Registered User
NjMatteSedan
Registered User
close
- Join DateApr 2009
- LocationElmwood Park. NJ
- Posts:7,985
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(3)
-
Likes:277
-
Liked:98 Times in 82 Posts
^ +1 lol wtf there's no green tint on g35's
Well then you must be blind. The glass on the G35 comes with stock tint. It is very light, something like 97% tint. Here's a discussion about the topic (Nissan uses the same glass):
http://www.nissanclub.com/forums/200...ndow-tint.html
So before you "lol", get your facts straight.
http://www.nissanclub.com/forums/200...ndow-tint.html
So before you "lol", get your facts straight.

Registered User
Texasscout
Registered User
close
- Join DateFeb 2005
- LocationSouth Texas
- Posts:35,605
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(11)
-
Likes:1,583
-
Liked:2,116 Times in 1,768 Posts
Yes it gives almost 100% UV protection as does almost ANY glass. Ever notice that the "transitions" lenses in your glasses don't work very well in the car or through a window? They need UV light to change.
Glass does not block all UV light. here's a discussion on the topic:
http://community.discovery.com/eve/f...8/m/7141956179
I've certainly gotten sunburned after driving long distances (in other cars).
http://community.discovery.com/eve/f...8/m/7141956179
I've certainly gotten sunburned after driving long distances (in other cars).
I agree the stock is not enough for heat protection. My main interest is UV protection for the interior longevity. I am going to get a sports car next year, so the G35 will be out of the garage onto the street. I don't want to pay for tinting, so I'm wondering if the stock tint is sufficient for protecting the interior from UV.
Registered User
Quote:
I don't have a specific percentage of protection, but I would say it probably does not provide much. The interiors in newer cars will withstand quite a bit of exposure to sunlight though.Originally Posted by quorum
I agree the stock is not enough for heat protection. My main interest is UV protection for the interior longevity. I am going to get a sports car next year, so the G35 will be out of the garage onto the street. I don't want to pay for tinting, so I'm wondering if the stock tint is sufficient for protecting the interior from UV.
Why don't you want to pay for tint? Mine cost just over $100 and it looks great.
Registered User
I use 35% all around the car, when parked at direct sunlight I leave a small 1/4" gap on both door windows and the sunroof tilted , sunshade is also on the windshield. Usually the car won't get as hot as it will without all those precautions.
Registered User
Quote:
in that case, i would tint.. i can tell my interior look flawless compared to friends' leather seats w/o tint.. make sure you put those sunshade on the front windshield.. get the fitted ones for like $25 on eBay.. WORTH EVERY PENNY.Originally Posted by quorum
I agree the stock is not enough for heat protection. My main interest is UV protection for the interior longevity. I am going to get a sports car next year, so the G35 will be out of the garage onto the street. I don't want to pay for tinting, so I'm wondering if the stock tint is sufficient for protecting the interior from UV.
Okay, I don't know what I was talking about just now. Yes I will tint, and I intended to. I think what started this topic was my curiosity about the "stock tint" in the car and whether there was any UV protection.
I think premium cars should have 100% UV protection stock, don't you think?
I think premium cars should have 100% UV protection stock, don't you think?
Registered User
yea they should, I mean mercedes does it stock so i thing the G's have some sort of uv already