G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

proof: g35 not faster then s2000, chevy truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #1  
cnaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
proof: g35 not faster then s2000, chevy truck


G35 290hp looses on all races... Against a car with only 237hp.
Stock 04 G35 vs S2k with intake and header.

20mph roll - G35 looses
45mph roll - G35 looses
10mph roll - G35 looses
dead stop - G35 looses
65mph roll - Close but no cigar.

So whoever planted a fake story about beating an S2k was lying..

And here an Auto G35 loosing to a chevy truck. LOL.


Moral of the story, G35 is not a fast car, and wasn't ment to be a race car off the lot...
 

Last edited by cnaman; Dec 9, 2006 at 06:39 PM.
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:47 PM
  #2  
mbdizzle's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
First off it wasn't a 'fake' story i planted, why would i make it up?...Secondly i have an 05 6mt, and 3rd off i said it was a good race and had him up to 3rd gear, or along those lines. thanks for the links
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:50 PM
  #3  
ARTofDESIGN's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Near Central CA
Originally Posted by cnaman
....Moral of the story, G35 is not a fast car, and wasn't ment to be a race car off the lot...
IMO, This is a dumb statement.

Fast depends on ones opinion of the word.

Personally, considering all cars, i'd say a stock car running in the 14 second range is worthy of being considered fast.

Again, Fast depends on ones opinion of the word.

Even my FX is fast, when considering what it is and other vehicles in its class....

Originally Posted by cnaman
........and wasn't ment to be a race car off the lot...
And the S2000 was?
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Pointless Thread.

An S2000 vs a G35 6MT is basically a drivers race.

You should stop magazine racing and try taking one on your own (on the drag strip... or, on your own risk, on the street).

I have seen many G35 6MT's take out S2000's and have seen many S2000's take out g35s

.
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #5  
TwiBlue's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
I hate it when people post on forums and act like they are the Sh*t. First off, at 280hp the car or 298hp or whatever amount of HP you have, if you have a g35 your going to be faster than 95% of the c and ars on the road. Therefore, RELATIVLY the car is fast. Yes there will be cars that are cheaper and faster wtih less hp but you can go into any price range and do the same thing and guessss what your going to find something cheaper and faster. Thats like saying.. OMG a c6 corvette can beat a Ferrari f430 0-60 and in the 1/4... Therefore the Ferrari is SLOW and not made to go fast. Post something worth reading next time, you just wasted 3 min of my life
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #6  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Also, the that race on youtube was against a modded S2000.

You need to remember that the S2000 probably only had a driver while the G35 had a driver & passenger.

The S2000 also had very good mods on him...

But then again you should obviously know this since you know so much about cars
.
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #7  
cnaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
yes, the s2k, of the lot was ment to be a fast car... it was made by honda as most effective horepower to liter ratio. Its a high rev engine. the g35 is a car that was ment to look nice and have the big 3.5 liter to back it up... but cmon man... seriously,,, our cars is not a fast car... i know cause i have one.. haha.

but yeah, i didn't buy this car because it was "fast".. mostly cause it looked pretty damn sweet.
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #8  
ARTofDESIGN's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Near Central CA
Originally Posted by cnaman
yes, the s2k, of the lot was ment to be a fast car...
Fast yes, RACE car(as previously said by you) no.
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #9  
Jee_35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 2
From: Ellicott City, MD
man that was a modded s2k. You have no idea how responsive s2k's are to a nice set of headers and an intake. Most people with Intake/header/exhaust combo in s2k's can run at least high 13's. My s2k had intake/exhaust/headers + stickies and I ran a good 13.5x in the 1/4. Stock for stock its a drivers race. I love the s2k, and wish to own one again, the g35 is a great car, nice mix of performance/style/price. but... you're entitled to your opinion nice vid btw
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #10  
JDM 350GT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,100
Likes: 0
pretty obvious no?
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 07:00 PM
  #11  
cnaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
G35 has 293hp...

S2k has 237hp.....

Ur saying intake and exhaust give the S2k well over 50whp? hahahahah.. Dumb azz... Intake and exhaust will yeild no more then 15hpmax...
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 07:03 PM
  #12  
ARTofDESIGN's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Near Central CA
For the record you said RACE car:

Originally Posted by cnaman
....Moral of the story, G35 is not a fast car, and wasn't ment to be a race car off the lot...
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #13  
cnaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ARTofDESIGN
For the record you said RACE car:
same difference... and for the record, our cars aren't fast off the lot... vids shows it lost to a s2k, and a TRUCK.. haha.

but it does look good. thats why i bought one... but hell no it ain't fast... can't wait to see more stories how someone who just bought a 5speed auto g35 went againt a porche and smoked it by 10 car length.
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #14  
TwiBlue's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cnaman
G35 has 293hp...

S2k has 237hp.....

Ur saying intake and exhaust give the S2k well over 50whp? hahahahah.. Dumb azz... Intake and exhaust will yeild no more then 15hpmax...

Dude please quit the forums. the s2000 weighs ALOT less than the g35. No one said that intake and exhaust will yeild 50whp, he just said that it would be responsive. Please get your facts straight and stop assuming
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #15  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by cnaman
G35 has 293hp...

S2k has 237hp.....

Ur saying intake and exhaust give the S2k well over 50whp? hahahahah.. Dumb azz... Intake and exhaust will yeild no more then 15hpmax...
Ok at first I was trying to be nice... but now you just a moron dude seriously.

An S2000, like a G35 6MT, is a very low 14 second car.

Adding an Intake and Headers can make it get into the 13's easily.

If you're going to post stupid threads like this, atleast know what your talking about.

To me, you sound like a "G35 driver" who wanted and expected M3 performance out of it... but found out otherwise.

Go research both the S2000 and G35 because you obviously havent.

Saying that a 2.2 Liter engine is meant to be fast while a 3.5 liter engine is only meant for show off shows how ignorant and stupid you are.

.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM.