Drag NHRA, IDRC, IHRA, NDRA

06 Z4M Roadster

Old May 6, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #1  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
06 Z4M Roadster

my G is out of commision now..so only slips from the M.

R/T 1.114 (iqnore bc it's only test and tune)
60' 2.063
330 5.756
1/8 8.776
MPH 82.37
1000 11.312
1/4 13.457
MPH 103.78
Temp: 68F

need a new thermostat, car is losing hp, my trap is way too low.

 

Last edited by IvoryGT; May 7, 2007 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #2  
muscarel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Very nice. I was just comparing the numbers (with a grain of salt) to that of the 2007 G35x someone brought to the track (in the sedan section). Same 60' time. 1/8 mile - G35x was just under 8.9 seconds at 78 compared to your 8.7 at 82. But the M must have long legs because while the G35x finished at 13.9, the M is a 1/2 second faster and 4 mph faster.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #3  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
here's a slip from drag times.

http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-Z4-M-Ro...lip-12116.html

my time is not where I want it to be...it should be at 13.2 @ 107mph

my trap of 103 is lower than my highest trap I had last summer of 105, I lost some hp due to a faulty thermostat...I will need to get it changed out then run again at the track.

Basically the M has more aggressive gears and 'maybe' weight slight less.

Also at 330hp it's higher than the G, though with a significantly lower torque.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #4  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
it looks like u squeezed that 13.4 from a good 60 time. I agree u should trap atleast 105mph with that kind of 60ft time.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #5  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
I don't care if that's a low trap or not; I'd love to trap >103mph

Good times regardless
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
thx. I think Im pretty good at the launch now...But these tires (PS2s) are not as grippy as the Re-01Rs I was running last summer.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #7  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
107 trap is very optimistic.

Under the right conditions, it should be anywhere around 105.

Not saying 107 stock is impossible, its just that you need a great run in a great track.

Good times by the way.

.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 7, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #8  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
I do realize that 13.2 is by a pro driver..probably powershifting(though not likely because R&T are against such practice) But I've achieved 13.37 last summer with much heavier tires (2lbs per wheel) and a 60' not as good as this season. With the right conditions (my service engine soon light not on and a new thermostat.) Im hoping to at least match my last summer stats and get at least 105 trap.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #9  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
here's why I love R&T
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2007 | 07:28 AM
  #10  
muscarel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
I wish car magazines would start showing 60' and 1/8th mile times and speeds. It gives a good picture of where the car's strengths are as opposed to just the 1/4 mile time and speed. FOr instance, this M ran a 13.2, but was the time that low because the driver ticked off a 1.8 sec 60' time? Or was it a 2.3 sec 60' time, but the car had brutal acceleration afterwards? Some of that you can tell from the trap speed but more info the better.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2007 | 08:00 AM
  #11  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by IvoryGT
thx. I think Im pretty good at the launch now...But these tires (PS2s) are not as grippy as the Re-01Rs I was running last summer.
I agree re launching with the PS2s.
Otherwise a great all around tire.
I also found them to be very sensitive to pressure changes.

...great post BTW;
especially since mine won't find it's way to the strip.

I had a blast with it at Mosport though
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #12  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
why not? Isn't there a good strip up there.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #13  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by IvoryGT
why not? Isn't there a good strip up there.
Sure...
I just prefer a track to the strip
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #14  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
yeah..the track is far from here...I'll do that later.

PS. does your car make a clicking sound around 3K rpm
 

Last edited by IvoryGT; May 8, 2007 at 05:07 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2007 | 06:25 PM
  #15  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Yup... It's the Double Vanos system
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.