Who needs a powerband? G35 Beast
#16
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (37)
I don't think this car was built to go to the corner store to pick up tampons for your old lady.
The huge turbos take awhile to spool up and with the lower compression it likely makes a little less power than a stock G until he gets into boost.
Road coarse car LOL. Drag/highway monster is what his car is all about he knew with the huge turbos he would have major lag.
The huge turbos take awhile to spool up and with the lower compression it likely makes a little less power than a stock G until he gets into boost.
Yeah, I have the same concern with this setup. Isn't this car being setup as a road course car? If so, I would assume that more usable power down low would be more beneficial than making all of its power after 6000 rpm. Please correct me if I'm referring to the wrong car here.
Last edited by Sylvan lake V35; 05-08-2010 at 07:36 AM.
#19
#23
Really?
Kinda goes to show ya what crazy headflow and intake volume flow allow.....at same boost SP made 1248rwhp and were able to rev much higher(mustang dyno, and I don't care what dyno-to-dyno comparison is done, thats a big diff at same boost).
Now that someone really has crazy flowing turbos on a cosworth, I am sold that cosworth isn't worth it.
Tom
Kinda goes to show ya what crazy headflow and intake volume flow allow.....at same boost SP made 1248rwhp and were able to rev much higher(mustang dyno, and I don't care what dyno-to-dyno comparison is done, thats a big diff at same boost).
Now that someone really has crazy flowing turbos on a cosworth, I am sold that cosworth isn't worth it.
Tom
#24
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Carbon Fiber, TX
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Really?
Kinda goes to show ya what crazy headflow and intake volume flow allow.....at same boost SP made 1248rwhp and were able to rev much higher(mustang dyno, and I don't care what dyno-to-dyno comparison is done, thats a big diff at same boost).
Now that someone really has crazy flowing turbos on a cosworth, I am sold that cosworth isn't worth it.
Tom
Kinda goes to show ya what crazy headflow and intake volume flow allow.....at same boost SP made 1248rwhp and were able to rev much higher(mustang dyno, and I don't care what dyno-to-dyno comparison is done, thats a big diff at same boost).
Now that someone really has crazy flowing turbos on a cosworth, I am sold that cosworth isn't worth it.
Tom
I get my info from "the man" himself ...... I agree on cosworth so I dont get it, hopefully (I still change my plugs in 45 min with OEM plenum) .. Some have shown cosworth gains of 40whp before and after though.. With FI.......
#25
Well, if its the basic TT kits we mainly see on VQ's then its probably the choked down side of the exhaust wheel/compressor causing the exhaust mani pressure vs the intake pressure causing the gains seen when relieving some of the intake mani pressure when going to cosworth.
That being said, if you are running turbos that the exhaust side isn't the issue, we are right back to the intake being the bottleneck again.
GB on CJM intakes????? lol
Tom
That being said, if you are running turbos that the exhaust side isn't the issue, we are right back to the intake being the bottleneck again.
GB on CJM intakes????? lol
Tom
#27
*edit* the E92 M3 makes peak torque (300ft-lb) at 3900 RPM (at the flywheel)... at 1500 RPM I doubt it is even making close to 250WTQ...it MAYBE makes that much to the wheels at 3900 RPM. Also Its only .2 seconds faster 0-60 than the E46 M3...thats not a lot of difference.
Last edited by silver g; 05-09-2010 at 03:24 PM.
#28
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
#29
#30
the powerband is no different than Hal's street car, the intense widebody with the 76s, or any other supra making similar numbers. Thats just how the powerband looks like on small displacement motors with big turbos.
I have a 3000 rpm powerband. same as typical greddy/gtm guys. Mines just 5-8, compared to 3-6000.
Hals street car went 9.34 with 100 less HP. The G is alot heavier, but a potential low 10sec car for sure
I have a 3000 rpm powerband. same as typical greddy/gtm guys. Mines just 5-8, compared to 3-6000.
Hals street car went 9.34 with 100 less HP. The G is alot heavier, but a potential low 10sec car for sure