^^
 
  #19  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:09 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Wow. I like them, especially on the black G. Do you guys think I'd have any fender rubbing issues with these rims since I'm on the coupe springs (.5" drop)?
 
  #20  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:29 PM
vodkarocket's Avatar
Modded Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
Wow. I like them, especially on the black G. Do you guys think I'd have any fender rubbing issues with these rims since I'm on the coupe springs (.5" drop)?
It looks like the original thread poster also lowered his car with the Z springs.

He states that his camber is set to -1.3 to accomodate the wheels...
 
  #21  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:38 PM
cloudy6MT's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I mounted the Z track wheels I had coupe springs and it was too tall for my taste. Fender gap was still huge and the rear wheels stuck out too much b/c of the offset (+33). After the drop, the wheels tucked in a little more and after going to align my car to -1.3 rear camber, the rear wheels are now flush with the fender.

So my suggestion is to go with a set of 2004.5 shocks/springs (make sure you check the part#s). The ride is a bit harsher, but it now the car feels like it is riding on rails. Its actually scary now how the car loves to turn no matter how fast you're going.
 
  #22  
Old 07-07-2005, 09:57 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by cloudy6MT
When I mounted the Z track wheels I had coupe springs and it was too tall for my taste. Fender gap was still huge and the rear wheels stuck out too much b/c of the offset (+33). After the drop, the wheels tucked in a little more and after going to align my car to -1.3 rear camber, the rear wheels are now flush with the fender.
What's "huge" in your book? I was completely fine with the 2 finger gap in the rear with the stock Sport springs My last car was a 96 Maxima and it had 1.5" H&R drop and the gaps were still significantly bigger that my G's with coupe springs

I really don't want to take the car any lower because I don't want to be eating tires or having to buy $400 A-arms just to correct the camber problems.
 
  #23  
Old 07-07-2005, 10:52 PM
DDRGirle's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Yorrrkkk
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So let me get this straight, did u do the suspension and drop it on an AWD g? Cuz i thought that wasn't possible otherwise u'll kill ur car. Im lovinggg the JLAudio, top of the line system right there in ur car. I wanted to add those to my car, but my guy friends keep tellin me that my car is gunna catch on fire cuz the bose amp suxs ***** n doesnt like other amps being with it ( or some crazy thing like that)
 
  #24  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:39 AM
Gthree5 6MT's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phillips Ranch, Southern California
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that combination looks GREAT! Very clean...congrats! ^-^
 
  #25  
Old 07-08-2005, 08:42 PM
klg35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Walnut, the one in So-Cal
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
got the same wheels recently, but running 245/45s all around.......looks are subjective, I like the sleeper look....i had the coupe 18s and imo, looked pretty cool......however, a bonus with track wheels are that they are 18.1lbs front and 18.6lbs rear......can you say UNSPRUNG weight?! the coupe 18s were 25lbs.........i can feel car the accel/decel much quicker......to answer that question...it's by Rays engineering...the ones that makes Volks......if i've known the weight of rims earlier, i would've gotten them first over the headers, y-pipe or crank pulley.....peace.
 
  #26  
Old 07-08-2005, 11:55 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by klg35
got the same wheels recently, but running 245/45s all around.......looks are subjective, I like the sleeper look....i had the coupe 18s and imo, looked pretty cool......however, a bonus with track wheels are that they are 18.1lbs front and 18.6lbs rear......can you say UNSPRUNG weight?! the coupe 18s were 25lbs.........i can feel car the accel/decel much quicker......to answer that question...it's by Rays engineering...the ones that makes Volks......if i've known the weight of rims earlier, i would've gotten them first over the headers, y-pipe or crank pulley.....peace.
Not only is it a reduction in unsprung weight, it's a reduction in rotational weight. You get a better ride, better braking, better steering response, and better acceleration. It's a win win situation from every angle.
 
  #27  
Old 07-09-2005, 10:05 AM
cotmfk's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking good, IMO!
 
  #28  
Old 07-09-2005, 03:24 PM
klg35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Walnut, the one in So-Cal
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
What's "huge" in your book? I was completely fine with the 2 finger gap in the rear with the stock Sport springs My last car was a 96 Maxima and it had 1.5" H&R drop and the gaps were still significantly bigger that my G's with coupe springs

I really don't want to take the car any lower because I don't want to be eating tires or having to buy $400 A-arms just to correct the camber problems.
hey, your call sign sounds vaguely familiar....maxima.org since you had a maxima before? i was 2kseman (2000 SE 5sp).....
anyhow, track wheels=go fast mod.......
 
  #29  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:04 PM
court's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: la
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the track rims i have no fitmit issues. I have Tein S-tech and it lowered the car 1.9frt and 1.3rr. even at the track while race no rubbing.
 
  #30  
Old 09-05-2005, 03:58 AM
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
ENVautoDetailing.com

iTrader: (47)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Posts: 9,257
Received 136 Likes on 92 Posts
That looks bad a$$, i love the track wheels, i was thinkin of getting all 4 front's of those and getting em painted gold for my ivory pearl 05' sedan.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Finally - the look I've been wanting. PICS!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.