neg camber

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-26-2009, 03:18 PM
MikeGrote's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Draper, UT
Posts: 1,193
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
neg camber

is 1.7 degrees of neg camber too much for the front tires? i have the spc front a arm kit, but i didnt put the hub spacers on yet cause i wanted to see if i would really need them or not. i think my other front is just under 1 deg neg camber. i have the arms maxed out. i guess my options are to install the spacers to get them both in spec. or add a little neg camber to the other side so they are even at 1.7 deg of neg camber. what do you guys think? more than likely ill be going lower later on sometime.
 
  #2  
Old 05-26-2009, 08:06 PM
Q45tech's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Tires are designed to operate over a range of -0.5 to +0.5 camber. Extra negative camber is dialed in when the suspension design cannot maintain these ranges under cornering loads.
 
  #3  
Old 05-26-2009, 08:24 PM
MikeGrote's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Draper, UT
Posts: 1,193
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
ok, but ive heard some guys asking for 3 deg of negative camber at alignment shops on fairly dedicated track cars. i understand i wouldnt want that much, but is 1.7 going to kill my tread life?
 
  #4  
Old 05-26-2009, 10:40 PM
RST531's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So.Cal (626)
Posts: 1,646
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
on my alignment sheet oem specs are between -1.2 to +0.3. i would think -1.7 shouldnt kill your tires badly.

i would also like to know if -1.7 or -2 is bad.
 
  #5  
Old 05-26-2009, 11:17 PM
MikeGrote's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Draper, UT
Posts: 1,193
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
ill check my alignment sheet when i get home on friday, it has the oem spec window on there as well. but if my memory serves me well, i think it said what you have there. honestly, id like to be at about -1 on both sides. -2 is getting pretty extreme though, at least for me
 
  #6  
Old 05-27-2009, 09:25 PM
SuperStezzyG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: cali
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RST531
on my alignment sheet oem specs are between -1.2 to +0.3. i would think -1.7 shouldnt kill your tires badly.

i would also like to know if -1.7 or -2 is bad.

+ 1 i would also like to know if -1.7 or -2 is bad???
 
  #7  
Old 05-27-2009, 11:47 PM
eurodre's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Socal 818, CA
Posts: 15,140
Received 535 Likes on 296 Posts
-1.6 is still ok for the front, i was told this by the place i got aligned, the rear is -1.8 for an ok range
 
  #8  
Old 05-28-2009, 12:00 AM
Vrod-Mike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My fronts are at -1.5 because I was lazy and didn't put the SPC spacers in and after about 4k I can see that my tires are wearing uneven so I'll be putting the spacers in and fixing the alignment.
 
  #9  
Old 05-28-2009, 12:21 AM
eurodre's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Socal 818, CA
Posts: 15,140
Received 535 Likes on 296 Posts
^^its not just the neg camber messing with your tires, toe has more of an effect on uneven tire wear
 
  #10  
Old 05-28-2009, 12:59 AM
RST531's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So.Cal (626)
Posts: 1,646
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by eurodre
-1.6 is still ok for the front, i was told this by the place i got aligned, the rear is -1.8 for an ok range
ya -1.8 is still within spec (-1.9 to -0.9) for the rear, so that should be ok for good tire wear.
 
  #11  
Old 05-28-2009, 01:24 AM
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Cali --> 818
Posts: 13,068
Received 101 Likes on 66 Posts
1.7 is not a lot for the fronts. Just make sure the toe is within spec (as minimal as possible).
 
  #12  
Old 05-28-2009, 01:45 AM
vash_g35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Beach/Buena Park
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eurodre
^^its not just the neg camber messing with your tires, toe has more of an effect on uneven tire wear
+ 1
 
  #13  
Old 05-28-2009, 07:47 AM
Vrod-Mike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eurodre
^^its not just the neg camber messing with your tires, toe has more of an effect on uneven tire wear
My car was aligned and the only thing not within spec is the front camber.
 
  #14  
Old 05-28-2009, 08:15 AM
gzywzy1k's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im having a similar problem. my tires are wearing down on the inside track of the tire. so do i need to go with a positve degree of camber? also can i do this with the stock arms or do i have to buy the camber kit from stillen or wherever?
 
  #15  
Old 05-28-2009, 09:20 AM
str8dum1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
i have -1.8 with in spec toe and the insides are worn almost bald in ~9000 miles. i'm goin to reduce that to 1.5 or lesswith my next alignment
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: neg camber



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 PM.