2006 G35 Stock tint - UV protection?

Subscribe
Mar 30, 2010 | 01:08 AM
  #1  
Does anyone know if that green tint that comes on stock G35s have any UV protection? Thanks!
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 02:50 AM
  #2  
green tint?
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #3  
^ +1 lol wtf there's no green tint on g35's
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #4  
Well then you must be blind. The glass on the G35 comes with stock tint. It is very light, something like 97% tint. Here's a discussion about the topic (Nissan uses the same glass):

http://www.nissanclub.com/forums/200...ndow-tint.html

So before you "lol", get your facts straight.
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #5  
Yes it gives almost 100% UV protection as does almost ANY glass. Ever notice that the "transitions" lenses in your glasses don't work very well in the car or through a window? They need UV light to change.
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #6  
Glass does not block all UV light. here's a discussion on the topic:

http://community.discovery.com/eve/f...8/m/7141956179

I've certainly gotten sunburned after driving long distances (in other cars).
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 02:40 PM
  #7  
not enough.. get aftermarket tint for heat protection..
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #8  
I agree the stock is not enough for heat protection. My main interest is UV protection for the interior longevity. I am going to get a sports car next year, so the G35 will be out of the garage onto the street. I don't want to pay for tinting, so I'm wondering if the stock tint is sufficient for protecting the interior from UV.
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #9  
Quote: I agree the stock is not enough for heat protection. My main interest is UV protection for the interior longevity. I am going to get a sports car next year, so the G35 will be out of the garage onto the street. I don't want to pay for tinting, so I'm wondering if the stock tint is sufficient for protecting the interior from UV.
I don't have a specific percentage of protection, but I would say it probably does not provide much. The interiors in newer cars will withstand quite a bit of exposure to sunlight though.

Why don't you want to pay for tint? Mine cost just over $100 and it looks great.
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #10  
I use 35% all around the car, when parked at direct sunlight I leave a small 1/4" gap on both door windows and the sunroof tilted , sunshade is also on the windshield. Usually the car won't get as hot as it will without all those precautions.
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 03:17 PM
  #11  
Quote: I agree the stock is not enough for heat protection. My main interest is UV protection for the interior longevity. I am going to get a sports car next year, so the G35 will be out of the garage onto the street. I don't want to pay for tinting, so I'm wondering if the stock tint is sufficient for protecting the interior from UV.
in that case, i would tint.. i can tell my interior look flawless compared to friends' leather seats w/o tint.. make sure you put those sunshade on the front windshield.. get the fitted ones for like $25 on eBay.. WORTH EVERY PENNY.
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 03:29 PM
  #12  
yea do tint, I have 5% rears and 20% front
Reply 0
Mar 30, 2010 | 03:37 PM
  #13  
Okay, I don't know what I was talking about just now. Yes I will tint, and I intended to. I think what started this topic was my curiosity about the "stock tint" in the car and whether there was any UV protection.

I think premium cars should have 100% UV protection stock, don't you think?
Reply 0
Mar 31, 2010 | 03:06 AM
  #14  
yea they should, I mean mercedes does it stock so i thing the G's have some sort of uv already
Reply 0
Subscribe