G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

Updated Gas Milage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #1  
kring's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 565
Likes: 2
From: Connecticut
Updated Gas Milage

Not sure if this has been posted yet.

The US EPA's updated on mileage for the G35.

5AT:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...umn=1&id=23575

6MT:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...umn=1&id=23574

AWD:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...iti&model=G35x

It's odd that the AWD has better milage???
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #2  
John105's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
That's great politics because in NJ, <= 19 mpg means luxury tax. Many seemingly innocent cars will be added to the rolls that are taxed as a result.

Even more ludicrious is no matter what number and what combinations of numbers I put into their conversion calculator, it merely subtracted 2 mpg. We already know that the EPA is one of the least scientific agencies in DC, but...now all we need is for DOT to revise UTQG ratings for tires, I'm thinking subtract 2 from the treadwear and one letter, so what used to be 140 AA A is now 138 BB B
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #3  
Audiophile's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
I feel better now, I had no idea how someone could get 25mpg out of a X, I am finally averaging over 20 and the weather has been horrible lately, once the temperature levels off a bit I suspect I will get close to(if not) 23mpg.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
gao's Avatar
gao
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Originally Posted by kring
It's odd that the AWD has better milage???
how so? they all seem to have the same deductions.

at any rate, the 19 combined for the X seems too optimistic.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #5  
CodingDane's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Well, that does seem more realistic.

I'm averaging around 20 mpg on my X, but I drive 80-90% highway (990 miles in my first 10 days with the car).
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:28 PM
  #6  
Sedanman07's Avatar
Waxer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Interesting, the 16.1 mpg average based on 1 vehicle must have been my G.

I have still never seen 20mpg average after almost 4,000 miles. I've never seen 20 mpg period.

They say 20 combined, I would love to see 20 mpg!
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #7  
Christian's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,154
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Originally Posted by gao
how so? they all seem to have the same deductions.

at any rate, the 19 combined for the X seems too optimistic.
I don't really agree, I'm averaging about 17.6 calculated in my X with atleast 90% of my driving in the city.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #8  
95se's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Central Mass
I'm getting about 17.9 with my X but I'm driving it like a madman.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 05:14 PM
  #9  
gao's Avatar
gao
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Originally Posted by ChristianN
I don't really agree, I'm averaging about 17.6 calculated in my X with atleast 90% of my driving in the city.

Either you are one of the lucky few or SedanMan and I got the sucky batch of Xs. Its just unbelievable what a huge discrepancy between mine and yours. For the record, I'm still averaging 14ish combined. Even the mad man got 17s

 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 05:22 PM
  #10  
Christian's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,154
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Originally Posted by gao
Either you are one of the lucky few or SedanMan and I got the sucky batch of Xs. Its just unbelievable what a huge discrepancy between mine and yours. For the record, I'm still averaging 14ish combined. Even the mad man got 17s

I have no idea why your fuel consumption is so bad. I attribute my mid 17s to the cold weather and only driving in the city, so I think I will see better results when it warms up a bit.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #11  
randman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, NY
Hmmm... my wife's XC90 gets 19 combined (and that's an SUV with a V8 engine).
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #12  
herschelg123's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Chino, CA
I am getting 17.5 MPG in my Sport. That is up from 16.8 last week! And that is in all kinds of driving in all kinds of traffic.
As I learn the gas pedal, I am hoping to seem my MPG go up. I will keep you posted.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #13  
CFar's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Mine seems to be right on in combined at 20.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #14  
batmobl's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
I get 20mpg in hwy/city driving conditions and 23mpg on the hwy.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #15  
acidrane's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: los angeles, ca
i get mid 17's 75% city btu i also have the lead foot mod. anyone else get that mod too??
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.