Any opinions on Suntek ceramic tint?
Like the title says, I'm looking for advice on Suntek ceramic tint. I'd appreciate it if anyone has praises or horror stories about this product. I was quoted for $189 while another shop wanted $399 for ceramic. So I'm left confused on why the price discrepancy is so large. Any information is appreciated. Thanks.
Last edited by boknows; Feb 11, 2007 at 10:30 PM.
Originally Posted by jdmeg21
whats this ceramic tint. is that the silver reflective tint
Originally Posted by duggy
Some people consider ceramic tint to be used in Navigation cars because they say that the metallic tint throws off the navi.
I think it's a marketing scheme.
I think it's a marketing scheme.
I finally decided to get the Huper Optik ceramic tint for $399. I figure there's no way my black leather will last in this Texas heat unless I get it.
Trending Topics
I have Suntek Metallic tint. The owner of the shop was cool, and we chatted for a long while, since I was the last customer, and I was inquiring about residential tint as well. But anways, I remember him saying the the metallic tint still had very good infrared blocking. It was over 90%, but I can't remember the exact number.
The $189 quote is definately for the metallic, not the ceramic. The ceramic is much more.
Unless you have some need to go ceramic or you have the cash to burn, I don't see the point. I've run metallic tints in all my cars, and some of them have been running them for close to 10 years now, and they are still going strong. And the Navi and AM radio works fine in all my cars, despite the tint.
Even the shop owner told me that there was really no need for me to go ceramic. But, of course, YMMV.
My black leather did just fine in the 117 degree heat last summer. Personally, I think most of the heat enters your car through the front windshield.... I think you'll get better results by using a reflective sunshade on the windshield, then going ceramic on your other windows. But hey, I'm not here to tell you what to do, I'm just stating my opinion.
The $189 quote is definately for the metallic, not the ceramic. The ceramic is much more.
Unless you have some need to go ceramic or you have the cash to burn, I don't see the point. I've run metallic tints in all my cars, and some of them have been running them for close to 10 years now, and they are still going strong. And the Navi and AM radio works fine in all my cars, despite the tint.
Even the shop owner told me that there was really no need for me to go ceramic. But, of course, YMMV.
My black leather did just fine in the 117 degree heat last summer. Personally, I think most of the heat enters your car through the front windshield.... I think you'll get better results by using a reflective sunshade on the windshield, then going ceramic on your other windows. But hey, I'm not here to tell you what to do, I'm just stating my opinion.
Last edited by avs007; Feb 6, 2007 at 08:46 PM.
Originally Posted by avs007
But anways, I remember him saying the the metallic tint still had very good infrared blocking. It was over 90%, but I can't remember the exact number.
Ceramic blocks more heat with a lighter visible tint. Essentially that's the difference.
If you want that really dark look, you probably will not like it as much, but it works great to keep the interior cool.
If you want that really dark look, you probably will not like it as much, but it works great to keep the interior cool.
Update on my tint plus question
So here are some pics of my tint, but looking at the last picture, you can tell there are air bubbles. There are also tons of air bubbles on the side windows. The tinter is a reputable one and says that it takes 4-7 weeks for the bubbles to work themselves out. They also said since this is ceramic tint, it is a thick tint which means bubbles are expected. I'm thinking about waiting 4-5 weeks and see if the bubbles go away, just wondering if any of you can verify this is how new tint is suppose to look like. Thanks!




Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





