Cobb Post MAF hose
awaiting for ur review . .
now i don't why i have a feeling that these wud get issues with fitment!
anyways, if everything went well with ya , i may order them
now i don't why i have a feeling that these wud get issues with fitment!
anyways, if everything went well with ya , i may order them
Last edited by Glover997; Jun 10, 2011 at 06:26 PM.
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
these are great tubes guys. In all honesty, probably exactly the same as Cobb hoses. i have had both. No difference in performance but the HPS seems a bit more flexible...and includes nice t-bolt clamps. Get the HPS if you dont want intakes.
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
The only intakes I havent tried are the stillen gen 3 and injen CAI. No desire at all to try injen. Stillen loses me at cutting the core and rubbing issues. Takeda CAI I imagine are very similar to SG3. Gains are probably there, but mostly in the high end. The 1 time a month I might need the higher rpm power isnt worth it to me.
well let me know man, Ill definately take those off your hands. I just took off my JWT pop chargers. Im gonna try and sell them when i get my post up.
When I put on my stock boxes, i think i like them better HA!
shoot me a pm
When I put on my stock boxes, i think i like them better HA!
shoot me a pm
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
will do...
yes, i agree. Stock boxes are better than any intake and you notice it after putting the boxes back in. Adding HPS/Cobb and even better. i just miss the look of intakes in my engine bay and the growl they produce.
yes, i agree. Stock boxes are better than any intake and you notice it after putting the boxes back in. Adding HPS/Cobb and even better. i just miss the look of intakes in my engine bay and the growl they produce.



