Driving hard vs Babying your G
Originally Posted by gtbigup01
I drive my car hard but not over redline. Well yesterday I didn't even notice when it happened but I was enjoying an on-ramp acceleration that when I finally looked up I was at 7400 RPM's. I wasn't happy about that, but on the other habd nothing strange happened. I thought it was supposed to cut engine power when you get into redline. I guess not.
The thing I don’t understand is even if you could get to 7400 rmp, how the hell do you not notice until you “finally looked up”??? The engine would be screaming by then! I have TS ECU re-flash and I rarely (if ever) go to 6500. Even on a dyno at 6500 it’s apparent (by sound) that it’s pushing hard. How do you get into those rmps by accident? I think you miss-read your tach.
Originally Posted by OCG35
A stock G won't rev that high - it has a rev limiter set at 6600... Even re-flashed ECU (at least Technosquare), it will only go to 7100 rmp. Are you sure you didn't miss-read your tach? If not you have an anomaly!
The thing I don’t understand is even if you could get to 7400 rmp, how the hell do you not notice until you “finally looked up”??? The engine would be screaming by then! I have TS ECU re-flash and I rarely (if ever) go to 6500. Even on a dyno at 6500 it’s apparent (by sound) that it’s pushing hard. How do you get into those rmps by accident? I think you miss-read your tach.
The thing I don’t understand is even if you could get to 7400 rmp, how the hell do you not notice until you “finally looked up”??? The engine would be screaming by then! I have TS ECU re-flash and I rarely (if ever) go to 6500. Even on a dyno at 6500 it’s apparent (by sound) that it’s pushing hard. How do you get into those rmps by accident? I think you miss-read your tach.
Originally Posted by EZZ
He has the "old" model G35 which has a very low rev limit of 6600 

Until this discussion I was unaware that ’05 was any different. I felt compelled to find out so called a reliable source - low and behold ’05 MT is higher, but not to 7400. So the question still remains: the original post of 7400 rmp – was this an anomaly or a possibility? (BTW, we don’t know whether his car was MT or AT or what year).
None of it really matters, I’m just perplexed that the car would rev that high, and how you wouldn’t notice far before it did (if it could).
Originally Posted by OCG35
I have the same model year as you... but my limiter is 7100 (only due to ECU tweak).
Until this discussion I was unaware that ’05 was any different. I felt compelled to find out so called a reliable source - low and behold ’05 MT is higher, but not to 7400. So the question still remains: the original post of 7400 rmp – was this an anomaly or a possibility? (BTW, we don’t know whether his car was MT or AT or what year).
None of it really matters, I’m just perplexed that the car would rev that high, and how you wouldn’t notice far before it did (if it could).
Until this discussion I was unaware that ’05 was any different. I felt compelled to find out so called a reliable source - low and behold ’05 MT is higher, but not to 7400. So the question still remains: the original post of 7400 rmp – was this an anomaly or a possibility? (BTW, we don’t know whether his car was MT or AT or what year).
None of it really matters, I’m just perplexed that the car would rev that high, and how you wouldn’t notice far before it did (if it could).
Originally Posted by OCG35
I have the same model year as you... but my limiter is 7100 (only due to ECU tweak).
Until this discussion I was unaware that ’05 was any different. I felt compelled to find out so called a reliable source - low and behold ’05 MT is higher, but not to 7400. So the question still remains: the original post of 7400 rmp – was this an anomaly or a possibility? (BTW, we don’t know whether his car was MT or AT or what year).
None of it really matters, I’m just perplexed that the car would rev that high, and how you wouldn’t notice far before it did (if it could).
Until this discussion I was unaware that ’05 was any different. I felt compelled to find out so called a reliable source - low and behold ’05 MT is higher, but not to 7400. So the question still remains: the original post of 7400 rmp – was this an anomaly or a possibility? (BTW, we don’t know whether his car was MT or AT or what year).
None of it really matters, I’m just perplexed that the car would rev that high, and how you wouldn’t notice far before it did (if it could).
Originally Posted by G35pm
do not keep it there.
Originally Posted by harley01
So I remember reading an article in a magazine that said driving your car hard had little or no affect on engine life. They compared reving an engine to opening a door....it really doesn't matter if you open a door a little or all the way since the door stop will keep you from causing damage to the door. They said an engine is built the same way and the cutoff will keep you from hurting anything. It said you could take your engine into the high RPMs for every shift and it would last well over 100K miles. Any opinions here on this theory?
Originally Posted by telegramsam
Absolute nonsense. The life of the engine, transmission, rear end, u-joints, brakes and suspension are all related to how hard you drive the car. I you plan to keep it a long time it is smart to treat the car well. Drive it hard and it won't last as long, it will have more problems and it will show signs of abuse. Whats important is whether or not you care. If money is no object and you want to drive it to its full potential, go for it. But don't kid yourself, driving the snot out of a car is not good for it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mainevent
New Members Check In
5
Aug 6, 2015 02:30 PM





