Video Share Post or find Infiniti-related videos here!

Finally, The Theory of Evolution is Disproved.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
realgone's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Widdle ya into kindling
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 0
Finally, The Theory of Evolution is Disproved.

<object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZFG5PKw504&rel=1&border=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZFG5PKw504&rel=1&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object>
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
alphamatt's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 5
From: SFV
I noticed after he openned that peanut butter he didn't wait a few million years, in fact i cant remember the last time i opened a bag of chips and the expiration date listed was in BCE. I dont think even evolution is strong enough to break down the additives they put in food to keep it edible nowadays.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #3  
cerr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
LOL he opened the can of peanut butter like a monkey was going to jump out of it or something. ignorant ppl annoy the fvck out of me.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #4  
6MTzer's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,786
Likes: 1
From: I am a Traveler of Both Time and Space
Premier Member

Maybe our world actually exists in a jar of peanut butter.

 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #5  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
He does have a point. IF life started, as evolutionists say it did, then why don't we see new life on this planet?

Some scientists theorize that certain amino acids (present in space and the primordial earth), together with heat and "energy" (lightning?) created life on the earth.

Others think that it was "seeded" by passing comets and/or planets or by asteroids impacting the earth. If this is true, where did THAT life come from?
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #6  
mt7rabbit's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,098
Likes: 8
From: Austin, TX
that is the most retarded thing I've seen all day. I'd like to kick that man in the junk.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #7  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by mt7rabbit
that is the most retarded thing I've seen all day. I'd like to kick that man in the junk.
You know, there were people (the POPE) who wanted to cut OFF Leonardo's junk because he said the center of the solar system was NOT the earth.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #8  
realgone's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Widdle ya into kindling
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Texasscout
He does have a point. IF life started, as evolutionists say it did, then why don't we see new life on this planet?
We do.

New Species
New Life
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #9  
cerr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
honestly, i see no point in his theory. it states: "I open a food product and no new species jumps out at me". The problem w/ this is two things; 1) evolution takes millions and millions of years to produce a complex life form and 2) no one is putting un-opened bags of chips and cans of peanut butter under the microscope to look for simple, single-cell life forms.

honestly, i don't even know enough about the origins of evolution to say if it's possible to generate new simple organisms with the conditions in food service. however, i do know that you can't expect to find them if you don't look in the right places or if you don't conduct your experiment w/ the right tools.

i do agree there are very real possibilities that the seeds could have been planted by outsides sources ... BUT I can tell you for damn sure that was not done by God 7,000 yrs ago. And that is a seperate theory than what these nut jobs are preaching.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #10  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by realgone
Those are soooo cool!

But I mean the kind of primordial life forms that would have been produced at the beginning. One celled organisims, new forms of alge etc. Why don't we see that at the point of lightning strikes? The trouble is, no one can prove it either way.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #11  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by cerr
honestly, i see no point in his theory. it states: "I open a food product and no new species jumps out at me". The problem w/ this is two things; 1) evolution takes millions and millions of years to produce a complex life form and 2) no one is putting un-opened bags of chips and cans of peanut butter under the microscope to look for simple, single-cell life forms.

honestly, i don't even know enough about the origins of evolution to say if it's possible to generate new simple organisms with the conditions in food service. however, i do know that you can't expect to find them if you don't look in the right places or if you don't conduct your experiment w/ the right tools.

i do agree there are very real possibilities that the seeds could have been planted by outsides sources ... BUT I can tell you for damn sure that was not done by God 7,000 yrs ago. And that is a seperate theory than what these nut jobs are preaching.
I agree, his example was ridiculous. The kind of life that would be formed, you would never "see" it anyway. It would be single celled organisms and the like.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #12  
realgone's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Widdle ya into kindling
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Texasscout
Those are soooo cool!

But I mean the kind of primordial life forms that would have been produced at the beginning. One celled organisims, new forms of alge etc. Why don't we see that at the point of lightning strikes? The trouble is, no one can prove it either way.
Here you go

New Algae
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #13  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by realgone
Here you go

New Algae
Wow......


That's spooky!
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #14  
realgone's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Widdle ya into kindling
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Texasscout
Wow......


That's spooky!
No, it is "a new evolutionary lineage."

It is Science and Evolution.

You asked for it and I have provided the information to you. If you want to deny Science, that is your right. I myself believe in Science, but there are those that refuse to learn more or accept Science simply because it contradicts with certain religious convictions.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #15  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by realgone
No, it is "a new evolutionary lineage."

It is Science and Evolution.

You asked for it and I have provided the information to you. If you want to deny Science, that is your right. I myself believe in Science, but there are those that refuse to learn more or accept Science simply because it contradicts with certain religious convictions.
I can neither "confirm or deny" evolution. You can't prove it either. The "new life forms" you posted, they can't prove that they are new or whether they just haven't found them until now.

I just like to think that life was not just an "accident". Just like you wouldn't like to think of your self as an "accident". You would hope that you were part of a plan by your parents. I think I was a part of a plan by God.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 PM.