G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

AT or 6MT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-20-2003 | 10:01 PM
dgussin1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Ca
AT or 6MT

I have always been under the impression that Manual transmissions are faster then automatic trannys. I have heard rumors that the g35 AT is faster than 6MT, is this true? If so I must rethink the Manual.

Life is to short to argue on the Internet!

04' 6MT Coupe (on order)
 
  #2  
Old 08-20-2003 | 10:07 PM
FDNameBrands's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Re: AT or 6MT

Manuals are usually faster given that they have a skilled driver at the wheel. The fastest I’ve seen for the G35C 6MT was like 5.5s to 60 and 14.2 in the ¼ mile, and for the AT it’s like 6s to 60 and 14.6 in the ¼ mile.

 
  #3  
Old 08-20-2003 | 10:15 PM
uheenada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: AT or 6MT

usually for g35 manual tranny will be about .2-.3sec faster than AT tranny... I have seen 14flat for manual and 14.2 for AT but usually manual will be around 14.2-3 and 14.2-5 for AT... again due to same specs(same hp,tq about same weight), manual driver must be decent in order to beat AT g35 cuz AT g35 are pretty quick too.. but again i'm not saying AT is faster than MT... If you want .2 faster car with MT or .2 sec slower AT is up to you... it's just me i won't get manual for .2-3 advantage over AT.. just too much work for me and i would never sacrifice relaxing driving with AT for 2-3 carlength difference...plus i have so many friends that they r tired of MT but i would get manual if MT is fast by .6-7 sec than AT... just my opinion don't flame at me...

<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small"><EM>Edited by uheenada on 08/20/03 07:19 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
  #5  
Old 08-20-2003 | 11:14 PM
uheenada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: AT or 6MT

first i don't want 6MT + brembo brakes are sure great but stock brembo isn't that impressive and much expensive to replace + 6MT suspension isn't that much better than AT... i bet most ppl won't feel that much difference... plus you can buy springs for few hundreds... and once again it's just me who don't sacrifice AT to get faster by few tenths of sec plus not impressive brembo plus little more tigher suspension(i'm perfectly satisfied with current suspention set up on my AT) so y so nononono to AT???

<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small"><EM>Edited by uheenada on 08/20/03 08:16 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
  #7  
Old 08-20-2003 | 11:22 PM
uheenada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: AT or 6MT

actually i never heard either but since he said tighter suspension for 6MT and i'm assuming it won't make that much difference...

 
  #9  
Old 08-20-2003 | 11:34 PM
G35Gnome's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey, Hudson County
Re: AT or 6MT

Yea i never heard that also, i think its only the brembos that are different. and with the 500 difference in price or whatever it is, you can get the ecu upgrade and be equal or faster the 6MT for same price that is. But then 6MT has better moding capablilities.

 
  #10  
Old 08-20-2003 | 11:48 PM
uheenada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: AT or 6MT

there are small population of die hard manual drivers out there... i saw somewhere that 99% of automobile sales in US is AT... if you give AT ppl 2 reasons why drive autos than i have one question to ask to all manual driver... why can't you guys get along with new technolgy... i mean auto makers not using 1980s technology on AT tranny... there is no reason to drive MT now days... if you want to drive manual that's fine i give fully respect who drives MT and i think i deserve a good respect too...oh BTW you might think drive is advanture but 99% of ppl on the road think drive is nothing but a transportation...

 
  #12  
Old 08-21-2003 | 12:09 AM
uheenada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: AT or 6MT

for those ppl who got MT just admit that you can't get along with new technology... so you think manual transmission is better than SMG or AMG?? SMG is still manual but since it's acting as AT so i'll call auto here... if manual is sooooooooo great then y in F1 race or rally use the almighty SMG or AMG??? they are doing true race at no limits and with few other cars but why they r not using manual???

 
  #15  
Old 08-21-2003 | 12:26 AM
uheenada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: AT or 6MT

umm... if you have eyes than you can clearly can read that i said SMG is manual but since computer is doing clutch for you i stated that auto in here... read it properly.. gosh
and BTW where you get the troubles with SMG from?? from my experience driving M3(my friends) i don't have any trouble with SMG at all that u mentioned... and i think SMG is great... oh have you ever drive SMG m3 b4?? oh yeah you probably gonna answer yes cuz if u don't it will only make you fool...

<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small"><EM>Edited by uheenada on 08/20/03 09:29 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: AT or 6MT



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.