Future Models Questions, requests, info on Future Infiniti/Nissan Models

Nissan to shave vehicle weight by 15%

Old Jan 3, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
350Zed's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 8
From: Toronto, Canada
Lightbulb Nissan to shave vehicle weight by 15%

It looks like Nissan is planning on going on a diet instead of continuing the horse-power wars that are running rampant in the marketplace. That's a good thing, because you get both better performance and better economy.

Imagine a 330bhp 350Z/G35/G37 that weighs only 3200lbs!

335i-beating performance without the complexity of FI? Sign me up in 2010 when my G35 lease expires!

Source: leftlanenews.com
Nissan has announced an new initiative to reduce its vehicles' weight by an average of 15% — when compared to its 2005 lineup — over the next seven years. The reason for the weight reduction is to improve fuel economy in the face of stricter regulations worldwide.

The Japanese automaker hopes to the shed weight by working with suppliers to provide lighter weight materials and encouraging them to meet new efficiency targets.

Vehicle weight has ballooned over the past few decades, mainly due to required safety equipment.
The target of 15% would mean most vehicles would lose about 500 pounds. Not only would that weight reduction result in increased fuel economy, but would also boost performance — a win-win situation. In quarter-mile drag racing, every 100 pounds lost results in about .1 second gain, meaning the 350Z would be a mid-13 second car.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #2  
Jspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
CV35 6MT
I think that's the best thing to come out of the new CAFE standard.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #3  
chilibowl's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 21
From: Carteret, NJ
Nissan isnt playing games!
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
GreenGoblin's Avatar
The goblin resurrection
iTrader: (66)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 25,863
Likes: 187
From: In my garage
Premier Member

That sounds amazing
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 08:35 AM
  #5  
what2do's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
first they will get rid of the spare and put run flat.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
chilibowl's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 21
From: Carteret, NJ
Originally Posted by what2do
first they will get rid of the spare and put run flat.
LOL, thats BMW homie...thats BMW...only the Germans think of doing some sh*t like that
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #7  
SIR NUPE A LOT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: M.E.M.P.H.I.S/Smyrna, TN
When I was at the dealer the other day getting my car serviced, I commented on how heavy Nissan makes their cars, specifically the G's. The salesman gave me some horse**** about the added weight has more secure, sturdy feel to it. I said no, my car drives like a two door DeVille!
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #8  
350Zed's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 8
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by SIR NUPE A LOT
The salesman gave me some horse**** about the added weight has more secure, sturdy feel to it.
99% of car salespeople know nothing about what they sell.

Originally Posted by SIR NUPE A LOT
I said no, my car drives like a two door DeVille!
Let's not go that far... I've driven a DeVille, and it's not even close.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #9  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville, nc
Originally Posted by chilibowl
LOL, thats BMW homie...thats BMW...only the Germans think of doing some sh*t like that
you aren't serious, right? you were joking..., right? just clarifying...

(r35)
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 08:36 AM
  #10  
chilibowl's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 21
From: Carteret, NJ
Originally Posted by jasperg35
you aren't serious, right? you were joking..., right? just clarifying...

(r35)
No, I wasnt. How often will a regular joe schmoe 3-Series BMW be taken past 130-140MPH speeds? Not too often sir. A GT-R is an extremely high-performance vehicle that will see those speeds pretty frequently among crazy a$$es taking out joyrides on the highway or even track days. How would you like a tire blow out at those speeds? The 3-Series doesnt need run-flats, they simply did it to increase trunk space to beat out competitors in that area. Go on the Bimmer forums and see how many people complain about those stupid runflats. Were talking a 40K bimmer compared to a 70-90K (Mark-ups) high-performance vehicle.... No, I wasnt kidding.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #11  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville, nc
the r35 comes with run-flats. maybe this implies that nissan is going in that direction?
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #12  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville, nc
ohhh... i get the humor now... sorry, i'm slow today. it's the snow.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
dec55's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by 350Zed
It looks like Nissan is planning on going on a diet instead of continuing the horse-power wars that are running rampant in the marketplace. That's a good thing, because you get both better performance and better economy.

Imagine a 330bhp 350Z/G35/G37 that weighs only 3200lbs!

335i-beating performance without the complexity of FI? Sign me up in 2010 when my G35 lease expires!

Source: leftlanenews.com
Nissan has announced an new initiative to reduce its vehicles' weight by an average of 15% — when compared to its 2005 lineup — over the next seven years. The reason for the weight reduction is to improve fuel economy in the face of stricter regulations worldwide.

The Japanese automaker hopes to the shed weight by working with suppliers to provide lighter weight materials and encouraging them to meet new efficiency targets.

Vehicle weight has ballooned over the past few decades, mainly due to required safety equipment.
The target of 15% would mean most vehicles would lose about 500 pounds. Not only would that weight reduction result in increased fuel economy, but would also boost performance — a win-win situation. In quarter-mile drag racing, every 100 pounds lost results in about .1 second gain, meaning the 350Z would be a mid-13 second car.

Lighter parts, means less metal....which becomes a dilema. Will it effect the
saftey of the car on high impact crashes? Not to mention the cost to repair
minor dents on a kevlar or carbon fiber body ? Looks like the engineers have their work cut out for them..:lol

I can guess a reinforced cabin for saftey,
(a roll cage congifuration..maybe.) More plastic,kevlar,and composites.

..lighter electronic gadgets..(No cd player..or dvd nav...or Hard disk for memory.) All will be flash drive based.


...maybe get high temp exotic ceramic parts for the engine? No spare tire....:lol
 

Last edited by dec55; Feb 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #14  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

Yeah, that's old news but good news. All manufacturers are going to be seriously challenged with the CAFE standards that Jspeed refers to.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #15  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville, nc
well, sometimes, hollow metal components can be stronger than their solid counterparts. this combined with cf (not less metal) could make for a stronger and lighter vehicle.

this is how racing impacts our every day lives.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.