Your numbers look great, actually! You would be very disappointed by your whp numbers on a Dyno Dynamics, which reads extremely low! Numbers are just numbers when it comes to the different dynos, it's how the car performs afterwards that truly matters, and displays the benefit of a well tuned car. I do agree that the Mustang dyno should be avoided for tuning our cars! I didn't put **** down on a Mustang dyno (just wanted to see what my G would pull)! My G was damn low on the Dyno Dynamics too (245whp) (it's known as the "heartbreaker" though). And yet on another Dyno I pulled at least 280whp. LOL. I have the same mods as you, but I have HFC's and a UTEC. Anyway, just thought I would post my experiences with the different dynos. Peace, Friends!

 

I'm guessing you did around 225-230 on the mustang?

 

in the end.. smilie saves the day by solving everybody's problem... glad everything worked out

 

Here's how GTM does NA 280rwhp on a dynojet: http://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=366519

 

^those gains are insane. And im sure most cams are responsible for 50% of those gains. Thanks for the link Hector. Over 30whp over stock and keeping the weight to stock is great accomplishment. One more year baby!

 

those are some agressive cams...

 

Really? I run cams more aggressive than that in my DSM and its perfectly streetable. Do the VQ's not draw much vacum off throttle to start with?

Back in the day a 20g turbo was "aggressive" and now people are running GT35R's on their daily drivers :shrugs:

 

Cobb Tuning Access Port sounds promising...

 

No problem bro. I'm telling you, Sam is a pretty good tuner/builder. Just cuz GTM does primarily FI projects doesn't mean they won't do a NA build. I would love to see one of you NA guys give Sam a chance to work on and tune one of your rides.

 

he really expected 280 with those mods lololol

Just had to LOL =]