View Poll Results: Have you taken your car down the drag strip?
YES
36
48.00%
NO
39
52.00%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll
Post up your best 1/4 mile ET/MPH
#46
Originally Posted by ma_sha1
My first & only FI trip to the track, so close to be in the 12's.
Body type: 05 Sedan Awd
Transmission: 5AT
Modifications: HKS Supercharger, VB, Stillen Catback, Wilwood BBK
Track location: New England dragway, Epping, NH
Conditions: ~54 degrees
RT: 0.519
60': 1.970
ET: 13.213
MPH: 102.88
Trap speed is low, reflecting HKS S/C isn't as high power as TT but it put every bid of power down with the AWD to get a good 13.2 ET, on 225/45 18 all season street tires. No big fat tires, no DR, no slipping. Before HKS S/C, my best was about 14.8
Body type: 05 Sedan Awd
Transmission: 5AT
Modifications: HKS Supercharger, VB, Stillen Catback, Wilwood BBK
Track location: New England dragway, Epping, NH
Conditions: ~54 degrees
RT: 0.519
60': 1.970
ET: 13.213
MPH: 102.88
Trap speed is low, reflecting HKS S/C isn't as high power as TT but it put every bid of power down with the AWD to get a good 13.2 ET, on 225/45 18 all season street tires. No big fat tires, no DR, no slipping. Before HKS S/C, my best was about 14.8
But I am a bit confused by the timeslip. I'm very close to that trap myself, but there's no way I could kit a low 13.2 with a high 1.9 sixty foot. If I can get a high 1.9, I'd be looking at a 13.5ish ET.
I guess the longer gears of the AT are helping here.
#47
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Good times man. It's nice to see some sedans out at the track.
But I am a bit confused by the timeslip. I'm very close to that trap myself, but there's no way I could kit a low 13.2 with a high 1.9 sixty foot. If I can get a high 1.9, I'd be looking at a 13.5ish ET.
I guess the longer gears of the AT are helping here.
But I am a bit confused by the timeslip. I'm very close to that trap myself, but there's no way I could kit a low 13.2 with a high 1.9 sixty foot. If I can get a high 1.9, I'd be looking at a 13.5ish ET.
I guess the longer gears of the AT are helping here.
#49
#50
Originally Posted by DaveB
He's got a good bit more power than you, but the AWD and 5AT driveline drag is sucking out MPH on the far end of the track. I'd imagine a RWD 5AT would probably see an additional 2-3mph since it doesn't have the additional static and rotational weight of three additional axles, a transfer case, and an additional differential.
If you look at the top25 list on my350z, there's a guy named DayBlueZ that has run looow 13's at 103mph, but his 60 wasn't crazy. If you look at the 6MT's with similar traps and 60's, their ET's are a few tenths higher.
#51
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I didn't intend to directly compare his and my cars. I've just noticed that the AT's can have lower ET's than the 6MT's for the same 60 and traps.
If you look at the top25 list on my350z, there's a guy named DayBlueZ that has run looow 13's at 103mph, but his 60 wasn't crazy. If you look at the 6MT's with similar traps and 60's, their ET's are a few tenths higher.
If you look at the top25 list on my350z, there's a guy named DayBlueZ that has run looow 13's at 103mph, but his 60 wasn't crazy. If you look at the 6MT's with similar traps and 60's, their ET's are a few tenths higher.
If someone runs high 13s in a G35 at a particular track, I am much more impressed if I see that other G35s were running low 14s at the same track (same day)...
I don't have to tell you this - you know... So to figure out how someone got a certain ET and had a certain 60' is futile.
Numbers are bogus unless they are against similar modded cars on the same day at the same place – this has always been my take (for FWIW)
#52
I understand, but that's when you're comparing cars or power. This list of top 25 times is a list of the top 25 ETs, period. No correction factor, or anything else. That basically means that if you're at a track like LACR, you're not getting on this list.
The guy that I am talking about specifically is DayBlueZ. His time is listed at a 13.170@103.19. His sixty is a 1.922. This is in an automatic z, on street tires. I know the guy; he's local, and he's cool as hell.
Compare that to another guy(Mojo Powered) that traps 103, and when he cut a 1.91 sixty, he hit a mid 13.3. That's a different of two tenths. That's in a 6MT.
The launches are close, within 3 thousandths of a second. The traps are close, within 13 hundredths of a mile an hour. Yet the ET's differ greatly. The cars are making similar power. The cars are getting out of the whole similarly. Larry(DayBlueZ) also has the 3.54 pumpkin. So the FD ratios are the same.
It just doesn't make sense to me. Having the 3.54 in the AT should make 3rd top out at somewhere around 93mph. He's trapping 103, so that means he's in 4th gear for a couple hundred feet, just like the 6MT. So both drivers are performing 3 shifts.
The guy that I am talking about specifically is DayBlueZ. His time is listed at a 13.170@103.19. His sixty is a 1.922. This is in an automatic z, on street tires. I know the guy; he's local, and he's cool as hell.
Compare that to another guy(Mojo Powered) that traps 103, and when he cut a 1.91 sixty, he hit a mid 13.3. That's a different of two tenths. That's in a 6MT.
The launches are close, within 3 thousandths of a second. The traps are close, within 13 hundredths of a mile an hour. Yet the ET's differ greatly. The cars are making similar power. The cars are getting out of the whole similarly. Larry(DayBlueZ) also has the 3.54 pumpkin. So the FD ratios are the same.
It just doesn't make sense to me. Having the 3.54 in the AT should make 3rd top out at somewhere around 93mph. He's trapping 103, so that means he's in 4th gear for a couple hundred feet, just like the 6MT. So both drivers are performing 3 shifts.
#53
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I understand, but that's when you're comparing cars or power. This list of top 25 times is a list of the top 25 ETs, period. No correction factor, or anything else. That basically means that if you're at a track like LACR, you're not getting on this list.
The guy that I am talking about specifically is DayBlueZ. His time is listed at a 13.170@103.19. His sixty is a 1.922. This is in an automatic z, on street tires. I know the guy; he's local, and he's cool as hell.
Compare that to another guy(Mojo Powered) that traps 103, and when he cut a 1.91 sixty, he hit a mid 13.3. That's a different of two tenths. That's in a 6MT.
The launches are close, within 3 thousandths of a second. The traps are close, within 13 hundredths of a mile an hour. Yet the ET's differ greatly. The cars are making similar power. The cars are getting out of the whole similarly. Larry(DayBlueZ) also has the 3.54 pumpkin. So the FD ratios are the same.
It just doesn't make sense to me. Having the 3.54 in the AT should make 3rd top out at somewhere around 93mph. He's trapping 103, so that means he's in 4th gear for a couple hundred feet, just like the 6MT. So both drivers are performing 3 shifts.
The guy that I am talking about specifically is DayBlueZ. His time is listed at a 13.170@103.19. His sixty is a 1.922. This is in an automatic z, on street tires. I know the guy; he's local, and he's cool as hell.
Compare that to another guy(Mojo Powered) that traps 103, and when he cut a 1.91 sixty, he hit a mid 13.3. That's a different of two tenths. That's in a 6MT.
The launches are close, within 3 thousandths of a second. The traps are close, within 13 hundredths of a mile an hour. Yet the ET's differ greatly. The cars are making similar power. The cars are getting out of the whole similarly. Larry(DayBlueZ) also has the 3.54 pumpkin. So the FD ratios are the same.
It just doesn't make sense to me. Having the 3.54 in the AT should make 3rd top out at somewhere around 93mph. He's trapping 103, so that means he's in 4th gear for a couple hundred feet, just like the 6MT. So both drivers are performing 3 shifts.
The only real statistical analysis that is worthwhile is what happens on the same day at the same track or same dyno – measure-in specific variables and draw an educated hypothesis to what works and what doesn’t… That’s what I have done – it works for me.
#54
Originally Posted by OCG35
I only ever compare same day, same track, & same day, same dyno... I'm as analytical as you - My title in the field I'm in has included "analyst" as well... I fully understand your need and desire to make sense of the numbers... and to an extent it is a viable measure of performance... however it is not enough to ponder why one car does what another cannot...
The only real statistical analysis that is worthwhile is what happens on the same day at the same track or same dyno – measure-in specific variables and draw an educated hypothesis to what works and what doesn’t… That’s what I have done – it works for me.
The only real statistical analysis that is worthwhile is what happens on the same day at the same track or same dyno – measure-in specific variables and draw an educated hypothesis to what works and what doesn’t… That’s what I have done – it works for me.
#55
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I understand, but that's when you're comparing cars or power. This list of top 25 times is a list of the top 25 ETs, period. No correction factor, or anything else. That basically means that if you're at a track like LACR, you're not getting on this list.
The guy that I am talking about specifically is DayBlueZ. His time is listed at a 13.170@103.19. His sixty is a 1.922. This is in an automatic z, on street tires. I know the guy; he's local, and he's cool as hell.
Compare that to another guy(Mojo Powered) that traps 103, and when he cut a 1.91 sixty, he hit a mid 13.3. That's a different of two tenths. That's in a 6MT.
The launches are close, within 3 thousandths of a second. The traps are close, within 13 hundredths of a mile an hour. Yet the ET's differ greatly. The cars are making similar power. The cars are getting out of the whole similarly. Larry(DayBlueZ) also has the 3.54 pumpkin. So the FD ratios are the same.
It just doesn't make sense to me. Having the 3.54 in the AT should make 3rd top out at somewhere around 93mph. He's trapping 103, so that means he's in 4th gear for a couple hundred feet, just like the 6MT. So both drivers are performing 3 shifts.
The guy that I am talking about specifically is DayBlueZ. His time is listed at a 13.170@103.19. His sixty is a 1.922. This is in an automatic z, on street tires. I know the guy; he's local, and he's cool as hell.
Compare that to another guy(Mojo Powered) that traps 103, and when he cut a 1.91 sixty, he hit a mid 13.3. That's a different of two tenths. That's in a 6MT.
The launches are close, within 3 thousandths of a second. The traps are close, within 13 hundredths of a mile an hour. Yet the ET's differ greatly. The cars are making similar power. The cars are getting out of the whole similarly. Larry(DayBlueZ) also has the 3.54 pumpkin. So the FD ratios are the same.
It just doesn't make sense to me. Having the 3.54 in the AT should make 3rd top out at somewhere around 93mph. He's trapping 103, so that means he's in 4th gear for a couple hundred feet, just like the 6MT. So both drivers are performing 3 shifts.
-Sean
#56
'05 6MT Sedan
2005 6MT Sedan
Mods:
UR underdrive crank pulley
Ported Crawford plenum
Ported throttlebody
Ported lower intake
Crawford hedders
Crawford high flow cats
Fujitsubo exhaust system
3.917 gear ratio
Rogue Engineering shifter
Z-tube
K&N filter
275/30-19 Kumho SPT tires
No spare
6 gallons high test 105 unleaded race fuel
I've run a best of 13.45 @105.2 mph (2.07 60ft time)
I have run quite a few 13.50-13.70's
Mods:
UR underdrive crank pulley
Ported Crawford plenum
Ported throttlebody
Ported lower intake
Crawford hedders
Crawford high flow cats
Fujitsubo exhaust system
3.917 gear ratio
Rogue Engineering shifter
Z-tube
K&N filter
275/30-19 Kumho SPT tires
No spare
6 gallons high test 105 unleaded race fuel
I've run a best of 13.45 @105.2 mph (2.07 60ft time)
I have run quite a few 13.50-13.70's
#57
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Trap speed is the same way. If two guys trap 103mph in the same car, same gearing, similar power, but in wildly different conditions, it indicates the two cars at the times of the runs are making similar power.
The difference of the two run, I had some wheel spin on the 13.3 run,
the wheel spin will increase MPH quite a bit even you are not moving forward much, but because you are not moving, you've lost some time. Therefore, the higher MPH at the end even the ET is lower. I was running at 32 psi & a little spin happens. I lowered it to 27 psi & got rid off the spin.
I think most non AWD cars lauch with some wheel spin, therefore will have
higher MPH at the end. My best ET run, I had absolutely no spin. I've seen those muscle cars running ~13.3 with 116 trap speed, spining like crazy off the line which generated a lot of mph but doesn't get them to thefinish line faster.
If two cars both have Zero spin off the line, then may be you could compare
the two in power vs. MPH. But in reality, spin varies car to car & run to run,
thats why ET is more important, more consistant & more useful. If I allow my car to spin more, for example, pull the AWD fuse & run in RWD mode with my 225 street tire, I am sure I will get much higher MPH with lower ET.
Last edited by ma_sha1; 04-15-2007 at 01:12 PM.
#60
Originally Posted by ZXiMan2
2005 6MT Sedan
Mods:
UR underdrive crank pulley
Ported Crawford plenum
Ported throttlebody
Ported lower intake
Crawford hedders
Crawford high flow cats
Fujitsubo exhaust system
3.917 gear ratio
Rogue Engineering shifter
Z-tube
K&N filter
275/30-19 Kumho SPT tires
No spare
6 gallons high test 105 unleaded race fuel
I've run a best of 13.45 @105.2 mph (2.07 60ft time)
I have run quite a few 13.50-13.70's
Mods:
UR underdrive crank pulley
Ported Crawford plenum
Ported throttlebody
Ported lower intake
Crawford hedders
Crawford high flow cats
Fujitsubo exhaust system
3.917 gear ratio
Rogue Engineering shifter
Z-tube
K&N filter
275/30-19 Kumho SPT tires
No spare
6 gallons high test 105 unleaded race fuel
I've run a best of 13.45 @105.2 mph (2.07 60ft time)
I have run quite a few 13.50-13.70's
Congrats. I know my car will never trap 105mph.