shift selector sticking
shift selector sticking
I have noticed over the last week or so that my gear shift selector will stick in park when i try to shift to reverse. My foot is clearly on the brake and i am pulling the safety trigger. I usually get it on the third tug. Anyone else experience this? I have an X.
Thanks
Thanks
ive noticed that in this car, the order in which you do things is critical. if i press the brake pedal and the shift lever button simultaneously, or in really closed tandem, the shift lock does not disengage. you have to "push brake , wait, press button" to get out of park reliably.
i find this annoying myself... it's too sensitive.
i find this annoying myself... it's too sensitive.
I have this same problem. Sometime is happens and sometimes it doesn't. I have yet to find a pattern in the behavior. I mentioned this to the service guys at my last oil change, but they could find no problem.
Originally Posted by Altersys
ive noticed that in this car, the order in which you do things is critical. if i press the brake pedal and the shift lever button simultaneously, or in really closed tandem, the shift lock does not disengage. you have to "push brake , wait, press button" to get out of park reliably.
i find this annoying myself... it's too sensitive.
i find this annoying myself... it's too sensitive.
The shift-lock mechanism is a small plastic piece that must move out of the way of the shift lever. With any pressure on the lever, it will not fall out.
you know, i've been thinking about this lately...
with respect to this curiosity, and the way the nav and musicbox functions are severely disabled when the car is moving, etc. Infiniti is oddly very conservative with respect to "trusting" the driver and yet the company markets itself as the sportiest of the three japanese luxury makers. i find it odd that the most sedate of the three (arguably, acura) is the least intrusive with respect to control lockouts and safety system sensitivities.
thoughts?
with respect to this curiosity, and the way the nav and musicbox functions are severely disabled when the car is moving, etc. Infiniti is oddly very conservative with respect to "trusting" the driver and yet the company markets itself as the sportiest of the three japanese luxury makers. i find it odd that the most sedate of the three (arguably, acura) is the least intrusive with respect to control lockouts and safety system sensitivities.
thoughts?
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Altersys
you know, i've been thinking about this lately...
with respect to this curiosity, and the way the nav and musicbox functions are severely disabled when the car is moving, etc. Infiniti is oddly very conservative with respect to "trusting" the driver and yet the company markets itself as the sportiest of the three japanese luxury makers. i find it odd that the most sedate of the three (arguably, acura) is the least intrusive with respect to control lockouts and safety system sensitivities.
thoughts?
with respect to this curiosity, and the way the nav and musicbox functions are severely disabled when the car is moving, etc. Infiniti is oddly very conservative with respect to "trusting" the driver and yet the company markets itself as the sportiest of the three japanese luxury makers. i find it odd that the most sedate of the three (arguably, acura) is the least intrusive with respect to control lockouts and safety system sensitivities.
thoughts?
Originally Posted by bruddahmanmatt
It may also be a legal issue. Sure, Infiniti could "trust" drivers, but imagine if someone plows into another car because he's trying to adjust his navigation. There's a good chance the guy who got hit might bitch about "why didn't Infiniti make it such that you can only adjust your nav while stopped." Simply put, "trust" just simply isn't good enough most times.
Hey why not write a letter to Audi about this? Oh wait they already know about it from the lawsuits related to "Unintended Accelleration".
Its not the car companies, is the douche b** Americans who sue everyone because they need to be told even that coffee is hot if you buy it at McDonalds.
Its not the car companies, is the douche b** Americans who sue everyone because they need to be told even that coffee is hot if you buy it at McDonalds.
Originally Posted by KJC5050
Forgive how basic a suggestion this is, but are you sure you're pulling in the trigger toward the bottom (it's hinged on the top)?
Originally Posted by NewGMan
Hey why not write a letter to Audi about this? Oh wait they already know about it from the lawsuits related to "Unintended Accelleration".
Its not the car companies, is the douche b** Americans who sue everyone because they need to be told even that coffee is hot if you buy it at McDonalds.
Its not the car companies, is the douche b** Americans who sue everyone because they need to be told even that coffee is hot if you buy it at McDonalds.
It seems that personal responsibility is dead in America and I don't think there is any way to bring it back to life.
Originally Posted by gdbjr
I plan to be filing a lawsuit later today for being called a douche b**!
It seems that personal responsibility is dead in America and I don't think there is any way to bring it back to life.
It seems that personal responsibility is dead in America and I don't think there is any way to bring it back to life.




