Check this out...3.9 gears for 6mts
Check this out...3.9 gears for 6mts
Just found this on everythingg35.com. Im not even sure if its for our year cars, but im guessing it is because it says g35s and 350z. Im not really to famiiar with gear ratios and what not, but i do know that changing them can help out big time.
Anybody whos more educated on this subject, can you please answer me one question. Im quoting this from the item description.
"These gears really begin to shine with the larger staggered tire setups prevelant in the Z/G world"
why would that be?
so what do yous think..good or no?
http://www.g35parts.com/9083/osc/pro...roducts_id=601
BTW what kind of gears do we have in the car now?
Anybody whos more educated on this subject, can you please answer me one question. Im quoting this from the item description.
"These gears really begin to shine with the larger staggered tire setups prevelant in the Z/G world"
why would that be?
so what do yous think..good or no?
http://www.g35parts.com/9083/osc/pro...roducts_id=601
BTW what kind of gears do we have in the car now?
Last edited by logik05se; Jul 22, 2007 at 11:20 PM.
I don't know if the FD is still applicable. I know the FD swaps are still available for the 07 z's, but they retain the same gear ratios as the previous years.
The gen2 sedans use 3.69 gears, for both the automatic and 6mt's. The difference between the 3.69 and 3.92 gears is less than 6%. The shorter FD will help acceleration in any given gear, but the difference is so minor I doubt it would even be measurable by the clock. Not to mention that it would adversely affect gas mileage.
Another thing to consider is that in the first gens, many people(but not all) that performed FD swaps lost functioning cruise control.
The gen2 sedans use 3.69 gears, for both the automatic and 6mt's. The difference between the 3.69 and 3.92 gears is less than 6%. The shorter FD will help acceleration in any given gear, but the difference is so minor I doubt it would even be measurable by the clock. Not to mention that it would adversely affect gas mileage.
Another thing to consider is that in the first gens, many people(but not all) that performed FD swaps lost functioning cruise control.
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I don't know if the FD is still applicable. I know the FD swaps are still available for the 07 z's, but they retain the same gear ratios as the previous years.
The gen2 sedans use 3.69 gears, for both the automatic and 6mt's. The difference between the 3.69 and 3.92 gears is less than 6%. The shorter FD will help acceleration in any given gear, but the difference is so minor I doubt it would even be measurable by the clock. Not to mention that it would adversely affect gas mileage.
Another thing to consider is that in the first gens, many people(but not all) that performed FD swaps lost functioning cruise control.
The gen2 sedans use 3.69 gears, for both the automatic and 6mt's. The difference between the 3.69 and 3.92 gears is less than 6%. The shorter FD will help acceleration in any given gear, but the difference is so minor I doubt it would even be measurable by the clock. Not to mention that it would adversely affect gas mileage.
Another thing to consider is that in the first gens, many people(but not all) that performed FD swaps lost functioning cruise control.
There have been swaps done into the new 07 pumpkins with aftermarket LSD's. Everything fits no worries.
I am not sure where you are getting your info on the rear diff ratios. It is pretty common knowledge that the automatics in the Z's and G's run a 3.23 rear ratio while the 6mt's run a 3.5 ratio. A lot of the FI guys swap the taller 3.2 ratio into their cars for better top end speed. The 3.9 swap is stictly for better bottom end performance and does take away from the top end of the cars speed.
I am not sure where you are getting your info on the rear diff ratios. It is pretty common knowledge that the automatics in the Z's and G's run a 3.23 rear ratio while the 6mt's run a 3.5 ratio. A lot of the FI guys swap the taller 3.2 ratio into their cars for better top end speed. The 3.9 swap is stictly for better bottom end performance and does take away from the top end of the cars speed.
Last edited by g35_6gear; Jul 23, 2007 at 01:38 PM.
Originally Posted by g35_6gear
There have been swaps done into the new 07 pumpkins with aftermarket LSD's. Everything fits no worries.
Originally Posted by g35_6gear
I am not sure where you are getting your info on the rear diff ratios. It is pretty common knowledge that the automatics in the Z's and G's run a 3.23 rear ratio while the 6mt's run a 3.5 ratio. A lot of the FI guys swap the taller 3.2 ratio into their cars for better top end acceleration. The 3.9 swap is stictly for better bottom end performance and does take away from the top end of the cars speed.
BTW - the auto in the first gens come with a 3.35FD, not a 3.2.
Another note - the taller FD(the 3.3's) does not increase top-end acceleration. Taller gears will always negatively impact acceleration. If the gear ratios are the same, the car with a shorter final drive will always out-accelerate the one with the taller final drive given the same gear and starting rpm. That even applies up top, say at 6k rpms.
The forced induction guys go with the taller FD's for two reasons: traction and gear length. Because one cannot change the individual gear ratios, one can extend a gear by changing the FD or the tire size. With all that power down low, the forced induction guys have a problem with traction in the lower gears. And by lengthening the FD, that means they can stay in a given gear for longer. That is especially useful in the 1/4 mile. If a guy traps 115mph, then he's more than likely going to have to shift into 5th before the end of the run. With a 3.3FD, 4th will top out at a higher speed. And although the taller FD hurts acceleration, the difference in gearing is only about 5%, versus the 27% gearing difference between 4th and 5th.
going with a 3.3 from a 3.5 will theoretically increase top speed, but decrease acceleration, which is where I think g35_6gear is getting confused. A good way to test this is using a simulator such as gran turismo with a custom tranny. You can change individual gears and final drives and test the acceleration and top speed changes due to this. Its a very good way of really understanding the topic in depth
Originally Posted by redlude97
going with a 3.3 from a 3.5 will theoretically increase top speed, but decrease acceleration, which is where I think g35_6gear is getting confused. A good way to test this is using a simulator such as gran turismo with a custom tranny. You can change individual gears and final drives and test the acceleration and top speed changes due to this. Its a very good way of really understanding the topic in depth
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Another note - the taller FD(the 3.3's) does not increase top-end acceleration. Taller gears will always negatively impact acceleration. If the gear ratios are the same, the car with a shorter final drive will always out-accelerate the one with the taller final drive given the same gear and starting rpm. That even applies up top, say at 6k rpms.
The forced induction guys go with the taller FD's for two reasons: traction and gear length. Because one cannot change the individual gear ratios, one can extend a gear by changing the FD or the tire size. With all that power down low, the forced induction guys have a problem with traction in the lower gears. And by lengthening the FD, that means they can stay in a given gear for longer. That is especially useful in the 1/4 mile. If a guy traps 115mph, then he's more than likely going to have to shift into 5th before the end of the run. With a 3.3FD, 4th will top out at a higher speed. And although the taller FD hurts acceleration, the difference in gearing is only about 5%, versus the 27% gearing difference between 4th and 5th.
With regard to the top end my point is that the taller gears can yield a higher top speed for a given rpm, I am not talking about acceleration up to that point.
Diffrentials are the same in the 07 z's as the older cars. I have done Z rear end swaps before when I had my 04 6mt sedan so I see no reason why the LSD or FD parts for the Z would not work in the sedan. It did before.
Last edited by g35_6gear; Jul 23, 2007 at 01:40 PM.
Originally Posted by g35_6gear
Exactly my point. With the FI guys all the power is in the top end. By going to the taller gear you don't have to shift into 5th.....giving a higher mph.
Originally Posted by g35_6gear
With regard to the top end my point is that the taller gears can yield a higher top speed for a given rpm, I am not talking about acceleration up to that point.
Originally Posted by g35_6gear
Diffrentials are the same in the 07 z's as the older cars. I have done Z rear end swaps before when I had my 04 6mt sedan so I see no reason why the LSD or FD parts for the Z would not work in the sedan. It did before.
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Agreed.
I know that the diffs are internally the same, and the diff covers are different, but that's for the z. I have not seen any concrete information on the Diff/FD for the new sedans, so I honestly don't know. I assume that the swaps can still be performed, but it would suck for some one to spend 2k+ on a swap, based on my baseless affirmation, then have to give up.
I know that the diffs are internally the same, and the diff covers are different, but that's for the z. I have not seen any concrete information on the Diff/FD for the new sedans, so I honestly don't know. I assume that the swaps can still be performed, but it would suck for some one to spend 2k+ on a swap, based on my baseless affirmation, then have to give up.
Originally Posted by Alan
i think sharif on the z boards said that everything is the same.... might wana double check just to be sure, but he is a very reliable source.
All this concern over top speed!!! Unless you live in Montana, Bonneville, or are just plain stupid, where are you going to exploit the top end capabilities of a higher gear? I live in Houston, population 2 million, 4 million if you count the out lying areas. My top speed is 65mph. Give me 3.90's any day, F.I. or not....
DOMO <<< doin' the 3.90 gear dance on yo' face!!!
DOMO <<< doin' the 3.90 gear dance on yo' face!!!
Originally Posted by rlwjr1
All this concern over top speed!!! Unless you live in Montana, Bonneville, or are just plain stupid, where are you going to exploit the top end capabilities of a higher gear? I live in Houston, population 2 million, 4 million if you count the out lying areas. My top speed is 65mph. Give me 3.90's any day, F.I. or not....
DOMO <<< doin' the 3.90 gear dance on yo' face!!!
DOMO <<< doin' the 3.90 gear dance on yo' face!!!



