For that matter, the HR has a very similar curve to a DE.

Just when the DE plateau's out and starts dropping, the HR keeps climbing.

the Rev-up is like a step between the two (although it's obviously much closer to the DE's curve)

 

?

sorry jus wanted to use that smiley

 

yup, i just wanted to brag.

 

:waves FI stick menacingly in Vlad's general direction....:

 

 

By the next time we race, we'll see about that

.

 

Very true, especially the first two sentences.

 

I feel compelled to chime in about the TS reference... it is a very worthwhile option. I've had both and am a big fan of Osiris – its what I run now... but I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend TS for those that have a desire to use them. Lets face it; they were about the only option for a long time (that means something to me anyway).

Osiris is definitely more versatile... multiple maps, ease/convenient tuning options (especially once they rollout the end user option)... it does have more flexibility than TS - but no one can really knock TS performance results, they have produced great gains for many, many cars over the years.

If someone were to ask me if I would recommend TS, I say yes without a doubt… if I were asked which I would recommend between Osiris and TS, I’d have to say Osiris – but I’d never fault anyone for TS.

Okay – just felt the need to state it… back to your cyber race/power battles.

 

Dynapack haha I dont even want to get started, he would be even more dissapointed

 

several of the N/A cars in this thread (that have been on that dyno) do pretty well at the track... some of us rarely (if ever) lose to N/A VQs.

I guess my point is - the machine doesn’t really matter... as always, the gains are the only thing its good for or comparing results to others on the same day and same machine (such as dyno days)...

 

I still don't think you get it

Numbers are just numbers. One number can be 200 whp, the other can read 260 whp. At the end of the day, those numbers don't mean a thing until tuning is involved for better/after results.

There's no such thing as disappointment on initial numbers.

.

 

Seriously. I always heard that Church's dyno put out numbers on the high side but almost 280whp from basic bolt-ons?? I don't think so.

Henry, I think what 2C is saying is that the OP is putting so much emphasis on his peak number. If he dynoed his car on a dynojet and got 250ish whp, he might hang himself.

 

Church's website explains this all to you before you go in. It says on his website to basically expect to read higher because it is a dynapack, and why reading higher does not matter, it is only the gains you need to worry about.

 

+1

My power goal is 350whp on a mustang; that'll read close to 400 on Church's dyno... but I wouldnt ever dynotune on a mustang. Dynapacks are unrivaled for tuning.

 

I think the person doing the tuning is WAY more important than what kind of dyno they use. That's why Sam @ GTM will always be the only one to tune my G.