300hp engine,stronger? Not really...
#46
11-23-2005, 01:19 AM
MRC.
I want to thank you for your research and reports on your comparison of the revup and non revup engine.
You have done, and are doing, what most are unable or havn't yet had the opportunity to do. Speculation can swirl around endlessly about the differences untill sombody actually opens one up and records the differences.
You are doing it!
Thank you. I'll keep watching in interest.
Tony
I want to thank you for your research and reports on your comparison of the revup and non revup engine.
You have done, and are doing, what most are unable or havn't yet had the opportunity to do. Speculation can swirl around endlessly about the differences untill sombody actually opens one up and records the differences.
You are doing it!
Thank you. I'll keep watching in interest.
Tony
#47
11-23-2005, 09:24 AM
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
MRC.
I want to thank you for your research and reports on your comparison of the revup and non revup engine.
You have done, and are doing, what most are unable or havn't yet had the opportunity to do. Speculation can swirl around endlessly about the differences untill sombody actually opens one up and records the differences.
You are doing it!
Thank you. I'll keep watching in interest.
Tony
I want to thank you for your research and reports on your comparison of the revup and non revup engine.
You have done, and are doing, what most are unable or havn't yet had the opportunity to do. Speculation can swirl around endlessly about the differences untill sombody actually opens one up and records the differences.
You are doing it!
Thank you. I'll keep watching in interest.
Tony
#48
11-23-2005, 11:51 AM
yeah let me know if aftermarket pistons can even work on my car... i think its pretty much safe to assume that your initial thoughts that there are no changes are wrong.. i guess ill just have to wait and find out.. also i would love an update with whats going on.. has the build started? are we gonna have to just assemble a stock block if the parts are different? im dying from suspense here
Last edited by paranormal; 11-23-2005 at 11:58 AM.
#49
11-26-2005, 05:59 PM
Originally Posted by s130turbo
for the 11th billion time, the stock pulley has no damper in it whatsoever - the small rubber isolator is there ONLY to quiet the noise of the accessory belts.
#50
04-15-2006, 11:49 PM
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Thank you,I have yet had free time for my Technician to mic the rod and piston.Upon closer inspection the rod end bolts are still bolts,however they are thicker.But they are not stud and bolt application.I will provide some details after the holidays.
Anymore insight?
Curious to know.
#51
04-16-2006, 12:50 AM
Originally Posted by DaveB
For the 11th trillion time, the fact that the rotating assembly is balanced (as most any late motor is) has nothing to do with the harmonics and torsional load placed on the crank as the combustion chambers are fired. I challange you to prove to me that the stock pulley is not a damper. I've got a whole load of information I can post up showing you that the crank pulley is in fact a damper. Every late model (1990+) engine I've ever seen has a elastomer ring sandwiched inside two seperate pulleys to form one unit and these pulleys are referred to as dampers. You'll also notice 4 to 5 dimples on the back side of the pulley. Those dimples balance the pulley to the weight of the crank.
I beg the question, if that elastomer ring was really there to quell belt noise (which makes sense), then why is the crank pulley the ONLY one with this design. All the other pulleys are solid one piece units. Does that really make sense?
A flywheel/torque converter act as a damper on drive end of the crank. So how are the harmonics and torsional load going to be negated on the other end of the crank? ....with a crank damper pulley.
I beg the question, if that elastomer ring was really there to quell belt noise (which makes sense), then why is the crank pulley the ONLY one with this design. All the other pulleys are solid one piece units. Does that really make sense?
A flywheel/torque converter act as a damper on drive end of the crank. So how are the harmonics and torsional load going to be negated on the other end of the crank? ....with a crank damper pulley.
#52
04-16-2006, 06:53 PM
Charter Member Florida G35 Club
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#53
04-16-2006, 07:08 PM
Originally Posted by JDM_CPV35
pardon my interruption, but it seems that EVERY G/Z that i have ever read/seen/heard of thats fi ends up with a blown motor. guess the vq doesn't work well under pressure
#55
04-16-2006, 11:06 PM
Originally Posted by G352NV
BTW Jimmy didnt this motor that MRC built also blow?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freeman186
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
1
09-06-2023 10:07 AM
AuAltima3.5
Exterior - Body Parts
0
09-13-2015 10:53 AM
