unichip vs. technosquare = who wins?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-04-2006, 11:40 PM
YO_its_KENN's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
unichip vs. technosquare = who wins?

i've been debating for a while now and cant seem to make up my mind. i was wondering if those with experiences could help me decide.

I am n/a with a few mods: jwt pop charger w/ztube, UR pulleys, 5/16 motordyne spacer, strups headers, FI high flow cats, FI exhaust.

what does unichip offer that technosquare doesnt and vise-versa.

if price wasn't an option, which route would you guys go. which has more power gains.

PLEASE HELP
 
  #2  
Old 12-22-2006, 12:41 AM
rlwjr1's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bump
 
  #3  
Old 12-22-2006, 01:34 AM
OH6 G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,343
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
I was wondering the same. Anyone ??
 
  #4  
Old 12-22-2006, 10:01 AM
s2k_g35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i seen a lot of post regarding the unichip chip.
I have order it already it should arrive shortly.
I'll install it some time in end of Jan.

so I'll go for the Unichip.
 
  #5  
Old 12-22-2006, 10:14 AM
sjc1789's Avatar
Florida G35 Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cooper City, FL
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
have you thought about a utech??
 
  #6  
Old 12-22-2006, 12:00 PM
ballisticus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remember that our ECU's are learning/adaptive machines. A piggyback like the Unichip/UTEC use offset values or a derivative of the ECU's instructions to the car. The tune establishes the offset values based on the conditions and state of the ECU at that time. Say you want 13.1:1 and the piggyback brings it there. Great! you drive away all smiles.

But the ECU has been programmed by its masters at the factory to have the car run at 14.5:1 for emissions and fuel economy regulations. So it senses 13.1:1 at the O2 sensor and guess what? It starts slowly leaning out the mix by reducing the injector duty cycle and basically cancels out your piggyback offset and tune. That is why with motorcycle piggybacks, you disconnect the O2 sensors. If we could do this with cars, we would, but OBDII says no.

The above applies to closed-loop mode only. With the UTEC being active only at WOT or so (openloop), the above won't affect it. But to say that a piggyback is going to give you flat A/F ratios where you dial them across all throttle positions and RPM is false. Only a reflash can reprogram the brain to want more fuel and/or timing across all operating conditions.

It's expensive, but the best option is to do both. Get the TS reflash first to get the 7100 rev limit, 100% throttle at redline, timing bump, and get the fuel in the ballpark. That alone will be worth it, believe me. If you still want to blow more money, then get a UTEC or Unichip piggyback so you can play and tweak all day with the WOT openloop tune.
 

Last edited by ballisticus; 12-22-2006 at 02:33 PM.
  #7  
Old 12-23-2006, 08:18 PM
Andy@Performance's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ballisticus
Remember that our ECU's are learning/adaptive machines. A piggyback like the Unichip/UTEC use offset values or a derivative of the ECU's instructions to the car. The tune establishes the offset values based on the conditions and state of the ECU at that time. Say you want 13.1:1 and the piggyback brings it there. Great! you drive away all smiles.

But the ECU has been programmed by its masters at the factory to have the car run at 14.5:1 for emissions and fuel economy regulations. So it senses 13.1:1 at the O2 sensor and guess what? It starts slowly leaning out the mix by reducing the injector duty cycle and basically cancels out your piggyback offset and tune. That is why with motorcycle piggybacks, you disconnect the O2 sensors. If we could do this with cars, we would, but OBDII says no.

The above applies to closed-loop mode only. With the UTEC being active only at WOT or so (openloop), the above won't affect it. But to say that a piggyback is going to give you flat A/F ratios where you dial them across all throttle positions and RPM is false. Only a reflash can reprogram the brain to want more fuel and/or timing across all operating conditions.

It's expensive, but the best option is to do both. Get the TS reflash first to get the 7100 rev limit, 100% throttle at redline, timing bump, and get the fuel in the ballpark. That alone will be worth it, believe me. If you still want to blow more money, then get a UTEC or Unichip piggyback so you can play and tweak all day with the WOT openloop tune.
I also agree. Further tuning can be done beyond a reflash but with the Utec, it is a preset tune, it does not factor in elevation changes, weather, etc. Reflash retains all the factory sensors the ECU will adjust to driving enviroment for optimal performance.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Accessories-Vendor
39
11-30-2021 02:28 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: unichip vs. technosquare = who wins?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM.