Quick 5AT question about tiptronic???
Interesting. Didn't know that. I had a new F150 5.4 with the 6AT a few weeks back and drove it for 5 days and 1500 miles. While the exterior/interior styling has remained largely unchanged, Ford did thier homework on the seats and driving dynamics of the truck. It's by far the best driving truck I've had, Titans coming in a close second. That 6AT does wonders for performance. It's geared well and is responsive. Neither could have been said for the prior gen truck. The seats are a HUGE improvement. Gone are the wide and unsupportive fat American seats and in are nicely bolstered and fairly narrow seats. Steering is the best I've felt in a truck. All it's missing is that new 6 liter motor or the Ecoboost TT6 both of which should be in the truck in a year.
I too agree that VB don't really change the speed at which transmission shifts based on my own experience. GTM installed my VB (a transgo kit) on my 04 sedan during my supercharger installation. I don't feel it shift any faster or slower (about the same), perhaps just firmer shift.
Right now, the rumors are that the F-150 and the Mustang are going to get the 5.0L modular V8 with 400HP/400TQ for 2011....as a base model engine. The 6.2L could be a higher engine..who knows.
The Ecoboost TTV6 should be available late 2010 model year on the F150...same engine as the SHO and the MKS. The Mustang won't get Ecoboost though...which is stupid IMHO they are losing out on a whole market with a turbo stang. The rumored engine is their new 3.7L making 315HP N/A
Maybe different cars respond a little bit differently to VB. I thought VB is mainly used to prevent transmission slip (thus heat) when you go FI. Regardless, I think Gs (including G37s I had test driven) have one of the least responsive automatic transmission compared to, say, a 335 or A4. Just my two cents. I want to learn how I can improve my transmission's responsiveness too. What's the purpose of a bigger stall if someone can shed some light?
More torque multiplication (ie hard launch). A torque converter works like this. Visualize to fans facing each other. Turn one fan on and the other will start to spin. In theory, the fan that is off should come up to the same speed as the fan that is on. The stall speed is basically the speed at which the fan that's not on has matched the speed the turned on fan. This is basically how a torque converter works. Instead of air, it's fluid. Instead of fans, the coupling device between the spinning flywheel and the transmission. The higher stall speed means more rpm before the TC is fully engaged. It's basically like driving a manual and launching at a higher rpm. However, the initial torque multiplication of the converter is FAR greater than what you'll get out of a manual. We're 50% more torque multiplication. However, this initial hit in launch is not sustained very long (about 1 second or so). Add a higher stall TC and you could be looking at an additional 80% increase.
The downside to the higher stall TC is increased slippage and lagginess during most driving because the TC will be below the stall speed. This also increases tranny temp. The G already comes with a relatively high stall TC (~2800rpms full stall) however the tires will tend to break loose at 2400-2500rpms.
The downside to the higher stall TC is increased slippage and lagginess during most driving because the TC will be below the stall speed. This also increases tranny temp. The G already comes with a relatively high stall TC (~2800rpms full stall) however the tires will tend to break loose at 2400-2500rpms.
The downside to the higher stall TC is increased slippage and lagginess during most driving because the TC will be below the stall speed. This also increases tranny temp. The G already comes with a relatively high stall TC (~2800rpms full stall) however the tires will tend to break loose at 2400-2500rpms.
Funny you say this cause I find the stall on the G35 too low for the engine. One of my Grand Prix's ( the N/A one ) had a ~3000rpm stall and it made gobs more torque than a VQ at low rpms yet was very streetable ( and obviously launched much much harder ). I think a 3000-3200rpm converter would be much better suited for the G considering the weaker low end power and still maintain a somewhat responsive feel. I'm seriously thinking of doing this.
That's sad that the Ecoboost won't find it's way into the Stang because I was hoping we were going to see a "SVO" Stang with a lot of Euro flavor, just like the previous SVO turbo Stang. I guess Ford didn't want V6TT to crush the new 5.0. I'm sure you've heard that there is already new SHO with a tune running 12.8s@109mph. In a 1,000lb lighter car, that would mean the V6TT Stang would be going easy 12.0s@116+. Yikes. Sounds like fun.
I really believe a 500rpm bump in the stall of the G35 would make it a completely different beast off the line.
So yours is an 04 and doesn't downshift at WOT in manumatic. Do you know if it's a first half 04 or a second half? My guess is it's the 04.5.
Anyone got an 04 that DOES downshift under WOT in manumatic?
Anyone got an 04 that DOES downshift under WOT in manumatic?




