G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

Will gas mileage get any better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #46  
GEE35FX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,045
Likes: 36
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by ChristianN
My X is broken in now and I can tell you it is a huge problem for me!! This car is WAY TOO FAST and sooooo much fun
It definitely likes to go fast, it's sweet spot is around 30-40 km/h over the regular highway speeds so you have to be sooo careful and monitor your speeds constantly or use the cruise. I also find myself putting my foot down every time I am entering some nice curves in the road. It is a fun car.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #47  
4DOORFUN's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Sedanman07
In theory what you say might make sense but with today's technology this isn't always true. For me I bought one of if not the first Sport in New England. So I had no history as buyers today do. Looking at the window sticker it says 18 city 28 highway. My '03 was averaging low 20's so I figured I should average low 20's with the new G.

If you look at the new Z06 Corvette with 505 hp those owners are getting highway mileage in the mid 20's. My '90 ZR-1 Corvette with 400+ hp got 25 mpg.

My new G is getting 14 mpg city and 21 mpg highway. If you look at the aero dynamics of the new G it is as good if not better then a Corvette. So to say a 300hp car like the G shouldn't get half decent gas mileage is incorrect.

What is interesting is the mileage for these cars are all over the place so either the gas in different areas are playing a big factor or some of us are just bad drivers. Or maybe there is something wrong in the computer programming in some of our cars?
Both the G35 and Corvette however around 0.27-0.29 coefficient of drag. It’s a wash.

However, the new Vette weighs about 3150 lbs. That’s a major difference from the G. Take 500lbs. off the G and it too will get highway mileage in the upper 20’s.

You simply cannot overlook vehicle weight. 3600 lbs. is a lot of weight to overcome regardless of aerodynamics.

Based on weight alone, the G35 has to work harder than Corvette to maintain a fixed highway speed. I’d also venture to guess the G35 sees more driveline power loss to the wheels than the Corvette. I have nothing to prove that though. Just a guess because I believe Chevy spends a lot more time and money on the engineering of the Corvette when compared to Infiniti’s G35.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #48  
mchong75's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Dang, I just looked over mine and I'm averaging 18.5 MPG.
I'm barely peaking 4K RPM at around 80 MPH. I'm driving very modest during the break in stage with only 1100 miles.

This is 3 MPG less than the 350Z 6MT (Which I drove hard). I usually averaged 21 to 22 MPG.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #49  
Sedanman07's Avatar
Waxer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Originally Posted by 4DOORFUN
Both the G35 and Corvette however around 0.27-0.29 coefficient of drag. It’s a wash.

However, the new Vette weighs about 3150 lbs. That’s a major difference from the G. Take 500lbs. off the G and it too will get highway mileage in the upper 20’s.

You simply cannot overlook vehicle weight. 3600 lbs. is a lot of weight to overcome regardless of aerodynamics.

Based on weight alone, the G35 has to work harder than Corvette to maintain a fixed highway speed. I’d also venture to guess the G35 sees more driveline power loss to the wheels than the Corvette. I have nothing to prove that though. Just a guess because I believe Chevy spends a lot more time and money on the engineering of the Corvette when compared to Infiniti’s G35.
Very true weight is a factor but less so once you're moving then coefficient of drag comes into play. You're right about the Corvette weight. But going back to my ZR-1 it weighed about 3500 lbs and was pushing 340 hp at the wheels or just over 400 hp and still I was doing 25+ mpg on the highway and 18 - 20 around town. Of course the other factor in any of these cars is gearing. The ZR-1 turned only 1800 rpms at 70-75mph. I noticed the G is much higher. I foget exactly but I thought it was like 2200 rpms.

Do I expect the G should get 28mpg? No, I know window stickers lie but still overall average should still be in the 20 -22 mpg not 16 - 18mpg that some of us appear to be getting. I have gone thru 7 tanks of gas and only 1 of the seven even broke 20 mpg. If I drive purly around town I see 14mpg and I'm taking it easy so I still feel something is out of wack just don't know what.

It'll be interesting to see as we get more and more owners of the '07 over the next few months and see then what the average mpg is. There is still too many of us with cars that are just being broken in.

And don't get me wrong I love this car. If the window sticker said 15 city and 22 highway I probably would have still bought it. It's the fact Infiniti said 18 and 28.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #50  
xboxstrwrs55's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Sedanman07
....If the window sticker said 15 city and 22 highway I probably would have still bought it. It's the fact Infiniti said 18 and 28.
Doesn't the EPA pin down MPG on the stickers?
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 04:37 PM
  #51  
chuckg35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: North Bethesda MD
I have not gotten below 18.5 (bu tthe car computer) and am averaging 19.5 around town (w a cruising commute0 and when I checked got 24-5 on a highway trip, not babying it. I have just over 3000 miles. So yours is not getting its full milage potential.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #52  
CorumG35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Boston Metro-West Suburbs
the main problem I have is the same as mentioned earlier, don't put a completely unrealistic MPG on the window sticker. I have never had a car that was so far off what the sticker said.

I did notice something interesting today... The trip computer was showing 40 miles to empty, gas gauge was almost to empty, but I could only fit 16.5 gallons into the tank. Maybe there is something going on with the trip computer/gas tank sensor. I'll check my MPG by hand next time to see.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #53  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

Originally Posted by xboxstrwrs55
Doesn't the EPA pin down MPG on the stickers?
Correct. It's not Infiniti saying that.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #54  
Bambeezer's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
The high rpm's in 5th gear at highway speeds doesn't help any either (5 AT). I keep checking to see if the car needs to shift. 3K at highway speeds on the auto's just seems high. I guess I'm just spoiled by the 6th gear in my old Firebirds and Corvettes.

I'm not convinced the weight is the reason either. I had a V8 firebird with a 4speed auto, big cam, 4K rpm stall, and it averaged the same as my G. They both weigh about the same. My Firebird wouldn't even pass inspection, but it managed equal mpg.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #55  
Sedanman07's Avatar
Waxer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Originally Posted by chuckg35
I have not gotten below 18.5 (bu tthe car computer) and am averaging 19.5 around town (w a cruising commute0 and when I checked got 24-5 on a highway trip, not babying it. I have just over 3000 miles. So yours is not getting its full milage potential.
chuckg35 you're getting exactly what I would expect from this car. To make a correction I am on my 9th tank of gas and only one tank broke 20 mpg in which I drove 100% highway and got 21.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 05:54 PM
  #56  
jpr's Avatar
jpr
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
But bad milage compared to what? My previous car was a CTS-V and performance is only a little bit better but my milage was only in the 13's were the G gives me back 19's with the same driving. I think that we get great performance/economy, maybe the best in the segment.

Jpr
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #57  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Traveling Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 30,233
Likes: 175
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
Originally Posted by GEE35X
Shane , here is an excellent conversion table for mileage in US Gal, Imp Gal, L/100kms:
http://www.tdiclub.com/misc/conversions.html

I just drove around 600 kms and if you are going by the readout on the 07 dash, when I got to InTgr8r's house (2 hour drive) it was reading 9.8 L/100km, Ian did see the reading also. When I returned home from my 3 day trip it was reading 10.2 L/100kms. I kept it under 4,000 rpm except for a couple shots up to 6,000.
This was almost totally highway driving with varying RPMS and speeds.
When you convert these to the other figures it is:
9.8 L/100KM = 23.99 US mpg = 28.8 Imp mpg
10.2 L/100km = 23.05 US mpg = 27.69 Imp mpg
Wayne, I did approximately 3 hours of driving today with the G and also got 9.8 L/100km. At almost 29 MPG, I am extremely satisfied.
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #58  
jasplat88's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
I'm just over halfway through my first tank (224 miles) with at least an hour to an hour and a half of stopped idle time (about 35 minutes of it at the dealer, and I had at least another 30-35 minutes), and I am still averaging 15.9mpg. I am amazed at how good the gas mileage is for the type of driving I am doing. I would bet I get 18-20 in city once I get past this first or second tank (and am not sitting idle learning the car as much).
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #59  
N50's Avatar
N50
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Garnet Canuck
Wayne, I did approximately 3 hours of driving today with the G and also got 9.8 L/100km. At almost 29 MPG, I am extremely satisfied.
Well, a least its good to know that the new HR's may not be gas guzzlers after all. Either that or your the lucky one of the bunch.
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #60  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Traveling Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 30,233
Likes: 175
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
Originally Posted by N50
Well, a least its good to know that the new HR's may not be gas guzzlers after all. Either that or your the lucky one of the bunch.
I don't find it too bad at all so far. I had four adults in the car and the trunk loaded with presents too, so I think 29 MPG (imperial gallons) is pretty darn good. I think that I will be able to get over the 30 MPG mark when the engine is fully broke in and in warmer temps.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 PM.