R2C Intake, Fast Intentions exhaust and Dyno tune …
Terry speaketh the truth 
I look at it in this sense: if someone claims they make "XXX" HP on a dyno, then they run a time of "XX.XX" at "XXX.XX" mph which doesn't jive with their "XXX" HP, then they "should" know that the dyno number is untrue. After factoring in certain conditions, of course

I look at it in this sense: if someone claims they make "XXX" HP on a dyno, then they run a time of "XX.XX" at "XXX.XX" mph which doesn't jive with their "XXX" HP, then they "should" know that the dyno number is untrue. After factoring in certain conditions, of course
I dyno'd 278 whp with stillen exhaust, hfc, gen 2 intakes... 17" tires. I'm now running with 19" tires and minus the intakes. I also use 93 octane. What do you use?
265 is a good number though, probably on par with what i've been seeing locally.
some say they are dynoing 300+ with Technosquare on pump gas but I highly doubt that
265 is a good number though, probably on par with what i've been seeing locally.
some say they are dynoing 300+ with Technosquare on pump gas but I highly doubt that
Good to see someone with a X get a tune.. Good numbers. I have R2C intakes( Going in tomorrow) and Berks HFC I hope a see a little higher of a number when I get mine tuned..
HFC's> cat back
HFC's> cat back
How much of a difference is that? It's a pretty big difference in whp. around 30whp at least.
Anyhow, I know the Z comes with a carbon fiber drive shaft, other than that, everything is the same in terms of drivetrain.
Anyhow, I know the Z comes with a carbon fiber drive shaft, other than that, everything is the same in terms of drivetrain.
From what I've been told with auto trans we're losing 10-15% HP from engine to rear wheels... and AWD is worse!
and i'm still trying to debate over r2c versus injen cai --- ahhhhhh
and i'm still trying to debate over r2c versus injen cai --- ahhhhhh
I understand the drivetrain loss on auto and manual, which BTW is actually around 20% for auto and 15% for manual. what I meant was how much of a difference in percentage between an auto HR Z vs. an auto HR sedan? (or manual vs manual for that matter)...
What I'm wanting to know is how there is such a big difference between the HR Z and HR sedan in terms of power output when there is no difference in the engine and the only drivetrain difference is the carbon fiber driveshaft vs. the metal one in ours.
But even then, does loosing drivetrain weight add hp or simply increase response? I mean surely changing to a lightweight flywheel wouldn't actually increase max whp would it?
If that's the case, then even the light weight drive shaft in the Z wouldn't make a difference in power. Is it the ECU then?
What I'm wanting to know is how there is such a big difference between the HR Z and HR sedan in terms of power output when there is no difference in the engine and the only drivetrain difference is the carbon fiber driveshaft vs. the metal one in ours.
But even then, does loosing drivetrain weight add hp or simply increase response? I mean surely changing to a lightweight flywheel wouldn't actually increase max whp would it?
If that's the case, then even the light weight drive shaft in the Z wouldn't make a difference in power. Is it the ECU then?
I understand the drivetrain loss on auto and manual, which BTW is actually around 20% for auto and 15% for manual. what I meant was how much of a difference in percentage between an auto HR Z vs. an auto HR sedan? (or manual vs manual for that matter)...
What I'm wanting to know is how there is such a big difference between the HR Z and HR sedan in terms of power output when there is no difference in the engine and the only drivetrain difference is the carbon fiber driveshaft vs. the metal one in ours.
But even then, does loosing drivetrain weight add hp or simply increase response? I mean surely changing to a lightweight flywheel wouldn't actually increase max whp would it?
If that's the case, then even the light weight drive shaft in the Z wouldn't make a difference in power. Is it the ECU then?
What I'm wanting to know is how there is such a big difference between the HR Z and HR sedan in terms of power output when there is no difference in the engine and the only drivetrain difference is the carbon fiber driveshaft vs. the metal one in ours.
But even then, does loosing drivetrain weight add hp or simply increase response? I mean surely changing to a lightweight flywheel wouldn't actually increase max whp would it?
If that's the case, then even the light weight drive shaft in the Z wouldn't make a difference in power. Is it the ECU then?Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




