R2C Intake, Fast Intentions exhaust and Dyno tune …

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #16  
E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 55
Terry speaketh the truth

I look at it in this sense: if someone claims they make "XXX" HP on a dyno, then they run a time of "XX.XX" at "XXX.XX" mph which doesn't jive with their "XXX" HP, then they "should" know that the dyno number is untrue. After factoring in certain conditions, of course
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 12:14 AM
  #17  
stevej88's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: TAMPA
I dyno'd 278 whp with stillen exhaust, hfc, gen 2 intakes... 17" tires. I'm now running with 19" tires and minus the intakes. I also use 93 octane. What do you use?

265 is a good number though, probably on par with what i've been seeing locally.

some say they are dynoing 300+ with Technosquare on pump gas but I highly doubt that
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 09:07 AM
  #18  
ANMVQ's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 951
Likes: 9
From: Waltham Ma,
Good to see someone with a X get a tune.. Good numbers. I have R2C intakes( Going in tomorrow) and Berks HFC I hope a see a little higher of a number when I get mine tuned..
HFC's> cat back
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 09:26 AM
  #19  
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 42
From: Kuwait
Still don't understand how HR Z's are getting well above 300whp with simple bolt ons yet we're stuck with 280-290whp max.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #20  
eatsleepdrum's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth
Originally Posted by Q8y_drifter
Still don't understand how HR Z's are getting well above 300whp with simple bolt ons yet we're stuck with 280-290whp max.
drivetrain loss?
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #21  
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 42
From: Kuwait
How much of a difference is that? It's a pretty big difference in whp. around 30whp at least.
Anyhow, I know the Z comes with a carbon fiber drive shaft, other than that, everything is the same in terms of drivetrain.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #22  
eatsleepdrum's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth
From what I've been told with auto trans we're losing 10-15% HP from engine to rear wheels... and AWD is worse!
and i'm still trying to debate over r2c versus injen cai --- ahhhhhh
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 05:32 AM
  #23  
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 42
From: Kuwait
I understand the drivetrain loss on auto and manual, which BTW is actually around 20% for auto and 15% for manual. what I meant was how much of a difference in percentage between an auto HR Z vs. an auto HR sedan? (or manual vs manual for that matter)...

What I'm wanting to know is how there is such a big difference between the HR Z and HR sedan in terms of power output when there is no difference in the engine and the only drivetrain difference is the carbon fiber driveshaft vs. the metal one in ours.
But even then, does loosing drivetrain weight add hp or simply increase response? I mean surely changing to a lightweight flywheel wouldn't actually increase max whp would it? If that's the case, then even the light weight drive shaft in the Z wouldn't make a difference in power. Is it the ECU then?
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 10:22 AM
  #24  
G3LU5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 406
Likes: 2
From: Roanoke, VA
Originally Posted by Q8y_drifter
I understand the drivetrain loss on auto and manual, which BTW is actually around 20% for auto and 15% for manual. what I meant was how much of a difference in percentage between an auto HR Z vs. an auto HR sedan? (or manual vs manual for that matter)...

What I'm wanting to know is how there is such a big difference between the HR Z and HR sedan in terms of power output when there is no difference in the engine and the only drivetrain difference is the carbon fiber driveshaft vs. the metal one in ours.
But even then, does loosing drivetrain weight add hp or simply increase response? I mean surely changing to a lightweight flywheel wouldn't actually increase max whp would it? If that's the case, then even the light weight drive shaft in the Z wouldn't make a difference in power. Is it the ECU then?
The light weight flywheel actually helps b/c the force it takes to spin the flywheel is much less which in turn "robs" less hp to the wheels. I have noticed even with my hardly modified 06 g coupe 6MT that my clutch feels like it slips a little under very heavy acceleration, (easiest to feel it if going up a steep hill at 15mph and stomp it) so I do believe if anyone with the 6MT would just order and install a better clutch that you would see much better numbers on a dyno. But this is my opinion. Anyone agree?
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #25  
eatsleepdrum's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth
Are those nickel chrome, black chrome, or just polished R2Cs?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gip
G35 Cars
6
Aug 24, 2015 05:31 PM
linedr89
G35 Cars
2
Aug 17, 2015 05:11 PM
G35Sask
Intake & Exhaust
16
Aug 5, 2015 10:17 PM
sick_sixspeed
New Members Check In
7
Jul 20, 2015 10:25 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.