New Market Place format...
#212
#213
#218
- A staff member here saw the "changes" on another IB site (just part 1, where it was the templates w/o the search/section changes)
- The other staff reviewed the changes as they currently were on the other site
- We (those who read/participated in the discussion at the time) decided to move forward with the changes
- Changes had run like we had expected for two months, then last week part 2 (which we were previously unaware of) was implemented
I think what we (at least, myself) had expected is how the forum was a few months ago. Basically, all the sections (vendor, classifieds, canada) all existed as real sections...but to create a new thread, you had to use the template that required you to enter in certain pieces of information. This information was consistent with the current posting rules for the section (e.g. requiring price, location, etc.). This both ensured members got the info they needed in an easy, clear manner and made it easier on the staff since we didn't have to go check for those things.
Now, as best I can recall, there was discussion about how this new template would enhance the searching capability. I remember thinking that it would function similar to the prefixes which were already in place. I don't think any of us realized that the sections we'd had for years were going to go away.
Please continue to post your feedback here, I for one appreciate reading it. I know the staff here are all just as concerned as you guys are about this. After all, we're all members as well and most of us buy/sell things in the classifieds like everyone else.
The real question now is, how do we fix this and ensure things like this don't happen again in the future.
-kernel
#220
and it's back.
https://g35driver.com/forums/private...available.html
https://g35driver.com/forums/private...available.html
It won't go into accessories because it's not created under the marketplace, ergo it doesn't actually have a category tied to it.
That is why I suggested making a new thread.
Do you use IM, if so, PM me your info, and we can try something else, but our timing needs to be precise so that we can revert if necessary.
That is why I suggested making a new thread.
Do you use IM, if so, PM me your info, and we can try something else, but our timing needs to be precise so that we can revert if necessary.
#221
I haven't read through this entire thread, so I'm not sure what all IB v. the staff here has said, but in the interest of being open and honest, I'll say this.
I think what we (at least, myself) had expected is how the forum was a few months ago. Basically, all the sections (vendor, classifieds, canada) all existed as real sections...but to create a new thread, you had to use the template that required you to enter in certain pieces of information. This information was consistent with the current posting rules for the section (e.g. requiring price, location, etc.). This both ensured members got the info they needed in an easy, clear manner and made it easier on the staff since we didn't have to go check for those things.
Now, as best I can recall, there was discussion about how this new template would enhance the searching capability. I remember thinking that it would function similar to the prefixes which were already in place. I don't think any of us realized that the sections we'd had for years were going to go away.
Please continue to post your feedback here, I for one appreciate reading it. I know the staff here are all just as concerned as you guys are about this. After all, we're all members as well and most of us buy/sell things in the classifieds like everyone else.
The real question now is, how do we fix this and ensure things like this don't happen again in the future.
-kernel
- A staff member here saw the "changes" on another IB site (just part 1, where it was the templates w/o the search/section changes)
- The other staff reviewed the changes as they currently were on the other site
- We (those who read/participated in the discussion at the time) decided to move forward with the changes
- Changes had run like we had expected for two months, then last week part 2 (which we were previously unaware of) was implemented
I think what we (at least, myself) had expected is how the forum was a few months ago. Basically, all the sections (vendor, classifieds, canada) all existed as real sections...but to create a new thread, you had to use the template that required you to enter in certain pieces of information. This information was consistent with the current posting rules for the section (e.g. requiring price, location, etc.). This both ensured members got the info they needed in an easy, clear manner and made it easier on the staff since we didn't have to go check for those things.
Now, as best I can recall, there was discussion about how this new template would enhance the searching capability. I remember thinking that it would function similar to the prefixes which were already in place. I don't think any of us realized that the sections we'd had for years were going to go away.
Please continue to post your feedback here, I for one appreciate reading it. I know the staff here are all just as concerned as you guys are about this. After all, we're all members as well and most of us buy/sell things in the classifieds like everyone else.
The real question now is, how do we fix this and ensure things like this don't happen again in the future.
-kernel
I was fine with the "part 1"
Made since to me to help cut down on people not providing enough information, but it still needed a little fine tuning (like making coupe vs sedan obvious/required, and allowing you to go back and change the price for example)
However "part 2" is a complete disaster
Is there no way we can go back to the "part 1" version?
#222
Thanks.
I was fine with the "part 1"
Made since to me to help cut down on people not providing enough information, but it still needed a little fine tuning (like making coupe vs sedan obvious/required, and allowing you to go back and change the price for example)
However "part 2" is a complete disaster
Is there no way we can go back to the "part 1" version?
I was fine with the "part 1"
Made since to me to help cut down on people not providing enough information, but it still needed a little fine tuning (like making coupe vs sedan obvious/required, and allowing you to go back and change the price for example)
However "part 2" is a complete disaster
Is there no way we can go back to the "part 1" version?
#223
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
We should be able to vote and/or be included in some way next time something "New" or "Improved" is contemplated before acting upon it. I mean premier members pay to support and be a part of this website. So I hope our voices can be heard and our requests implemented regarding this issue.