G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

New competition for G35: 2006 Passat 3.6L 4Motion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #31  
jasonsfa98's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Thumbs down

I don't think it looks sporty at all ...

 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 11:30 AM
  #32  
4DOORFUN's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TBone24
This'll be a good entry into the market. Passat has been stale for a long, long time. VW has always been the cheap & fun way into the german logos, but suddenly VWs aren't so cheap anymore. Great interiors and great road feel when it's running. I've got a feeling a VR6 with 4Motion will be much closer to 40K than 33K though.

When it's time to get a more cushy freeway cruising automatic, I'd probably look at the new passat, and I'd consider it a competitor to the Avalon and Maxima before the G35
From www.edmunds.com:

Base Invoice Pricing 2006 Passat 4Motion - $29,413
Sport Package - $3050
Bi-xenon swivel headlamps - $950
18" wheel/tire package - $400

Total Invoice- $33,813

There you go. You have a comparable vehicle to the G35X with the same options. The Passat comes standard with AM/FM in-dash 6 CD player, CD-controller with MP3 stereo.

Infiniti hasn't released 2006 invoice pricing yet, but I'll bet it is a bit higher than the 2005 pricing.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 11:34 AM
  #33  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by thetruthkc
Current car is a 98 VW Passat. It was a great car while it lasted. However, I'd like my cars to last beyond 5 years (the term I've owned it). In the last year I've had to put over $3000 worth of work into it just to get it to run. Lots of problems, coils, control arms, ELECTRICAL. Then some wear and tear parts, powersteering pump and rack, brakes, tires.
......
Sounds like I made the right move trading mine after 3 yrs.

I hate putting $$ in at the end.
It gets more difficult to get rid of it because you just dropped a grand or two.
You then feel like you need to hang on 'till you get you're money back out.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #34  
4DOORFUN's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
CORRECTION

From www.edmunds.com:

Base Invoice Pricing 2006 Passat 4Motion - $29,413
Sport Package - $2787
Bi-xenon swivel headlamps - $839
18" wheel/tire package - $353

Total Invoice- $33,392

There you go. You have a comparable vehicle to the G35X with the same options. The Passat comes standard with AM/FM in-dash 6 CD player, CD-controller with MP3 stereo.

Infiniti hasn't released 2006 invoice pricing yet, but I'll bet it is a bit higher than the 2005 pricing.

Base Invoice Pricing 2005 G35X - $30,167
Premium Package C - $3016

Total Invoice - $33,183
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #35  
4DOORFUN's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by trebien
And another point - the AWD system on the Passat is front-biased...

From a handling standpoint, this would be a detriment.
And this is a detriment because???? Please explain further.

Haldex is used on the following vehicles - Volvo S60R, Volkswagen R32, and Audi TT.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #36  
t0pher's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Rear-biased AWD is better for power oversteer (with VDC off, that is )
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #37  
SixFive's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 0
From: Philly
When the engine is turned 90 degrees to sit sideways - it's certainly going to have a heavy front. Call it the anti-mid ship platform. Not worth 40K for sure but that interior is sweet. My old lemmoned 01.5 passat was a very nice ride for the money, the electrical gremlins notwithstanding. The finish and engineering of the interior are awesome. But at mid 30's pricing, why get a FWD based car with possible reliability issues. It looks better than anything american for the $ but still unappealling. VW wants to go upmarket but people bought the people's car for the value and low cost compared to other similar class cars. Say goodbye to hollywood VW. You better have that loyal following still. Paying 40k for family sedans is not going to last long.

I was over at edmunds and some putz was suggesting that "the passat is another design the japanese can copy because that's all they are good at is copying design." Right, the G and the IS look just like german cars - NOT. It could be said that the passat looks like the corolla as some have pointed out for the Jetta.

Anyone know if this car is based on the a-6? It is NOT based on the a-4 any longer. Perhaps it's got it's own platform?
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 03:53 PM
  #38  
Picus's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: Toronto, ON
That pretty much says it. The interiors on all of my VWs have been consistently good - the GTI VR6 was particularly nice, but I was able to put less than 300 miles on that car in a year because it spent, literally, 75% of its life in the shop. It's a shame too, I really like VW/Audi hatchbacks.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #39  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by 4DOORFUN
And this is a detriment because???? Please explain further.

Haldex is used on the following vehicles - Volvo S60R, Volkswagen R32, and Audi TT.
But the ATTESSA is used on the Skyline GTR. GTR > the above cars
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #40  
t0pher's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SixFive
Anyone know if this car is based on the a-6? It is NOT based on the a-4 any longer. Perhaps it's got it's own platform?
Wanna hear something funny? It is based on the Golf platform...

Seriously!
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 05:42 PM
  #41  
DP03's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake Bay, MD.
Before you guys laugh too much, there is an article on the net of a magazine driver ( not one of the big three) that drove this car ***** to the wall in Germany and LOVED it. He expected it to top the BMW competition.

My guess is that once the big mags run it through its paces when it comes out, we may be bumped down one on the list.......(cause reliability can't be measured new).
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #42  
Picus's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: Toronto, ON
You might be right, but given the fact that the TL can't beat the G in comparative tests almost soley because it's a FWD car, I have the distinct feeling the same may apply to the new Passat. This is a lot like the whole G vs IS350 thing - ya, the IS350 is faster and beat the G in the latest C&D, but it isn't nearly as sporty, and I don't think the Passat will be either, and unlike the IS350 it doesn't have 300hp/torque and won't be pulling 5.1s in the 0-60.

Just my thoughts.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #43  
doogie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 3
From: Denton, TX
Originally Posted by SixFive
When the engine is turned 90 degrees to sit sideways - it's certainly going to have a heavy front. Call it the anti-mid ship platform.
The VR6 is much smaller than a traditional V6; in the right hands it'd make a VERY compelling engine to put in a RWD car with a longitudinal setup. The beauty of the VR-platform is that you can take (conceptually) two of 'em and slap them together in a traditional V, thus creating the "W12" engine (this is what they do with the W8, two VR4s slapped together. A V8 in a much smaller space than is traditionally used:



Man, It makes me all hot n' bothered talking about the VR6. More info here
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #44  
DP03's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake Bay, MD.
Originally Posted by picus112
You might be right, but given the fact that the TL can't beat the G in comparative tests almost soley because it's a FWD car, I have the distinct feeling the same may apply to the new Passat. This is a lot like the whole G vs IS350 thing - ya, the IS350 is faster and beat the G in the latest C&D, but it isn't nearly as sporty, and I don't think the Passat will be either, and unlike the IS350 it doesn't have 300hp/torque and won't be pulling 5.1s in the 0-60.

Just my thoughts.
I agree with the FWD vs RWD thing. I MUCH prefer a RWD (or RWD bias, in my case) car. I think the Lexus is probably a great car. I wanted AWD, so that ruled out the IS350 for me. My S60R was 100% FWD biased, and I much prefer the G35's RWD.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 08:24 PM
  #45  
Picus's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: Toronto, ON
I drove the Lexus and posted my thoughts in another thread. It's a nice car, awesome interior and the fit and finish is leaps and bounds above the G35, it's fast too, and you can really feel the torque - but in typical Lexus fashion the handling is far too artificial feeling, there is no feedback at all, too much body roll, too much understeer, you get the idea. I am interested to see how the Passat feels on the road, initial reports are good, but I just can't take FWD or FWD bias cars anymore, so I am skeptical.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davizzle
Media Share G35 Coupe V35
23
May 22, 2022 09:26 AM
davizzle
Picture Share
23
Feb 4, 2018 12:41 PM
mbe32
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
10
Nov 13, 2015 11:09 PM
BradMD_96
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
7
Oct 6, 2015 09:31 AM
bigmike
G35 Cars
0
Sep 17, 2015 01:58 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 PM.