Has anyone dynoed their VQ35HR yet?
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 3
Has anyone dynoed their VQ35HR yet?
Anyone plan to?
What are your guesses for dyno numbers?
I think it will probably be around the 270HP range stock.
What are your guesses for dyno numbers?
I think it will probably be around the 270HP range stock.
Last edited by Diesel350; Nov 29, 2006 at 02:20 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Hypnoz
Come on.... how could so many people have this car and not one person has dyno'd? That would be the first thing to do after break-in....
Originally Posted by Diesel350
Anyone plan to?
What are your guesses for dyno numbers?
I think it will probably be around the 270HP range stock.
What are your guesses for dyno numbers?
I think it will probably be around the 270HP range stock.
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 565
Likes: 2
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by RBull
I think you're a little on the optimistic side. My guess is 255-260 for the 6mt and less for the AT.
What does the stock 06 Coupe and Sedan come in at? these were off the old SAE specifications which was not required to be at the rear wheels, so naturally they could be lower.
from what I'm reading, the 07's are flat out faster... that doesn't happen when the car gets less HP/Torque.
and why would the 6MT have any different rating then the AT? Why would the AT be lower?
Last edited by kring; Dec 4, 2006 at 11:05 AM.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
^You need to take in consideration hp at the crank vs. hp at the wheels. The more hp at the wheels, the better obviously. Most rear wheel drive cars have a up to 20% hp loss through the drivetrain before it gets to the back wheels. So 255 sounds about right.
Edit: I'm not exactly sure what standards are what any more as far as SAE goes. Haven't followed that closely.
Edit: I'm not exactly sure what standards are what any more as far as SAE goes. Haven't followed that closely.
Last edited by N50; Dec 4, 2006 at 11:13 AM.
Waxer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Originally Posted by kring
Why wouldn't it be 300-310? the SAE regulations for HP measurements are at the rear wheel and must be witnessed by a separate 3rd party in order to carry the SAE certified HP rating.
What does the stock 06 Coupe and Sedan come in at? these were off the old SAE specifications which was not required to be at the rear wheels, so naturally they could be lower.
from what I'm reading, the 07's are flat out faster... that doesn't happen when the car gets less HP/Torque.
and why would the 6MT have any different rating then the AT? Why would the AT be lower?
What does the stock 06 Coupe and Sedan come in at? these were off the old SAE specifications which was not required to be at the rear wheels, so naturally they could be lower.
from what I'm reading, the 07's are flat out faster... that doesn't happen when the car gets less HP/Torque.
and why would the 6MT have any different rating then the AT? Why would the AT be lower?
http://www.sema.org/main/semaorghome.aspx?id=56097
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 12
Originally Posted by kring
Why wouldn't it be 300-310? the SAE regulations for HP measurements are at the rear wheel and must be witnessed by a separate 3rd party in order to carry the SAE certified HP rating.
What does the stock 06 Coupe and Sedan come in at? these were off the old SAE specifications which was not required to be at the rear wheels, so naturally they could be lower.
from what I'm reading, the 07's are flat out faster... that doesn't happen when the car gets less HP/Torque.
and why would the 6MT have any different rating then the AT? Why would the AT be lower?
What does the stock 06 Coupe and Sedan come in at? these were off the old SAE specifications which was not required to be at the rear wheels, so naturally they could be lower.
from what I'm reading, the 07's are flat out faster... that doesn't happen when the car gets less HP/Torque.
and why would the 6MT have any different rating then the AT? Why would the AT be lower?
An AT will likely have less rear wheel HP due to more driveline loss than a MT, even if the SAE spec'd. crank HP is the same.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB Canada
Originally Posted by RBull
I think you're a little on the optimistic side. My guess is 255-260 for the 6mt and less for the AT.
Here's a dyno of the M45 which of course has an extra 19hp at the crank.
http://forums2.freshalloy.com/showthread.php?t=158754
Originally Posted by kring
Why wouldn't it be 300-310? the SAE regulations for HP measurements are at the rear wheel and must be witnessed by a separate 3rd party in order to carry the SAE certified HP rating.
What does the stock 06 Coupe and Sedan come in at? these were off the old SAE specifications which was not required to be at the rear wheels, so naturally they could be lower.
from what I'm reading, the 07's are flat out faster... that doesn't happen when the car gets less HP/Torque.
and why would the 6MT have any different rating then the AT? Why would the AT be lower?
What does the stock 06 Coupe and Sedan come in at? these were off the old SAE specifications which was not required to be at the rear wheels, so naturally they could be lower.
from what I'm reading, the 07's are flat out faster... that doesn't happen when the car gets less HP/Torque.
and why would the 6MT have any different rating then the AT? Why would the AT be lower?
Originally Posted by Jeff Flowerday
Yah that would be close. I'd say 250-255 for the manual and 245-250 for the auto. After 10,000 miles the manual might start closing in on 255+.
Here's a dyno of the M45 which of course has an extra 19hp at the crank.
http://forums2.freshalloy.com/showthread.php?t=158754
Here's a dyno of the M45 which of course has an extra 19hp at the crank.
http://forums2.freshalloy.com/showthread.php?t=158754
