G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Coefficient of Drag

Old Jul 12, 2005 | 11:48 PM
  #1  
Derzigster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Question Coefficient of Drag

I am surprized at the drag numbers for the sedan vs the coupe. The coupe is rated at .28 with the Aero Package (.29 without). The sedan is rated a mere 0.26 with the Aero Package (0.27 without). How can the sedan have less drag then the coupe? I guess looks can be deceiving because although the sedan looks sweet the coupe looks much slipperier and sleeker to my untrained eye.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 12:01 AM
  #3  
Finiti35's Avatar
FGC South Florida BOD
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,691
Likes: 1
You'll be surprised. A huge grandpa car like the Lexus LS430 also has a coef of drag of .26, while a c5 Vette has a Cd of .29. A low Cd doesn't necessarily require a sleek design. It depends on many factors among which the shape of the front and rear end, underbody, and wheel wells.

.02 is a whole lot at 150mph
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 12:45 AM
  #5  
Andy2434's Avatar
Super Moderator
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,717
Likes: 3
From: S.F. Bay Area
LOL . . . At speeds of 150mph, you might need more than simply an additional .02 drag coeficient . . . A Prayer?
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 01:02 AM
  #6  
Armani350GT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Smaller *** makes lower CDs. That's why Lexus LS has low CDs ( I thought it was 0.25, somewhere around there) If you see it, the back is more narrow and compact compared to the front, which makes it look kinda nappy but glides through wind smoother. Just like an airplane.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 01:14 AM
  #7  
Finiti35's Avatar
FGC South Florida BOD
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,691
Likes: 1
Yeah, the teardrop shape. Btw yeah I think it's .25 with the Euro suspension or whatever that package is called. I know that car majorly upset the vette circles when it came out.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 01:24 AM
  #8  
derek's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Metropolitan South Farmington, not too far from the supercity we all know as Wilmot, NS
Low Cd helps mileage and noise, but you won't find any Ferraris looking for low Cds. Aero balance is key- downforce for drag. Can I reduce Cd while still achieving suitable downforce for the car's intended purpose. A good example of this actually comes from, ironically, a car descended from another that was once known for it's aero flaws- the Ford GT. It has a relatively poor Cd- well into the point threes- but generates great downforce, Of course the design team was hampered with trying to achieve something similar to it's predecessor in appearance. They did fix the "air under the nose" problem that plagued the original GT40. An example of better aero balance- the new F430- tons of downforce by relatively slippery car.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #10  
csdstudio's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: MN, western subs
Large *** it is. And I like it too.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #11  
whyjay91's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
Baby got back.... so delicious.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AJC128
New Members Check In
1
Nov 1, 2015 11:55 AM
6spdGspot
Wheels & Tires
6
Oct 5, 2015 01:55 PM
dcsbh1
Brakes & Suspension
0
Oct 1, 2015 03:15 PM
twentyeggs
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
8
Sep 11, 2015 03:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.