View Poll Results: Which one
2008 G37S
86
74.14%
2007 G35C
30
25.86%
Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll
...Thinking Of Getting A G37S...
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: aka ]\[ /-\ ]\/[ Htown but NOLA is home
depending on how much of a discount u get on the G35, i guess....if u can get a fully loaded G37S for about 42k...and a fully loaded G35 for about 35k..then that's quite a difference...unless 7k isn't much of a factor for u
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
1 ting
the alleged vibrations/tremors(lol) the G35 gives out, is what really impairs my decision to get the G35, how BAD is it really? altho there sum issues with the mirrior, etc. im guessin the G37 has fixed all these issues.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: West Covina
Get the G37s. Today was my third time going to see the car love it love it. Im trading in my G35 coupe for one. And if you have the AT. G35 0-60 is about 6 sec. and the manual is about 5.7 seconds give or take. I think there is a differnce between the two. I test drove the 07 sedan that thing is quick made my g35 feel like my IS300 when I use to own it. Test drove the G37 and that thing felt like the sedan if not quicker.
Last edited by RoCkY86; Aug 12, 2007 at 07:14 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I love the way the exterior looks on the 07 G35 and the 08 G37 but the interior is what does it for me. I think the interior on the G35 looks very outdated while the interior on the G37 looks amazing.
IMO G37 > G35
IMO G37 > G35
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: 671 Guam
I've also been deciding between getting a '07 coupe for cheaper price or a '08 G37. But after looking at all the pics and reviews, I'm leaning more towards the G37. I don't mind paying the extra 5-6K for the newer, refined, and more powerful 37.
Originally Posted by muscarel
Sir,
All we have to go by so far are magazines. Everyone who is saying the G37 isn't a performance improvement is going by the G37 magazine tests. I do not doubt that people will be able to improve on those times just like people (some) improved on the G35 magazine time. So, to compare apples to apples (magazine to magazine):
The G35 is a 6.0-6.2 second car. I would hardle take ONE (I can't think of another) road test and say that's what the car does. MOST others were getting mid-high 14's (check the car magazine sites and edmunds). That's a more reliable number.
The same magazines tested the G37 and were consistently seeing 5.3-5.5 seconds 0-60 (I agree wgaf) and 1/4 mile times from 13.8-14.2 at 100-104 mph.
The G35 road tests were done awhile ago so people might tend to forget the details of them as time has passed. Those are the real numbers no doubt about it. You can check for yourself.
Here are a few (Road and Track, Automobile, and Edmunds):
http://www.roadandtrack.com/reviews/...1_g35_data.pdf
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...4/pageNumber=2
http://www.automobilemag.com/test_data//index1.html
I think Motor Trend was the one with the 5.5 but I could be wrong. I'm positive that if one magazine publishes a test tomorrow that the new G37 ran a 0-60 in 4.8 seconds and a 1/4 mile time in 13.2 seconds, not one of the haters would say "we go by the fastest time - the G37 is a huge performance increase over the G35". They would call it a fluke. And I agree. I go by what MOST people are getting, not the one off road test. That only makes sense, no? Just look at what people with stock G35's are running at the track. There all high 14's (some 15's). You can go by that or the published times, but do not compare some great drag racer times of the G35 with the magazine times of the G37. That's not apples to apples.
So, do you still think it's not an improvement?
All we have to go by so far are magazines. Everyone who is saying the G37 isn't a performance improvement is going by the G37 magazine tests. I do not doubt that people will be able to improve on those times just like people (some) improved on the G35 magazine time. So, to compare apples to apples (magazine to magazine):
The G35 is a 6.0-6.2 second car. I would hardle take ONE (I can't think of another) road test and say that's what the car does. MOST others were getting mid-high 14's (check the car magazine sites and edmunds). That's a more reliable number.
The same magazines tested the G37 and were consistently seeing 5.3-5.5 seconds 0-60 (I agree wgaf) and 1/4 mile times from 13.8-14.2 at 100-104 mph.
The G35 road tests were done awhile ago so people might tend to forget the details of them as time has passed. Those are the real numbers no doubt about it. You can check for yourself.
Here are a few (Road and Track, Automobile, and Edmunds):
http://www.roadandtrack.com/reviews/...1_g35_data.pdf
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...4/pageNumber=2
http://www.automobilemag.com/test_data//index1.html
I think Motor Trend was the one with the 5.5 but I could be wrong. I'm positive that if one magazine publishes a test tomorrow that the new G37 ran a 0-60 in 4.8 seconds and a 1/4 mile time in 13.2 seconds, not one of the haters would say "we go by the fastest time - the G37 is a huge performance increase over the G35". They would call it a fluke. And I agree. I go by what MOST people are getting, not the one off road test. That only makes sense, no? Just look at what people with stock G35's are running at the track. There all high 14's (some 15's). You can go by that or the published times, but do not compare some great drag racer times of the G35 with the magazine times of the G37. That's not apples to apples.
So, do you still think it's not an improvement?
Funny in the last link the '03 S2000 was also tested with 5.3 0-60 14.3 1/4. My G didn't have any trouble leaving one on 3 occasions.
I have the 05 coupe and I love it, i saw the new coupe at the dealer today =\ i didnt liek the design, but if you don't care about hte looks as much. then id go with the new one with improved interrior and engine and technology.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post