G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

Rearview Monitor w/o tech pkg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #1  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Rearview Monitor w/o tech pkg

After seeing & driving the car, the thing I'd have the hardest time deciding on would be the tech pkg.

JMO, but....
- The ICC sensor on the front bumper really looks fugggggly.....
- I never really use cruise anyway, so ICC is of no interest.
- AFS adaptive lighting; probably good but I could live w/o it... give me HID bi-xenons & I'm happy.

But.... rear view monitor; that was sweet on my test drive.
I wonder how difficult it would be to add a rear view camera...
It might be as simple as replacing the chrome spoiler with the camera spoiler.
I wouldn't be surprized if it was already prewired to the trunk lid.
 

Last edited by InTgr8r; Oct 22, 2006 at 05:48 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #2  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Traveling Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 30,233
Likes: 175
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
Your thinking is exactly in line with my thoughts Ian, which was why I decided to exclude the tech package.

If I had to guess, I would say that it is definitely pre-wired to the trunk.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #3  
DaCurryman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by inTgr8r
Afte seeing & driving the car, the thing I'd have the hardest time deciding on would be the tech pkg.

JMO, but....
- The ICC sensor on the front bumper really looks fugggggly.....
- I never really use cruise anyway, so ICC is of no interest.
I wonder why they didnt place the sensor behind the grill like on the new Lexus ES350, that way you don't see it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #4  
jerminator's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Sure, it may be easy to add a camera, but I bet you'd have to enable it somehow in the car's computer or NAV system. Or even Non-NAV system? I agree, that would be totally sweet to get it without the tech pkg.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 05:50 PM
  #5  
DWP's Avatar
DWP
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
I'm hardly an expert on such things, but adding the rear view monitor function must involve more than just adding a camera to the trunk. It's the firmware that superimposes the distance markers and anticipated-path lines and ties the camera to the steering, not the camera itself. I very much doubt that the company would be interested in giving out the proprietary firmware separate from the Tech package. Why should they?
 

Last edited by DWP; Oct 22, 2006 at 06:32 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #6  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by DWP
I'm hardly an expert on such things, but adding the rear view monitor function must involve more than just adding a camera to the trunk. It's the firmware that superimposes the distance markers and anticipated-path lines and ties the camera to the steering, not the camera itself. I very much doubt that the company would be interested in giving out the proprietary firmware separate from the Navigation package. Why should they?
I'm betting that the software is there already... just needs the input device or to be enabled.

For example, I have an AVIC-D1 right now.
As soon as I added the iPod input.... everything worked.
adding input to the port is what enabled it.

You may be right though... it may need to be s/w enabled.
I know when you buy the iPod link for BMW it requires a software patch.
This is done by the dealer.
.... I could live with that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 11:27 PM
  #7  
Superfly's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Wow guys, I didn't know the bumpers were that ugly. Is there a picture of the ICC bumper and the rearview Camera? pretty please.

TIA
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 23, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #8  
GoofyG28's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco/San Mateo
Originally Posted by Superfly
Wow guys, I didn't know the bumpers were that ugly. Is there a picture of the ICC bumper and the rearview Camera? pretty please.

TIA


 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 01:25 AM
  #9  
Superfly's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Thanks for the pictures.
The front bumper I can live with, but is it necessary to have the wing chromed in the back with the backup camera?
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 01:54 AM
  #10  
DWP's Avatar
DWP
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
It's not a wing, actually, it's the trunk lip, but to answer your question - it sure wasn't necessary for the company to chrome it, but it having been done, it's unavoidable unless you have it painted or something.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 02:03 AM
  #11  
DaCurryman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Superfly
Thanks for the pictures.
The front bumper I can live with, but is it necessary to have the wing chromed in the back with the backup camera?
The chrome rear lip is there regardless of the camera...
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 02:35 AM
  #12  
Superfly's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
that sucks, I don't like that .... I would change it if I had to live with it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 07:32 AM
  #13  
Speedoholic's Avatar
G (enie) FUNK ERA
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,616
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by inTgr8r
After seeing & driving the car, the thing I'd have the hardest time deciding on would be the tech pkg.

JMO, but....
- The ICC sensor on the front bumper really looks fugggggly.....
- I never really use cruise anyway, so ICC is of no interest.
- AFS adaptive lighting; probably good but I could live w/o it... give me HID bi-xenons & I'm happy.

But.... rear view monitor; that was sweet on my test drive.
I wonder how difficult it would be to add a rear view camera...
It might be as simple as replacing the chrome spoiler with the camera spoiler.
I wouldn't be surprized if it was already prewired to the trunk lid.
Exactly my thoughts.

If the Tech package turns out to be an expensive gig, I won't think twice before forgoing it...
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #14  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Traveling Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 30,233
Likes: 175
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
Originally Posted by Speedoholic
Exactly my thoughts.

If the Tech package turns out to be an expensive gig, I won't think twice before forgoing it...
Daniel, the tech package is $1200 CDN so I would expect somewhere around $1k US. It would of been cool to have, but I just didn't see it as a necessity.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #15  
07G's Avatar
07G
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 3
From: Halifax, Canada
Originally Posted by inTgr8r
After seeing & driving the car, the thing I'd have the hardest time deciding on would be the tech pkg.

JMO, but....
- The ICC sensor on the front bumper really looks fugggggly.....
- I never really use cruise anyway, so ICC is of no interest.
- AFS adaptive lighting; probably good but I could live w/o it... give me HID bi-xenons & I'm happy.

But.... rear view monitor; that was sweet on my test drive.
These were my thoughts but I went with the package as we need to back the car into the garage most times and my wife isn't comfortable doing so. I figure the tech package is better than a paint job.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.