Is there really that big of a difference between MT & AT!?
Your exactly right but the a/t has about 10 more ftpn of trq. 270 versus 260 for m/t. Torque is what get's you going at 4200 rpms and then the hp kicks in at around 5400 rpms. That's why theses cars are so close in performance. The a/t should have an edge on take off and the m/t cathing up on the top winning by about 2 tenths of a second..
Bullsheit. Any REAL SPORTS CAR, required you to hand crank it to start and adjust the ignition advance and a/f ratio on the fly. All while changing gears on a tranny with no syncromesh. Oh disc brakes? What kind of pu$$y used those? Drum brakes or nutin' man.
Power steering is for bitches.
Your exactly right but the a/t has about 10 more ftpn of trq. 270 versus 260 for m/t. Torque is what get's you going at 4200 rpms and then the hp kicks in at around 5400 rpms. That's why theses cars are so close in performance. The a/t should have an edge on take off and the m/t cathing up on the top winning by about 2 tenths of a second..
You forgot though:
HR + 6MT + Ridiculous vibes / burnt clutch smell X cool a$$ youtube street race video = pure awesomeness at any speed.
That's not even considering the ginormous ***** multiplication factor.
HR + 6MT + Ridiculous vibes / burnt clutch smell X cool a$$ youtube street race video = pure awesomeness at any speed.
That's not even considering the ginormous ***** multiplication factor.




