Looking for specific sedan weight specs
#1
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coupe 6MT
Looking for specific sedan weight specs
Hey all,
I'm looking for the weight specs on my sedan, a 2003.5. All I have found so far is the weight distribution, 52% front and 48% rear. Nice. But I also need to know the sprung weight - total and at each wheel. I think if I have these figures it will keep me busy for a while. Thanks for all your help!
I'm looking for the weight specs on my sedan, a 2003.5. All I have found so far is the weight distribution, 52% front and 48% rear. Nice. But I also need to know the sprung weight - total and at each wheel. I think if I have these figures it will keep me busy for a while. Thanks for all your help!
#2
#4
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coupe 6MT
Originally Posted by ttrank
If I recall the 03 and 04 (w/ leather) weigh 3369lbs. I could weigh one of my stock sport wheels for you one of these days but I would guess ~45-55lbs each so take 180-220 off the 3369. Not sure if the 3369 includes fluids, I would guess not.
#7
Trending Topics
#13
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coupe 6MT
Originally Posted by usingthejohn
Are you possibly inquiring because you plan on serious track duty for your sedan?
So, yeah, I'm just wasting time finding info. Perhaps suspension design could be my senior project (fingers crossed) before I get my BS in ME. And no, no flying cars. The CG and Roll center could be affected if I drop it too much, in a negative way. I have a set of 350Z revised shocks and springs and a set of Hotchkis springs awaiting install. So far I plan to put the Hotchkis spring up front and Z spring in the rear. So unlike the common Z front/coupe rear, I'll have an even lower front and just a low rear, if that makes sense. Or I could run the Hotchkis at all four but that may be too low for the rear (a possible 1.8" drop).
#14
Don't forget about the effects of upgrading sway bars when dealing with body roll forces and roll centers. Also, be careful not to drop the front too much lower than the rear, or you could affect weight transfer. One thing I've noticed from tracking my g is that with the brakes having such good initial bite, it's easy to induce an unanticipated amount of brake dive which causes the front end to push quite a bit (and brakes to heat up), and trying to correct it with the throttle is tricky because now the back end is light. With the car already raked on lower front springs, you could be in a brake dive stance while static, which may only exacerbate the weight transfer from rear to front when you do hit the brakes.
Of course, most of this usually goes away after the first few laps, as you get the feel of the car and the track and find the best line.
Of course, most of this usually goes away after the first few laps, as you get the feel of the car and the track and find the best line.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coupe 6MT
^ Cool. Thanks for the tip. I don't imagine it to be too bad on the brake dive side, as the front will be a little over a half inch lower than rear - but that only gets rid of the cosmetic larger front wheel gap. The Hotchkis springs are also a little tougher - 340 lbs/in - as opposed to the Z 314 lbs/in springs. I thought the higher spring rate up front could better offset the obscenely high (IMO) rate of the stock Z springs at 427. I may try doing the Hotchkis all the way around just to see how it feels and if my car will make it around the city that low. Otherwise it will be all Z springs and a set of Hotchkis springs for sale...