Calling for the Fastest 5AT NA Coupe times Please
#31
Originally Posted by bosssho
Keep up the honest posting guys!
To the last guy...Listen...I know the WWW brings out heroes, but let's have some damn faith here huh...not all people who post are smoking crack and full of $hit...
Now back to our regularly scheduled thread...It seems like the stock, or almost stock Coupes in 5AT trim are topping out at 14.2 at 99...the 99 shows me the power is there for a better time...14.0-14.1, but what are all your 60' times? 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3? That will tell the tale.
These cars seem to love Forced Induction so if you guys added a turbo and a Blower you should see low 13s.
To the last guy...Listen...I know the WWW brings out heroes, but let's have some damn faith here huh...not all people who post are smoking crack and full of $hit...
Now back to our regularly scheduled thread...It seems like the stock, or almost stock Coupes in 5AT trim are topping out at 14.2 at 99...the 99 shows me the power is there for a better time...14.0-14.1, but what are all your 60' times? 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3? That will tell the tale.
These cars seem to love Forced Induction so if you guys added a turbo and a Blower you should see low 13s.
#32
Originally Posted by Samson
Just like the muscle cars of yore, each individual car comes from the factory with slightly different motor specs. Some motors have slightly more clearance on the rings, have the right combination of rods and pistons that will give that little extra performance boost.
If you read the car magazines, performance times can vary wildly with the same model. I've seen 05 Mustang GTs go from 4.9 0-60 to 5.8 0-60 with an automatic transmission by the same magazine. Elevation, humidity, air density etc. can all affect performance. I wouldn't doubt the times at all. They certainly are not unreasonable given the general performance of both the Coupe and Sedan.
If you read the car magazines, performance times can vary wildly with the same model. I've seen 05 Mustang GTs go from 4.9 0-60 to 5.8 0-60 with an automatic transmission by the same magazine. Elevation, humidity, air density etc. can all affect performance. I wouldn't doubt the times at all. They certainly are not unreasonable given the general performance of both the Coupe and Sedan.
Cool picture Samson. I'm a gunnersmate in the navy I wish those things were still in service. It's amazing that a 9 gun broadside will cause a couple thousand tons to shift 15 degrees through the water when fired.
#33
Originally Posted by Dsskyline
Cool picture Samson. I'm a gunnersmate in the navy I wish those things were still in service. It's amazing that a 9 gun broadside will cause a couple thousand tons to shift 15 degrees through the water when fired.
It seems the Navy is a little worried that they don't have enough heavy fire power. The Iowa class would alleviate that. Their hydrodynamic hulls are still fast and keep up with the fleet. They also can take hits from Exocet missles, mines and torpedoes without sinking unlike many of the aluminum hulled ships. Their 16"/50 caliber guns can fire a 2,800 pound projectile almost 24 miles.
If you want to take a look-see at the proposal, you can see it for yourself at:
http://www.combatreform.com/battleships.htm
Go Navy and go Blue and Gold! Thanks for serving our country.
#34
Here are my times....not the fastest, but pretty damn good for street tires..
https://g35driver.com/forums/attachm...5&d=1160164182
60"---2.125
1/8---9.137 at 78.03MPH
1/4---14.097 at 98.60MPH
https://g35driver.com/forums/attachm...5&d=1160164182
60"---2.125
1/8---9.137 at 78.03MPH
1/4---14.097 at 98.60MPH
Last edited by Nismo G; 10-21-2006 at 12:47 PM.
#35
Originally Posted by Nismo G
Here are my times....not the fastest, but pretty damn good for street tires..
https://g35driver.com/forums/attachm...5&d=1160164182
60"---2.125
1/8---9.137 at 78.03MPH
1/4---14.097 at 98.60MPH
https://g35driver.com/forums/attachm...5&d=1160164182
60"---2.125
1/8---9.137 at 78.03MPH
1/4---14.097 at 98.60MPH
#36
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bean_VQ35DE
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
49
08-03-2015 05:17 PM