Finally, The Theory of Evolution is Disproved.
Finally, The Theory of Evolution is Disproved.
<object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZFG5PKw504&rel=1&border=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZFG5PKw504&rel=1&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object>
I noticed after he openned that peanut butter he didn't wait a few million years, in fact i cant remember the last time i opened a bag of chips and the expiration date listed was in BCE. I dont think even evolution is strong enough to break down the additives they put in food to keep it edible nowadays.
He does have a point. IF life started, as evolutionists say it did, then why don't we see new life on this planet?
Some scientists theorize that certain amino acids (present in space and the primordial earth), together with heat and "energy" (lightning?) created life on the earth.
Others think that it was "seeded" by passing comets and/or planets or by asteroids impacting the earth. If this is true, where did THAT life come from?
Some scientists theorize that certain amino acids (present in space and the primordial earth), together with heat and "energy" (lightning?) created life on the earth.
Others think that it was "seeded" by passing comets and/or planets or by asteroids impacting the earth. If this is true, where did THAT life come from?
Originally Posted by mt7rabbit
that is the most retarded thing I've seen all day. I'd like to kick that man in the junk.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Texasscout
He does have a point. IF life started, as evolutionists say it did, then why don't we see new life on this planet?
New Species
New Life
honestly, i see no point in his theory. it states: "I open a food product and no new species jumps out at me". The problem w/ this is two things; 1) evolution takes millions and millions of years to produce a complex life form and 2) no one is putting un-opened bags of chips and cans of peanut butter under the microscope to look for simple, single-cell life forms.
honestly, i don't even know enough about the origins of evolution to say if it's possible to generate new simple organisms with the conditions in food service. however, i do know that you can't expect to find them if you don't look in the right places or if you don't conduct your experiment w/ the right tools.
i do agree there are very real possibilities that the seeds could have been planted by outsides sources ... BUT I can tell you for damn sure that was not done by God 7,000 yrs ago. And that is a seperate theory than what these nut jobs are preaching.
honestly, i don't even know enough about the origins of evolution to say if it's possible to generate new simple organisms with the conditions in food service. however, i do know that you can't expect to find them if you don't look in the right places or if you don't conduct your experiment w/ the right tools.
i do agree there are very real possibilities that the seeds could have been planted by outsides sources ... BUT I can tell you for damn sure that was not done by God 7,000 yrs ago. And that is a seperate theory than what these nut jobs are preaching.
Originally Posted by realgone
But I mean the kind of primordial life forms that would have been produced at the beginning. One celled organisims, new forms of alge etc. Why don't we see that at the point of lightning strikes? The trouble is, no one can prove it either way.
Originally Posted by cerr
honestly, i see no point in his theory. it states: "I open a food product and no new species jumps out at me". The problem w/ this is two things; 1) evolution takes millions and millions of years to produce a complex life form and 2) no one is putting un-opened bags of chips and cans of peanut butter under the microscope to look for simple, single-cell life forms.
honestly, i don't even know enough about the origins of evolution to say if it's possible to generate new simple organisms with the conditions in food service. however, i do know that you can't expect to find them if you don't look in the right places or if you don't conduct your experiment w/ the right tools.
i do agree there are very real possibilities that the seeds could have been planted by outsides sources ... BUT I can tell you for damn sure that was not done by God 7,000 yrs ago. And that is a seperate theory than what these nut jobs are preaching.
honestly, i don't even know enough about the origins of evolution to say if it's possible to generate new simple organisms with the conditions in food service. however, i do know that you can't expect to find them if you don't look in the right places or if you don't conduct your experiment w/ the right tools.
i do agree there are very real possibilities that the seeds could have been planted by outsides sources ... BUT I can tell you for damn sure that was not done by God 7,000 yrs ago. And that is a seperate theory than what these nut jobs are preaching.
Originally Posted by Texasscout
Those are soooo cool!
But I mean the kind of primordial life forms that would have been produced at the beginning. One celled organisims, new forms of alge etc. Why don't we see that at the point of lightning strikes? The trouble is, no one can prove it either way.
But I mean the kind of primordial life forms that would have been produced at the beginning. One celled organisims, new forms of alge etc. Why don't we see that at the point of lightning strikes? The trouble is, no one can prove it either way.
New Algae
Originally Posted by Texasscout
Wow......
That's spooky!
That's spooky!
It is Science and Evolution.
You asked for it and I have provided the information to you. If you want to deny Science, that is your right. I myself believe in Science, but there are those that refuse to learn more or accept Science simply because it contradicts with certain religious convictions.
Originally Posted by realgone
No, it is "a new evolutionary lineage."
It is Science and Evolution.
You asked for it and I have provided the information to you. If you want to deny Science, that is your right. I myself believe in Science, but there are those that refuse to learn more or accept Science simply because it contradicts with certain religious convictions.
It is Science and Evolution.
You asked for it and I have provided the information to you. If you want to deny Science, that is your right. I myself believe in Science, but there are those that refuse to learn more or accept Science simply because it contradicts with certain religious convictions.
I just like to think that life was not just an "accident". Just like you wouldn't like to think of your self as an "accident". You would hope that you were part of a plan by your parents. I think I was a part of a plan by God.



ignorant ppl annoy the fvck out of me.
