N/A - headers a yes or no?
#31
The big difference with the Crawford headers (over the competition) is not that they are equal-length (as others are as well), but that they are long-tube headers. Crawford offers the only long-tube headers for the G, which is why they have a higher peak-gain over many of the others and why the engine needs to be raised to install them.
#32
#33
Originally Posted by GT-Ron
The big difference with the Crawford headers (over the competition) is not that they are equal-length (as others are as well), but that they are long-tube headers. Crawford offers the only long-tube headers for the G, which is why they have a higher peak-gain over many of the others and why the engine needs to be raised to install them.
#34
#35
Originally Posted by ChiefyMan
Is there going to be much of a difference in gain (on dyno, buttdyno, and times) - sound aside - between 5/16", intake, exhaust, and header vs. 5/16", intake, exhaust, header, and HFC?
Rick
#39
#40
#41
Originally Posted by ISMSOLUTIONS
Yes - as stated additional with those mods -
I have seen with Stillen intake and 1/2" spacer and increase of 12HP and 10 TQ......Rick
I have seen with Stillen intake and 1/2" spacer and increase of 12HP and 10 TQ......Rick
#42
Originally Posted by ChiefyMan
Alright, and what kind of effect does it have on the power band? Is the improvement pretty evenly distributed, or are we talking mostly upper-RPM improvement or very peaky, what?
#43
Originally Posted by diablo1356
ive heard doing all the normal exhaust mods excluding the exhaust is a really good setup...supposedly the stock exhaust flows pretty good and adding in a TD or a larger pipe will cause a big low end power loss...99atlantic is running the I/H/HFC and says he has no power loss but all gain...anyone wanna shed some light on this...ive heard it many times and im in the process of purchasing a stock exhaust to try it out...