G37 Coupe V36 2008+ Discussion about the G37 Coupe

Infiniti G37 too heavy? Maybe not !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #16  
CHI-TOWN G37's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
More bavarian beer talk. I'll take mine alcohol-free please.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #17  
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
E36 M3 was 2 gens ago AND came with a I6 VS V8? What's the G's excuse?

I don't see your point. The E36 M3 was 400 lbs lighter than the E46 M3 and they both had I6. What's the excuse for that? Yes, the E46 was a faster car, but did not out-handle the E36. The G37 out-handles the G35 Coupe and is also quicker. The M3 gained about 150 lbs and so did the G37. We shouldn't be comparing the G37 to the M3 in any form anyway, but I understand the OP's point. I wouldn't call the G37 a disgrace, because you get alot of car in that 3700 lb package and I'm not talking about the engine only.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #18  
Initial G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Wow, to say the E90 M3 is a disgrace is absolutely bananas. First of all, the V8 weighs LESS than the 6 it replaces. Second of all, if you have ever driven or owned an M3, you can justify the increase in weight. I have owned both the E36 and E46 and I can tell you the weight difference was insignificant because of the power increase.

For all of you getting into this straight line speed discussion again...stop being a magazine racer. The M3 is much more of a car than just straight line speed. It is one of the most complete vehicles on the market. Example, Mercedes has been known to be blazing fast on the straight line, but weak around the corners. This new C63 or 65 has made a dramatic improvement in handling and now becomes a competitor for the M3. The M3 is just a superior vehicle all the way around.

Yes, the car has a carbon fiber roof and is 3,600 pounds, but come on, look at everything you get. Please do not compare a Z06 to an M3, that is just an insult. The fit and finish of chevy is terrible. It is hands down a monster on the straight-line and very fast on the curves. But have you sat in one? It screams low-quality. I am not going to pay 55k for a car that feels like as if i'm driving a neon. No offense current neon owners.

I love the G37 and if I could afford the M3, I would certainly get one. But, please do not start calling it disgraceful. Especially, if you have never owned one. There is more to driving than straight line speed.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #19  
Yimbie's Avatar
Yin-Yang and Life
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
I don't see your point. The E36 M3 was 400 lbs lighter than the E46 M3 and they both had I6. What's the excuse for that? Yes, the E46 was a faster car, but did not out-handle the E36. The G37 out-handles the G35 Coupe and is also quicker. The M3 gained about 150 lbs and so did the G37. We shouldn't be comparing the G37 to the M3 in any form anyway, but I understand the OP's point. I wouldn't call the G37 a disgrace, because you get alot of car in that 3700 lb package and I'm not talking about the engine only.
Very nice post, Deang35c6. I really appreciate your statements.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #20  
jnmunsey's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Yimbie
*sighs* lets not get into a G37 hate fest please... I'm so sick of it.
Then go away. We're all sick of you're whining. You sound like those homeowners association women complaining about someone's grass being 2mm too long..
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #21  
Yimbie's Avatar
Yin-Yang and Life
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Initial G
There is more to driving than straight line speed.
I completely agree. But unfortunately... you're speaking to a lot of deaf ears.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #22  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Initial G
Wow, to say the E90 M3 is a disgrace is absolutely bananas. .
Don't think anyone did.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #23  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

None I guess. But that doesn't excuse the G37s piggie weight with an all aluminum V6

Originally Posted by Deang35c6
I don't see your point. The E36 M3 was 400 lbs lighter than the E46 M3 and they both had I6. What's the excuse for that? Yes, the E46 was a faster car, but did not out-handle the E36. The G37 out-handles the G35 Coupe and is also quicker. The M3 gained about 150 lbs and so did the G37. We shouldn't be comparing the G37 to the M3 in any form anyway, but I understand the OP's point. I wouldn't call the G37 a disgrace, because you get alot of car in that 3700 lb package and I'm not talking about the engine only.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:53 PM
  #24  
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by Initial G
Wow, to say the E90 M3 is a disgrace is absolutely bananas. First of all, the V8 weighs LESS than the 6 it replaces. Second of all, if you have ever driven or owned an M3, you can justify the increase in weight. I have owned both the E36 and E46 and I can tell you the weight difference was insignificant because of the power increase.

For all of you getting into this straight line speed discussion again...stop being a magazine racer. The M3 is much more of a car than just straight line speed. It is one of the most complete vehicles on the market. Example, Mercedes has been known to be blazing fast on the straight line, but weak around the corners. This new C63 or 65 has made a dramatic improvement in handling and now becomes a competitor for the M3. The M3 is just a superior vehicle all the way around.

Yes, the car has a carbon fiber roof and is 3,600 pounds, but come on, look at everything you get. Please do not compare a Z06 to an M3, that is just an insult. The fit and finish of chevy is terrible. It is hands down a monster on the straight-line and very fast on the curves. But have you sat in one? It screams low-quality. I am not going to pay 55k for a car that feels like as if i'm driving a neon. No offense current neon owners.

I love the G37 and if I could afford the M3, I would certainly get one. But, please do not start calling it disgraceful. Especially, if you have never owned one. There is more to driving than straight line speed.
Dude, relax! I based my post on the post that referred to the G37 as a pig and and a disgrace. How can the G37 be a pig and a disgrace based on that poster's definition and not the M3? It may be a disgrace if I was a 911 turbo owner, so I guess it's all subjective. Read the entire thread and you'll see the logic I was trying to apply here.

I know the M3 is a great car and each generation gets better, but weighs a little more. The tranformation from the G35 Coupe to the G37 has added 150 lbs, but it's a better car all around and not just straight line speed.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #25  
CHI-TOWN G37's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jnmunsey
Then go away. We're all sick of you're whining. You sound like those homeowners association women complaining about someone's grass being 2mm too long..
I'm sorry, don't you have a Dodge to fix? ...or maybe go cut the neighbor's lawn.

BTW it's "your" not "you're" in this context.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #26  
InfinitiFreak's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
Dude, relax! I based my post on the post that referred to the G37 as a pig and and a disgrace. How can the G37 be a pig and a disgrace based on that poster's definition and not the M3? It may be a disgrace if I was a 911 turbo owner, so I guess it's all subjective. Read the entire thread and you'll see the logic I was trying to apply here.

I know the M3 is a great car and each generation gets better, but weighs a little more. The tranformation from the G35 Coupe to the G37 has added 150 lbs, but it's a better car all around and not just straight line speed.
Awesome post, I got the point that you were making and I agree with you.
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 03:00 PM
  #27  
Yimbie's Avatar
Yin-Yang and Life
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by jnmunsey
Then go away. We're all sick of you're whining. You sound like those homeowners association women complaining about someone's grass being 2mm too long..
I'm sorry... but who's "all"?
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #28  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Yimbie
I'm sorry... but who's "all"?
Me...........
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #29  
Initial G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
The M3 has a carbon fiber roof and a +$20k stipend over the G37, which should be used for weight-saving materials, but still weighs almost 3700 lbs. I see that as a disgrace for the E90 M3, when the E36 M3 came in at 3100 lbs.
I should have quoted the author I was responding to. This is what I was referring to.

So YOU relax. lol
 
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #30  
N50's Avatar
N50
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Me...........
but of course...(enter grey poupon smarta** comment here). You know what I'm talking about, Jeff. LOL
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.