Is everyones MPG as bad as mine?
#34
Originally Posted by John2.5RS
It's almost $3/gal here in PHX for 91, it's $5.99/gal for 101 oct.
101, have you or anyone tried higher octane? Curious how the car reacts with it since it's designed around 91. I use 93, although I doubt there's really any difference between 91 & 93, but 10 more octane is over 10%, it's a considerable amount more.
#36
#37
#39
I don't understand how anyone can be happy with <20 MPG on a 4 door commuter car.
Infiniti has always made gas guzzler vehicles, look at every single car in their lineup right now and the best of the bunch, the G35, equates to a Suburban or Ford Expedition in it's MPG numbers. I've been on this forum a while and even in the last car the numbers stated by the company always seemed higher than real world driving.
It's quite sad and IMO ruins an otherwise great car.
Infiniti has always made gas guzzler vehicles, look at every single car in their lineup right now and the best of the bunch, the G35, equates to a Suburban or Ford Expedition in it's MPG numbers. I've been on this forum a while and even in the last car the numbers stated by the company always seemed higher than real world driving.
It's quite sad and IMO ruins an otherwise great car.
#40
Originally Posted by Neil
I don't understand how anyone can be happy with <20 MPG on a 4 door commuter car.
Infiniti has always made gas guzzler vehicles, look at every single car in their lineup right now and the best of the bunch, the G35, equates to a Suburban or Ford Expedition in it's MPG numbers. I've been on this forum a while and even in the last car the numbers stated by the company always seemed higher than real world driving.
It's quite sad and IMO ruins an otherwise great car.
Infiniti has always made gas guzzler vehicles, look at every single car in their lineup right now and the best of the bunch, the G35, equates to a Suburban or Ford Expedition in it's MPG numbers. I've been on this forum a while and even in the last car the numbers stated by the company always seemed higher than real world driving.
It's quite sad and IMO ruins an otherwise great car.
- I get in, and push the button to start
- Use the paddles to shift
- Press the gas, and go really fast
- Plus it's really comfortable
- I'm delighted
Compared to those attributes, really couldn't care less about mpg. Different folks...
#41
#42
#43
#44
Mpg
Considering that everyone here seems to be averaging between 16 and 22, I would say that is really good considering the weight and power of this car. I am hoping to purchase a G35 this year, but I am currently driving a 1997 Buick Skylark w/ 3.1L V6(155hp
), and I am averaging about 19 MPG with a pretty even city/highway split. Consider yourselves lucky
![Frown](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
![Smilie](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#45
Originally Posted by Ca$hio
![](http://anthonybradley.worldmagblog.com/anthonybradley/inigomontoya.jpg)
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
< = Greater than > = Less than
<= is less than or equal to and >= is greater than or equal to < is less than and > is greater than.
It's also not a word, it's a symbol. If it makes you happy next time I'll type the words out for you.
All these stupid semantics still don't change the fact that the G35 has ****ty MPG.