G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

October '06 Motor Trend Reviews the '07 G35

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 08:30 PM
  #1  
sr47567's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
October '06 Motor Trend Reviews the '07 G35

Hey Folks,
I just got my October '06 Motor Trend in the mail and they have a First Test ("FT") of the '07 G35S(!) sedan (6MT). They also have a brief comparo against the BMW 330i (manual). These are two different articles.

The FT Recap is:
The new G35 taking on the BMW this November will boast more interior and trunk space, more techno toys, an even wider lead in weight-to-power ratio) now 1.8lbs per bhp, up from 1.2), closer gear spacing, and a conservative restyle. Does it have the right stuff to win back the world welterweight sport-sedan title? Turn the page.

Head-to-head:
Round 1: Acceleration - G35S
Round 2: Braking - G35S
Round 3: Figure eight - Even
Round 4: Slalom - BMW (spanked the G)
Round 5: On the road - BMW

1st Place: BMW - Flits like a butterfly, sings like a B3 Hammond. A smooth operator that never loses its cool
2nd Place: G35S - Killer performance and package with refinement that suffers only by comparison only with this BMW.

I haven't even really started to read the set of articles yet, I just wanted to give you folks some info ASAP.

- SR
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #2  
drewdogg808's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
thanks for the info. will have to pick up a copy of motor trend.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 11:54 PM
  #3  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
Any acceleration numbers
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 12:05 AM
  #4  
ohmrwilson13's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Alhambra, CA
Awesome...thanks for letting us in on the articles. To tell you the truth, I'm really not suprised at all by the verdict...will have to pick up a copy tomorrow. Accel and braking numbers would be wonderful!
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #5  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
the g35 got 5.4 to 60 and 14.0 @ 100mph. The bmw got 6.2 to 60. I got it from another website.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 01:14 AM
  #6  
DaCurryman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by sr47567
an even wider lead in weight-to-power ratio) now 1.8lbs per bhp, up from 1.2)

- SR
Am I missing something here. With a weight of around 3500lbs and power of about 306hp, wouldn't it be a ratio of ~11.75? Or are they referring to just the weight of the engine, which would make the VQ35HR around 550lbs?
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 05:35 AM
  #7  
sr47567's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Spec sheet numbers

Hello Folks,
So it looks like the actual weight to power for the G35S from Motor Trend's Head-to-Head spec sheet is different then the number that they reference in the First Test article. Looks like just a misprint.

From the Spec sheet:
weight to power - 11.8 (this is rounded - Actual seems to be 11.77)
306 @ 6800 bhp
268 @ 5200 lb-ft
7500 Redline
Weight 3604 lbs
53/47% - front/rear weight dist.
5.4 sec 0-60
14.0 @ 100.4 - Quarter Mile
112ft - 60-0 braking
.90g avg - Lateral Accel.
2300 - Top gear revs @ 60mph
33k - Base price (est)
36k - As tested (est)
225/50R18 95W (F)
245/45R18 95W (R)
19/27 mpg - EPA
19.7 mpg - MT

- SR
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 06:32 AM
  #8  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
thnx for the info!
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #9  
Sportcoupe35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
From: MA
ahhh finally torque numbers.
So the 6mt is 0-60mph in 5.4s huh?
That sounds about right with the new engine.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 09:22 AM
  #10  
tekknikal's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: Caribbean
on the one hand that 1/4 time seems slow.
on the other hand, they got 5.5 sec to 60mph and 14.0sec 1/4mi for the IS350...
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #11  
tekknikal's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: Caribbean
their prior g35 test data:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...initi_g35_6mt/
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._overview.html

hmm
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 09:31 AM
  #12  
jrock65's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
I think the 0-60 time (5.4s) was slowed by the high temperature and humidity. Motortrend said that the cars were tested under very humid conditions.

As a case in point, the 2006 330i 6MT that they tested alongside the G35 got a 0-60 of 6.2s in this test, which is on the slow side for that car.

C&D got 5.6s for the 2006 330i 6MT, and Motortrend in its 02/06 issue got 5.8s for the 2006 330i 6MT.
 

Last edited by jrock65; Aug 23, 2006 at 09:33 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #13  
Sportcoupe35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
From: MA
If the 330i is pulling those numbers now...the 335i should be quite impressive.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #14  
Speedoholic's Avatar
G (enie) FUNK ERA
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,616
Likes: 1
Excuse the dumb question: What's "Figure eight"?
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #15  
jawjaw's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Speedoholic
Excuse the dumb question: What's "Figure eight"?
It's Motor Trend's own thing.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.