$35k sedans comparo from C&D (from E60 board)
#16
#17
#18
Car and Driver is STUPID who the hell believes that crap. There is no way it does 0 to 60 in 5.1. If it is true it still doesnt matter becuz our cars are 10 times nicer and hav much more curb appeal than the steril looking IS. I would take my 05 ivory pearl coupe any day over any of those cars exterior wise
#20
Originally Posted by B GrAzi
Car and Driver is STUPID who the hell believes that crap. There is no way it does 0 to 60 in 5.1. If it is true it still doesnt matter becuz our cars are 10 times nicer and hav much more curb appeal than the steril looking IS. I would take my 05 ivory pearl coupe any day over any of those cars exterior wise
#21
Did you guys like ignore my post or something? Lexus' own site says 0-60 in 5.6.
The Car and Driver website says 0-62.. not 60, 62 in 5.9 sec.
The car is 310 hp, 266 tq. I don't know the weight, but I'm sure it's over 3500 pounds. It might be possible.. but personally I think 5.1 qt mile 13.7 is ambitious. 5.6 sounds more realistic.
The Car and Driver website says 0-62.. not 60, 62 in 5.9 sec.
The car is 310 hp, 266 tq. I don't know the weight, but I'm sure it's over 3500 pounds. It might be possible.. but personally I think 5.1 qt mile 13.7 is ambitious. 5.6 sounds more realistic.
#22
Originally Posted by ghost30
Did you guys like ignore my post or something? Lexus' own site says 0-60 in 5.6.
The Car and Driver website says 0-62.. not 60, 62 in 5.9 sec.
The car is 310 hp, 266 tq. I don't know the weight, but I'm sure it's over 3500 pounds. It might be possible.. but personally I think 5.1 qt mile 13.7 is ambitious. 5.6 sounds more realistic.
The Car and Driver website says 0-62.. not 60, 62 in 5.9 sec.
The car is 310 hp, 266 tq. I don't know the weight, but I'm sure it's over 3500 pounds. It might be possible.. but personally I think 5.1 qt mile 13.7 is ambitious. 5.6 sounds more realistic.
#23
#24
The order they are placed in is regarding how much advertising budget they alloted to the magazine. Their rankings mean NOTHING and usually their tests are so far bogus that they are worthless to even recognize.
Why do you think the 'Vette is the new namesake of Car and Driver Television?
Why do you think the 'Vette is the new namesake of Car and Driver Television?
#25
#27
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
5.1 to 60 is crazy. I think the IS did better than the GTO. I have no problem giving credit where it's due, but taking the IS' horsepower,torque and weight in consideration, those times are a little shaky. Didn't C&D get 5.6 for the G35 Coupe at one time?
#28
#29
Originally Posted by UofMG35
C&D got 0-60 in 5.5 seconds for the 2003 G35 Coupe 6MT. I have trouble believing that the IS350 is that fast, especially with an AT. However, if it is, then Infiniti has some catch-up to play with the next-gen G35.