damn 350z
#47
05-02-2006, 08:59 PM
#48
05-02-2006, 09:15 PM
found this saying its coming in 09 if not in 08 and it will be a Nissan Skyline GT-R and not Infiniti.
http://www.caranddriver.com/carnews/...line-gt-r.html
Googled, and many articles have basically the same info. Most claim 08 is the year, a couple said 07 (well kept secret if so) and a few say 09.
http://www.caranddriver.com/carnews/...line-gt-r.html
Googled, and many articles have basically the same info. Most claim 08 is the year, a couple said 07 (well kept secret if so) and a few say 09.
#49
05-02-2006, 10:44 PM
Originally Posted by SDG
You dont know me or my car and thats insulting. I took stuff I read and compared to my car and it matches.
Originally Posted by SDG
Your detailed technical explanation turned to 'ruff estimates' pretty quickly, besides 4500 is not roughly 3800.
Originally Posted by SDG
Road and Track, Car and Driver etc. They live by their reputation. Tests conducted with professional drivers and measuring equipment. The cars are inspected before and after. They are so certain that they publish their data for national ridicule if incorrect. Somehow this data is supposed to be less convincing than your questionable story at the track? I don't think so. Especially when anyone here with actual times/data posted anything it mostly all jives. No way that an auto gets redone from intake to exhaust and 'some other engine mods' and it still gets worked over by the stock manual. You want to talk about how you can kick our a$$ through the windy roads with your stick shift I can get on board with that, but this track story ...stinks!
#50
05-02-2006, 11:28 PM
Originally Posted by aleok
sorry to cut in, but hes in Northern Cali and i'm in Hawaii... i know it doens't really matter but i just wanna know whos car is faster.
Has anyone answered my question about an AT with the 3.5 final drive? I'm curious to know what others would say if the AT had a 3.5 final drive to match the speed of the MT.
#51
05-03-2006, 02:58 PM
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
I didnt mean to insult anyone or any car in any way. We all drive the same car. I was just stating the facts.
U obiviously don't know much about cars. Take is as u want.
#53
05-03-2006, 05:54 PM
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
I commute in congested freeways all the time and i enjoy pressing the clutch 10000000 times and never get tired of it. 
As far as 5AT has similar accelaration as 6MT i hate to say it is not true
. Only similarity that they have in acceration is 1st and 2nd gear.One day race a 6MT on highway from 60-100 u will know what i am talking about. 
As far as 5AT has similar accelaration as 6MT i hate to say it is not true
. Only similarity that they have in acceration is 1st and 2nd gear.One day race a 6MT on highway from 60-100 u will know what i am talking about. I sit on the 10 and 405 freeways everyday and I still never considered an AT. Driving a 6MT is so much more fun!!
#55
05-03-2006, 10:14 PM
.
#59
05-04-2006, 01:29 PM
#60
05-10-2006, 02:02 AM
what kind of noob tries to race an automatic anyways, even if it is faster? But hey, at least its not an automatic corvette..those owners should be castrated...
Not a slam on you SDG, just speaking in general terms so don't take it as a hit to your car or your ego..there are obvious reasons why auto works better for some...unless it's a corvette
Not a slam on you SDG, just speaking in general terms so don't take it as a hit to your car or your ego..there are obvious reasons why auto works better for some...unless it's a corvette
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
THMotorsports
Suspension-Vendor
257
12-18-2018 05:43 PM
VatoVazq
Steering & Suspension
15
12-23-2015 10:01 AM
