Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Throttle Body Bore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 02:50 AM
  #1  
425skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Throttle Body Bore

Has anyone done any throttle body bore services on their coupe? I was thinking of getting the spacer and the MREV2, but if all that is still ultimately restricted by the throttle body size, why not bore it out more to allow more air flow? This could work in conjunction with the spacer and MREV2 collector or just be a great HP boost on its own. Or does the throttle body bore not work on our cars/not do-able/etc?
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #2  
citymunky's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (44)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 14
From: Chesapeake, VA/The Bronx, NY
The main reason I think nobody tried this already is because the work is not worth the HP gain. I can't see more than 3 WHP coming from the mod, but I have been wrong before.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #3  
425skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
My reasoning is that it is the restrictor that allows more air into the plenum. We can put all the spacers we want on the plenum and lower collector upgrades, etc, but the throttle body is technically the bottle neck. Now, I am not talking about rifling it or any of that silly stuff, I am talking about straight boring it out so the hole is bigger and allows more air to funnel in.

Any thoughts? I am really hoping someone's done this, cause it boasts big gains on a lot of other cars, especially American muscle.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #4  
brianyun's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 1
From: chicago illinois
ive enver heard of that. but it sounds like a good idea.

keep us updated if you do decide to do it
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #5  
App6MT's Avatar
Littering and...
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Your reasoning sounds logical and all but it is not restrictive at all.

There is a giant thread on my350z following someones plan for this.

People are making 1000whp+ on the stock throttle body, it's not restricted, sorry.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by App6MT
Your reasoning sounds logical and all but it is not restrictive at all.

There is a giant thread on my350z following someones plan for this.

People are making 1000whp+ on the stock throttle body, it's not restricted, sorry.
+1, not the bottle neck at all
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #7  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
there isn’t enough material to bore it out enough to make enough diff... besides, then you would need to replace the throttle plate... you might as well consider replacing the TB - I think a few have tried that... I don’t know the details though.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #8  
GreenGoblin's Avatar
The goblin resurrection
iTrader: (66)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 25,863
Likes: 187
From: In my garage
Premier Member

imo not worth it at all
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #9  
Xblackg35X's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 500
Likes: 1
you wont have to replace the plate because of the way it is bored. i had this done on my last car(mazda 6) and it made a little diffrence with a cold air intake.now our cars are way diffrent from the mazda 6 so i would have no idea what it would do. if my car would stop f**king up maybe i could try this. lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 08:22 PM
  #10  
425skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
I'm not a proponent of this. I am just wondering if anyone did this and what the results were. All I was saying is people do it on other cars, so wondering if anyone tried on ours.

And for the guy spittin out numbers: Just because someone makes 45674375676753675676789589 rwhp with the stock throttle body doesn't mean that it can't be modified to increase power.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #11  
425skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally Posted by OCG35
there isn’t enough material to bore it out enough to make enough diff... besides, then you would need to replace the throttle plate... you might as well consider replacing the TB - I think a few have tried that... I don’t know the details though.
I agree, it doesn't look big enough to have enough bored out to make a big difference.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #12  
App6MT's Avatar
Littering and...
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by pavelpg
And for the guy spittin out numbers: Just because someone makes 45674375676753675676789589 rwhp with the stock throttle body doesn't mean that it can't be modified to increase power.
Actually it does. Do some searches, this has been discussed already and it is by no way a restriction.

This isn't a 5.0 or whatever you want to compare it to. It's an entirely different setup.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #13  
425skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally Posted by App6MT
Actually it does. Do some searches, this has been discussed already and it is by no way a restriction.

This isn't a 5.0 or whatever you want to compare it to. It's an entirely different setup.
I stand corrected. That's why I was mentioning the bigger American muscle cars that actually get a boost from boring the TB. This answers it though.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #14  
Q45tech's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 5
From: Marietta, Georgia
Engineers who are assigned to each individual component are only allocated so much restriction. Why not measure the amount of restriction at WOT and differing rpms with a low cost Dwyer manometer [ebay].

Historically it appears that Nissan allows a max of 7" WC [H2O] for the TB at redline.
7" ~~= 1/4 psi or 1.7% restriction if you improve things by a few inches WC you gain 1.5 HP............maybe?

The problem is the electronic TB control software which is preprogrammed for stock TB............who will rewrite this so it functions with TCS.

7"
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 01:28 AM
  #15  
425skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Anyone bored the MREV2 inlets? I wonder if that has any effect. They seem to have really thick walls.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
prinny
The G-Spot
6
Nov 22, 2015 11:07 PM
Usman Ali
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
8
Oct 4, 2015 08:23 PM
Visionnn
Buying, Selling & Leasing Discussion
17
Oct 3, 2015 05:16 AM
w4kj4k
Wheels & Tires
4
Oct 2, 2015 07:57 PM
NyCrAzY
Brakes & Suspension
13
Oct 1, 2015 09:19 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM.