I read the rules about sig lines today. After an offical infraction was issued. lol.

Rules are rules. No problem. But allowing 4 lines just because you are premier doesn't automatically unclutter the signature. Regardless of membership status, everyone still has to deal with the # of lines in a signature. 4 lines for non premier is just as cluttered as 4 lines for a premier.

I've already modded my sig to the rules. I just think the "cluttered" reasoning doesn't have much practical logic to it.

 

Mike. You can't see my sig at all? I modded it, not eliminated it.

 

yes - the clutter is gone... tell me you were kidding about the warning so I can delete my previous post.

You had to be kidding.

 

Mike. My question is can you see ANY of my sig or is it totally and 100% blank?

And yes, I got a warning right after someone read your post about my sig:

 

as tempted as I am to mess with you and say no I see nothing, I wont... yes, of course I see you sig Jeff - we see it the same way you do.

You have PM.

 

Well if you said you couldn't see it, I was going to put "Mike is a lesbian" in it. LOL! j/k

 

it is true - I am a lesbian trapped in a man's body

 

I'm sorry Cal and no offense to you but that makes no sense as well.

Reduce clutter?? What clutter.... we are allowed a certian amount of lines/characters in our sigs what difference does it make if someone has...

"Plenum Spacer-Exhaust-Intake-Tune-etc" in their sig
or
"Plenum Spacer For sale"


I can answer that for you...NONE, makes no difference what so ever.

 

^^^ Don’t attempt to apply logic to the equation; you’ll mess up the system.

 

I can't comment on the reason the rule was created, definitely way before my time, but it is not a new rule.
Yeah, it couldn't be that it was just overlooked and no one happened to notice it till you pointed it out. Having a member point something out then having it corrected, that is just too logical because it would be following what I said earlier about giving specific examples to the staff.

 

overlooked??? multiple staff replied to multiples of his posts! How could it have been over-looked?

Its a game, and now your playing a game about how much of a game it is.

 

Did I say a mistake wasn't made? No, I said it was overlooked.

I can tell you that personally, I never really paid much attention to people's sigs until this thread was created. When you posted the comment about Jeff's sig, I actually had to scroll up and see what you were talking about. Sorry, I'm not perfect. Was it an error on my part? Yes. Will I be paying closer attention to people's signatures in the future? Yes.

You want to say the staff here missed something, fine, but don't start some bs about playing games, you sir are the one playing games.

 

I think what you fail to realize is that all the moderators are volunteers. We don't get paid to do our duties, and thus, the majority of us are members first, and moderators second. We don't go around looking for infractions, when we come across something that we see that could potentially be an issue, then we try to address it or bring in someone with more power/knowledge to do so. Expecting us to have every rule memorized and apply it in every situation would be overkill. We do what we can, if you don't like it, then no one is stopping your from closing the window.

 

Go mods and admins go. Let's just move on from the folks that just want to find fault or challenge the rules.

 

BAM end of story. Instead its a flucking racket