Which has yet to be proven to make more power than non-revup.

 

Again, the 280 is just a number. It's all relative.

I can bring you to a mustang dyno and your car would only be putting down about 215rwhp, but it wouldn't be any slower, right?

Maybe you're needing some FI

 

1+

I'd be more than happy with those gains.

.

 

Pay attention at the power drop after peak power on both a revup and non-revup. There's your difference.

.

 

Yes, I agree with u, but at the same time peak power has been proven over and over is about same.

 

Area under the curve!!!

Vlad post up your dyno for comparison

 

ok lets see, this a dyno graph of OCG35 who has a 04 sedan 5AT with similar mods to the OP.
Lets look at the initial numbers before the tune.

AT 3500 rpm non-rev up is making ~160 hp
AT 3500 revup is making 150hp

At 4000 rpm non-revup is making ~185hp
At 4000 rpm revup is making ~179

At 5000 rpm non-revup is making ~227
At 5000 rpm revup is making ~218

At 5500 rpm non-revup is making ~240
At 5500 rpm revup is making ~231

At 6000 rpm non-revup is making ~250
At 6000 rpm revup is making ~249

Am i missing something that u are seeing?

 

I don't have my stock graph anymore. I do remember making 262hp stock.

 

^^ Vlad, im sure you know that its not really fair to compare two completely different cars. Mike has more modifications than the OP does too. HFC/Test Pipes make a big different with a tune.

HFC/TP can change the curve alot, including peak power & mid-range.

 

Back then I don't think mike had his HFCs. The point is that the revup/non-revup curve is very similar to each other. I do agree with u that power drop off after 6200rpm revups have the edge.

 

Lower drop-off past peak power FTMFW

 

^see i never argued that.

 

I know... just bragging about it

 

I still have enough mods to pwn yo a$$

 

psh

My dyno feels even weaker now



146wtq/246whp ftl