Is it ok for front and rear tires to be different?
Ok guys I'm in a bit of a dilema here. The sizes I need to get the Nitto - Invo tires are not available in Saudi or UAE. So I'm going to install Michelin – Pilot Sport PS2.
Now here's my problem, they have the PS2's for my rear tires but not the front.
So would it be ok to install the Mitchelin PS2's on the rear and something different like continental on the fronts? would I get any issues or problems?
Now here's my problem, they have the PS2's for my rear tires but not the front.
So would it be ok to install the Mitchelin PS2's on the rear and something different like continental on the fronts? would I get any issues or problems?
Why does good traction on the rear tires matter more than on the front on a FWD?
Trending Topics
Just think of it this way - if your front wheels break traction, at least you can still control them. Unless you're drag racing a fwd car, you want the better tires on the back. Better meaning more tread, less worn, or just better.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but your explanation...explains very little.
I've driven a FWD vehicle (as I'm sure you have) and when the front tires go, it's a pain. Whenever I got new tires, they would always rotate the front to the back and give me two new fronts...
Strange and I concede... well, partially...
It wasn't your statement that lacked merit, just your explanation.
The reason for always putting the better tires on the back are driver feel. In a FWD vehicle, when the front tires lose traction (assuming the worse tires are up front), you can feel the car losing traction and react sooner and better. When they are on the back, you feel the car losing traffic a bit too late and simply have to attempt a save from a fishtail.
http://www.michelinman.com/tire-care/tire-basics/
(video link is at the bottom of the page)
It wasn't your statement that lacked merit, just your explanation.

The reason for always putting the better tires on the back are driver feel. In a FWD vehicle, when the front tires lose traction (assuming the worse tires are up front), you can feel the car losing traction and react sooner and better. When they are on the back, you feel the car losing traffic a bit too late and simply have to attempt a save from a fishtail.
http://www.michelinman.com/tire-care/tire-basics/
(video link is at the bottom of the page)
Last edited by Rutland; Dec 14, 2009 at 02:48 PM.
Im running KDW2's in the front at about 30% tread and Toyo T1R's in the rear with about 80% tread in the rears (already went through the KDW2 rears) and ive had no troubles at all.
Strange and I concede... well, partially...
It wasn't your statement that lacked merit, just your explanation.
The reason for always putting the better tires on the back are driver feel. In a FWD vehicle, when the front tires lose traction (assuming the worse tires are up front), you can feel the car losing traction and react sooner and better. When they are on the back, you feel the car losing traffic a bit too late and simply have to attempt a save from a fishtail.
http://www.michelinman.com/tire-care/tire-basics/
(video link is at the bottom of the page)
It wasn't your statement that lacked merit, just your explanation.

The reason for always putting the better tires on the back are driver feel. In a FWD vehicle, when the front tires lose traction (assuming the worse tires are up front), you can feel the car losing traction and react sooner and better. When they are on the back, you feel the car losing traffic a bit too late and simply have to attempt a save from a fishtail.
http://www.michelinman.com/tire-care/tire-basics/
(video link is at the bottom of the page)
WOW!!!

I never knew that, thanks for the education. I just rotated my girl's tires putting the better tires on the front.
I assume this applies for winter as well, putting better tires on the rear?
It didn't make sense at first look to put worse tires on a FWD on the front, but all the "research" (i.e. googling) I've done says that regardless of drive, put them on the back, I would assume that's for winter as well.
I still find it a bit counterintuitive (especially starting and stopping), but from a stability (especially in a turn) standpoint, it makes some sense.
I still find it a bit counterintuitive (especially starting and stopping), but from a stability (especially in a turn) standpoint, it makes some sense.
Strange and I concede... well, partially...
It wasn't your statement that lacked merit, just your explanation.
The reason for always putting the better tires on the back are driver feel. In a FWD vehicle, when the front tires lose traction (assuming the worse tires are up front), you can feel the car losing traction and react sooner and better. When they are on the back, you feel the car losing traffic a bit too late and simply have to attempt a save from a fishtail.
http://www.michelinman.com/tire-care/tire-basics/
(video link is at the bottom of the page)
It wasn't your statement that lacked merit, just your explanation.

The reason for always putting the better tires on the back are driver feel. In a FWD vehicle, when the front tires lose traction (assuming the worse tires are up front), you can feel the car losing traction and react sooner and better. When they are on the back, you feel the car losing traffic a bit too late and simply have to attempt a save from a fishtail.
http://www.michelinman.com/tire-care/tire-basics/
(video link is at the bottom of the page)









