G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Injen ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-28-2005, 01:17 AM
05Blk's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Injen ?

hey guys i wanted to know which intake is better? I dont want to hear about the Z Tube unless it is all around better then the injen cai. I am looking for raw performace all around. Price doesnt matter so who has done dynos? injen or aem or Nismo? thanks guys
 
  #2  
Old 04-28-2005, 01:50 AM
Hyde's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just get a Z-Tube. there are more HP gain then any one of those CAI u mention

Nismo CAI is the rebadge Injen, and its only avaliable with Nismo USA, u know why?
cuz Nismo Japan know they suck, but ricer here loves having the air filter down in the bumper.
 
  #3  
Old 04-28-2005, 07:29 AM
RichK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wayne, PA
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you search the site, you will find that the factory intake is a darn good CAI. The only issue is the baffles and resonators in the tube. Getting a Z tube and a K&N drop in seems to be the way to go. I just got a UT polished Z tube and a drop in K&N. Seems to respond better at high RPMs, but the sound at WOT is awesome. I think doing that and adding either a plenum spacer or a new plenum by Crawford or Kinetix would be your best bet if money wasn't an issue.
 
  #4  
Old 04-28-2005, 11:48 AM
soad's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sherman Oaks C.A
Posts: 496
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i got the aem cai on my g but i here that the k&n cai is the one making more hp . but thats just me
 
  #5  
Old 04-28-2005, 01:44 PM
Gsedan35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,288
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 12 Posts
I went from the oem intake to the Injen CAI. At first the wonderfull induction howl was fooling me into thinking it was offering up more power. The reality is, is wasn't. So I pulled it off the car and sold it. Thinking that I could rework a K&N Typhon intake ment for the 350Z. I thought I could do better then the oem instake since the 350Z Typhon has a intake scoupe in the bumber. I ended up having to totally rework the intake to fix a ton of design flaws that K&N doesn't talk about. In the end however, it wasn't any better. Since I'd like to add on brake cooling duct's one of these days and the K&N intake plumbed where I needed the space, I pulled the Z Typhon off the car and I am now running the K&N panel filter with a Z-tube.

Let's not forget, the oem intake is well designed, living no room for the aftermaket to improve apon. This goes for intake temps too. No CAI has ever been able to pull in lower air temps that will amount to a difference in power production, so in fact bring in air that is actualy hotter (PopCharger).
 
  #6  
Old 04-28-2005, 02:31 PM
05Blk's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the Crawford V1 pleneum is best? I am lost guys.
 
  #7  
Old 04-28-2005, 05:31 PM
doogie's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 05Blk
Injen or AEM or Nismo? thanks guys
They're all the same. Choose the one that looks nicer and / or you can get a better deal on. Honestly... they're all pipes with filters on the end... They just look slightly different and vary in price. Personally I have the AEM. I got it because I got a great deal on it. I like it better than stock for sound alone, and for the fact that I don't have to clean the filter as often, and for the fact that I won't have to replace it.
 
  #8  
Old 04-28-2005, 05:33 PM
doogie's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
...And the truth is, NO-ONE has dyno evidence of stock vs CAI vs z tube+K&N on the SAME car, so no-one (that I know of) can make a compelling argument either way. It's a sound mod after all. A difference of 5HP won't make a difference at the track either way. If you want numbers that make a difference, make a plenum mod, add a cat-back system, buy some cams.
 
  #9  
Old 04-28-2005, 06:10 PM
Hyde's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
actually there is
the Injen and AEM CAI actually lost 2HP compare to stock and the Z-Tube + popcharger gained 7RWHP
 
  #10  
Old 04-29-2005, 01:56 AM
doogie's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
So where's the dyno, on the same car?
 
  #11  
Old 04-29-2005, 04:00 AM
skeleton_cru's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Bay, Cali
Posts: 17,096
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Sedan
Originally Posted by 05Blk
So the Crawford V1 pleneum is best? I am lost guys.
As was mentioned before, the stock intake is hard to improve on. As far as "raw performance" goes, look elsewhere. An intake mod will give you negligable gains at best. I had the Injen CAI and switched to the Z-tube/K&N filter. The Injen sounded better, but neither one has increased HP significantly.

Don't confuse CAI's with plenums, they are two completely different parts.
 
  #12  
Old 04-29-2005, 04:58 AM
Hyde's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by doogie
So where's the dyno, on the same car?
do a search on my350z.com

its probably so old that u cant even find it
 
  #13  
Old 04-29-2005, 10:46 AM
doogie's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Hyde
actually there is
the Injen and AEM CAI actually lost 2HP compare to stock and the Z-Tube + popcharger gained 7RWHP
Hmmm

maybe you were referring to this:



On a 350Z, stock peak was 227, AEM peak was 228, and Injen peak was 235.

Not quite losses as you claim but the Injen was the best with a 7HP gain over stock. Again... 7HP isn't really gonna make a huge amount of difference and would probably be undetectable by most people... but there it is.

And of course these numbers are from a 350Z where the "stock" intake is much better than ours to start with - read: Z tube and no big resonators.

So.. as I said... get the one that looks prettier. Not even sure if the Injen CAI for the Z and the G are the same or not. If you want numbers slap on some cams.
 
  #14  
Old 04-29-2005, 11:14 AM
osuredcobra's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by skeleton_cru
As was mentioned before, the stock intake is hard to improve on. As far as "raw performance" goes, look elsewhere. An intake mod will give you negligable gains at best. I had the Injen CAI and switched to the Z-tube/K&N filter. The Injen sounded better, but neither one has increased HP significantly.

Don't confuse CAI's with plenums, they are two completely different parts.


Excellent, this is what I am talking about. Insightful information that saved me time and money. I was going to order the Injen CAI, but after reading this no thanks. Thanks for the great info.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StreetStandard
Exhaust-Vendor
11
01-12-2016 03:21 PM
ncg35guy
New Members Check In
3
09-26-2015 04:04 PM
dorkstar
Engine - Exhaust
3
09-09-2015 07:43 PM
Tukeeg35
Engine - Intake/Fuel
7
08-21-2015 04:19 PM
Racova
2nd Gen (V36) Sedan
2
08-08-2015 10:21 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Injen ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 AM.