Rearview Monitor w/o tech pkg
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by DWP
Anyone who wants the Tech Package but doesn't plan to use the ICC function could presumably remove the ICC sensor and buy the full-width mesh lower grille from the parts department. Not that I would do that - with all the electronic toys in the three packages, I would need all the help I could get with not pranging the car ahead of me. Anyway, once a mandatory front license plate goes on the bumper, the additional hit to the car's looks from the ICC sensor will be trivial by comparison.
I wonder if the sensor was disconnected if it would still function as normal cruise ctrl?
Or, fool the system somehow.
The sensor is probably detected as a resistive device with a feeback signal which = nothing in front.
It may be relatively easy to make up something to fool the system....
hmmmm another KPierson project?
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by S L I C K
Thanks. It does look a little funny. 
Oh well, I guess I have to see it in person before I decide. Are there any shots of the ICC sensor that aren’t so close-up or was that it?
Oh well, I guess I have to see it in person before I decide. Are there any shots of the ICC sensor that aren’t so close-up or was that it?
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 30,233
Likes: 175
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
Originally Posted by S L I C K
Thanks man! The ICC sensor doesn't look too bad in this photo. 
G (enie) FUNK ERA
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,616
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by inTgr8r
Thought about that as well....
I wonder if the sensor was disconnected if it would still function as normal cruise ctrl?
Or, fool the system somehow.
The sensor is probably detected as a resistive device with a feeback signal which = nothing in front.
It may be relatively easy to make up something to fool the system....
hmmmm another KPierson project?
I wonder if the sensor was disconnected if it would still function as normal cruise ctrl?
Or, fool the system somehow.
The sensor is probably detected as a resistive device with a feeback signal which = nothing in front.
It may be relatively easy to make up something to fool the system....
hmmmm another KPierson project?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
