Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2005 CS Track Z: Stock vs. Crawford Plenum vs. Crawford Package Dynos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #1  
neffster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 0
2005 CS Track Z: Stock vs. Crawford Plenum vs. Crawford Package Dynos

Well here's the thread Doug promised me... http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=139611

It appears as if the 2005's with the newer lower intake manifold and the extra exhaust mods don't respond as well as the 2003 and 2004 cars did, but still not too shabby IMO.
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #2  
E_K's Avatar
E_K
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 9
From: Toh-rensa,Ahteesia,Ahcadia,Montree Pak, Longa Beacha
I've already responded on that thread. The gains from adding crawford cats, crawford headers, and a Borla TD were about 9 HP at top, which on one hand seems low from what you would expect, but on the other hand is still a definite gain. I've seen a few people not gain a thing from adding other brands of headers.

I agree that he can probably get some gains from leaning out his AFR up top. But I keep thinking that you have a better chance of making gains if you were too lean and a reflash adds more fuel, vs if you were too rich, and a reflash decreases the fuel.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 05:09 PM
  #3  
jnkirk1974's Avatar
Fastest G35 In Rockwall
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Rockwall, Texas (Near Dallas)
Originally Posted by E_K
I've already responded on that thread. The gains from adding crawford cats, crawford headers, and a Borla TD were about 9 HP at top, which on one hand seems low from what you would expect, but on the other hand is still a definite gain. I've seen a few people not gain a thing from adding other brands of headers.

I agree that he can probably get some gains from leaning out his AFR up top. But I keep thinking that you have a better chance of making gains if you were too lean and a reflash adds more fuel, vs if you were too rich, and a reflash decreases the fuel.
Adding all of that will only get you 9HP up top? Am I understanding you right (headers, cats amd exhaust)? I don't see how that's all you would get.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 09:24 PM
  #4  
neffster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 0
1. He got pretty close to 20rwhp and 10rwtq near redline and the area under the curve was nicely elevated above stock. At 3100rpms his hp and tq curves took a nice vertical leap and stayed there to redline. That is always a good thing IMO.

2. These mods were designed to work with the 2003 and 2004 Z's and G's. The fact that they still do ~20rwhp at redline on the newly modified 2005 6MT's shows that these mods really work! (Just not as good as on the earlier model years where the hp was lower).
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KruZZe
New Members Check In
14
Feb 27, 2023 05:04 PM
suby01
Not G35 Related
3
May 25, 2016 03:07 PM
AJC128
New Members Check In
1
Nov 1, 2015 11:55 AM
MrIP35
G35 Cars
6
Oct 25, 2015 11:13 PM
thechitoguy
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
12
Oct 1, 2015 05:25 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 AM.